On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 07:55 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2008 schrieb ext James:
>
> > I did not try this. what's the option to boot into single user mode?
>
> No need to boot, just "telinit 1" from a running system. And later switch
> back to normal with "telinit 3".
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Wael Nasreddine wrote:
This One Time, at Band Camp, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said, On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 03:05:20PM +0200:
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Wael Nasreddine wrote:
The x86_64 name is used by Red Hat
On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Simon Turner wrote:
> Strange it took almost a day before I could see my post! Guess I was
> "moderated"...
>
> Hi Mick,
> Thanks for the reply. I've gone through about 4 kernel recompiles,
> each time wondering with question marks over my head, sure I had
> every
Am Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2008 schrieb ext James:
> I did not try this. what's the option to boot into single user mode?
No need to boot, just "telinit 1" from a running system. And later switch
back to normal with "telinit 3".
HTH...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162
Dmitry S. Makovey wrote:
> On February 12, 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
So, the only good reason to move to amd64 is when you buy a 64 bit
machine
>>> I have 1G RAM and it's a laptop doesn't serve huge databases so I
>>> guess despite if my CPU is 64 or 32 bits, I'll just
James R. Campbell reliant-data.com> writes:
> What processes have the most on cpu time as reported by a 'ps ax' ?
not certain what your are asking. Here is the result of ps ax:
# ps ax
PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
1 ?Ss 0:00 init [3]
2 ?S< 0:00 [kthreadd]
Strange it took almost a day before I could see my post! Guess I was
"moderated"...
Hi Mick,
Thanks for the reply. I've gone through about 4 kernel recompiles,
each time wondering with question marks over my head, sure I had
everything compiled in... I ended up adding pretty much anything
th
On Feb 12, 2008 10:52 PM, Willie Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 05:37:16PM +0800, Penguin Lover Mark David Dumlao
> squawked:
> > TOTALLY WEIRD. I do a layman -L on my machine and strangely enough,
> ecatmur
> > isn't listed. I think I've used it beore on layman though
On Monday 11 February 2008, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> One of the workstations (amd64 2gig ram) has a load that never drops below
> 1.0, as seen by top. Looking at a ps nothing stands out. I did notice that
> 'X' is at the top of the list, even when the machine is quiescent (nobody
> doing anything)
Henry Gebhardt googlemail.com> writes:
> Any ideas?
> No.But do you also see this without X running,
Yep, same load with X killed off
without most daemons running,
Yep
in single user mode...?
I did not try this. what's the option to boot into single user mode?
What would it prove?
On February 12, 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > So, the only good reason to move to amd64 is when you buy a 64 bit
> > > machine
> >
> > I have 1G RAM and it's a laptop doesn't serve huge databases so I
> > guess despite if my CPU is 64 or 32 bits, I'll just stick with the 32
> > version, works gr
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, dell core2duo wrote:
>but I am still getting WEXT errors.
>Starting wpa_supplicant on wlan0
> ...
> ioctl[SIOCSIWAUTH]: Operation not supported
> WEXT auth param 4 value 0x0 - ioctl[SIOCSIWAUTH]: Operation not
> supported [ ok ]
> th param 5 value 0x1 -
>
> Any ideas?
No.But do you also see this without X running, without most daemons running,
