On Friday 15 August 2008, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 08:38 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > On Friday 15 August 2008 14:36:58 Dale wrote:
> > >> Somewhat still on the same subject since I am still cleaning.
> > >> Anyway to clean out unneeded files in /etc? I'm
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Dale schrieb am 17.08.2008 05:35:
> OK. Did that. No errors. It is a HUGE list of files. Here is a
SMALL
snippet:
snipping the snippet :-)
They all look about the same as those listed above. What would it
look like if one was orphaned?
Dale
:-) :-)
Detec
Dale schrieb am 17.08.2008 05:35:
> OK. Did that. No errors. It is a HUGE list of files. Here is a
SMALL
snippet:
snipping the snippet :-)
They all look about the same as those listed above. What would it look
like if one was orphaned?
Dale
:-) :-)
Detecting real orphan files is
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Try the attached file, putting the script directly into the mail
probably broke it!
Regards,
Daniel
OK. Did that. No errors. It is a HUGE list of files. Here is a SMALL
snippet:
/etc/make.conf
/etc/wvdial.conf
/etc/default/foldingathome
/etc/prelink.cache
/et
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Sonntag, 17. August 2008, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 16 August 2008 23:40:21 Dale wrote:
I use 3.5.9 and with a newer kernel, I get the same
slowdowns. Could
this me something to do with the kernel? I'm using
Dale schrieb am 17.08.2008 05:06:
Dale wrote:
Will report back later. Dale
:-) :-)
OK. I ran it but not real sure what the output is. Text file
attached. Looks like a error or two and not sure if that matters or not.
Info:
portage-utils-0.1.29
portage-2.2_rc8
Thanks
Dale
:-) :
On Sonntag, 17. August 2008, Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Saturday 16 August 2008 23:40:21 Dale wrote:
> >> I use 3.5.9 and with a newer kernel, I get the same
> >
> > slowdowns. Could
> >
> >> this me something to do with the kernel? I'm using
> >
> > 2.6.23 but the
> >
> >> 2.6.25
On 20:21 Sat 16 Aug, Dale wrote:
> forgottenwizard wrote:
>> On 19:56 Sat 16 Aug, Dale wrote:
>>
>>> Albert Hopkins wrote:
>>>
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 08:38 -0500, Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> On Friday 15 August 2008 14:36:58 Dale wrote:
forgottenwizard wrote:
On 19:56 Sat 16 Aug, Dale wrote:
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 08:38 -0500, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Friday 15 August 2008 14:36:58 Dale wrote:
Somewhat still on the same subject since I am st
On 19:56 Sat 16 Aug, Dale wrote:
> Albert Hopkins wrote:
>> On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 08:38 -0500, Dale wrote:
>>
>>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>>
On Friday 15 August 2008 14:36:58 Dale wrote:
> Somewhat still on the same subject since I am still cleaning. Anyway
>
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 08:38 -0500, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Friday 15 August 2008 14:36:58 Dale wrote:
Somewhat still on the same subject since I am still cleaning. Anyway to
clean out unneeded files in /etc? I'm thinking about files that m
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 16 August 2008 23:40:21 Dale wrote:
I use 3.5.9 and with a newer kernel, I get the same
slowdowns. Could
this me something to do with the kernel? I'm using
2.6.23 but the
2.6.25 kernel does this slow thing. It started in
2.6.24 ra
On Sunday 17 August 2008 01:18:21 Paul Colquhoun wrote:
> Actually, there is one more way to hide a file from du
>
> If there is a file in the /var directory *BEFORE* the
/var partition is
> mounted onto the directory, then du won't find it, but
df will know
> about the space it is using.
>
> You
On Saturday 16 August 2008 23:40:21 Dale wrote:
> I use 3.5.9 and with a newer kernel, I get the same
slowdowns. Could
> this me something to do with the kernel? I'm using
2.6.23 but the
> 2.6.25 kernel does this slow thing. It started in
2.6.24 range.
what video card do you have?
--
alan
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008, Ward Poelmans wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 07:50, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > the difference between du and df is about 640 - 188 = 452 MB.
> > and "df" is showing that my root is full 2.4 times more than "du".
> >
> > which one is the correct one? I've another ser
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
I don't use compiz ;)
and people have reported slowdowns even with kde3.5.9 - with 4.1 it is just
much severe. And when I say 'severe' I talk about lagging for several seconds
between 'key pressed' and 'sign appears on screen'. Or 'mouse button pressed'
and 'desk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I notice a net problem with the new KDE version.
If I use konqueror as browser I failed each first connection trial on
all website. After timeout, I must just press reload and it cnnect with
the website.
With Kmail if I use manual email download
loader/module.o: In function `MODULE_GetProcAddress':
module.c:(.text+0x109): undefined reference to `wrapper_target'
module.c:(.text+0x10e): undefined reference to `wrapper'
module.c:(.text+0x114): undefined reference to `report_entry'
module.c:(.text+0x11e): undefined reference to `report_ret'
lo
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 10:38:31 +0100, Mick wrote:
> Is there a way to convert a .mov file to be playable by a dvd player?
media-video/tovid
--
Neil Bothwick
MIPS: Meaningless Indication of Processor Speed
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Samstag, 16. August 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Friday 15 August 2008 15:41:04 Volker Armin Hemmann
>
> wrote:
> > On Freitag, 15. August 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > Oddly enough, 3D is very very snappy. It's the 2D
>
> stuff that cripples the
>
> > > performance, and on a desktop, 2D i
On Saturday 16 August 2008 03:57:42 b.n. wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann ha scritto:
> > In short: all 8XXX chips are bad. Because of the
thermal environment
> > laptops are on a different place of the bell curve
than desktops. Laptops
> > with nvidia graphic are failing left and right. Whole
seri
On Friday 15 August 2008 15:41:04 Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
> On Freitag, 15. August 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Oddly enough, 3D is very very snappy. It's the 2D
stuff that cripples the
> > performance, and on a desktop, 2D is exactly what
you want.
>
> AFAIK the problem is that the 8XXX s
* Platoali ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [16.08.08 13:13]:
> Sebastian Günther wrote:
> > OK here is a diference to big to be normal between df and du.
> >
> > 14GB against 5.5GB
> >
> > We are definetly missing something...
> >
>
> Yes, that is the strange thing.
>
This should definetly be investigated.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alle giovedì 14 agosto 2008, Daniel Pielmeier ha scritto:
> Rev. Ferris schrieb am 14.08.2008 19:26:
> > #cat /etc/locale.gen
> > it_IT UTF-8
> > de_DE ISO-8859-1
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15
> > de_DE UTF-8
> > it_IT ISO-8859-1
> > [EMAIL PROTECT
On Saturday 16 August 2008, KH wrote:
> Mick schrieb:
> > Is there a way to convert a .mov file to be playable by a dvd player?
>
> Maybe this will help:
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-117709.html
> and
> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Create_a_DVD:Encode
Thanks KH. That's what I was famil
Sebastian Günther wrote:
> OK here is a diference to big to be normal between df and du.
>
> 14GB against 5.5GB
>
> We are definetly missing something...
>
Yes, that is the strange thing.
> > Last week, I was alarmed that / root is 98 percent full. but I could not
> > find any reason why serve
Ward Poelmans wrote:
> You can find those files with lsof | grep "deleted". Try closing the
> process with deleted files and suddenly your du en df will give the
> same free diskspace.
> Ofcourse, a reboot does also the trick.
lsof | grep -i deleted
...
/dev/console (deleted)
mysqld 5679
Mick schrieb:
Hi All,
Is there a way to convert a .mov file to be playable by a dvd player?
Maybe this will help:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-117709.html
and
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Create_a_DVD:Encode
kh
* Platoali ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [16.08.08 11:14]:
> Sebastian Günther wrote:
> > That is what the 5% are for, as you saw there where stated as not
> > available but they are for the superuser for such things.
>
> So there is no way to free some space from journals.
>
> >
> > BTW: Why is your root
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 07:50, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the difference between du and df is about 640 - 188 = 452 MB. and "df" is
> showing that my root is full 2.4 times more than "du".
>
> which one is the correct one? I've another server that this difference is
> about 7 GiG and on that
On Saturday 16 August 2008, Dale wrote:
> Sebastian may have more and better ideas but if a reboot gave you
> some space back, then you should check the tmp directories that are
> usually cleared when rebooting. I notice that in your list /tmp
> takes up 3.8Gb which is a good bit. May want to see
Hi All,
Is there a way to convert a .mov file to be playable by a dvd player?
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Platoali wrote:
Sebastian Günther wrote:
That is what the 5% are for, as you saw there where stated as not
available but they are for the superuser for such things.
So there is no way to free some space from journals.
BTW: Why is your root so full, or didn't you partionate your di
Sebastian Günther wrote:
> That is what the 5% are for, as you saw there where stated as not
> available but they are for the superuser for such things.
So there is no way to free some space from journals.
>
> BTW: Why is your root so full, or didn't you partionate your disk?
I did not partition
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sebastian Günther wrote:
df shows you the available space on the fs and du the size of the files
inside it.
The difference is caused by the journal and the 5% reserved for the
superuser, which du does not take in account
Do others have this kind of inconsista
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [16.08.08 10:08]:
>
> I've another question. On my server root is 80% full and last weed it was 98%
> full. if it get to 100% , How can I delete or flush Journals to free some
> space?
>
That is what the 5% are for, as you saw there where stated as not
a
Sebastian Günther wrote:
> df shows you the available space on the fs and du the size of the files
> inside it.
>
> The difference is caused by the journal and the 5% reserved for the
> superuser, which du does not take in account
>
> > Do others have this kind of inconsistancy on their systems?
>
37 matches
Mail list logo
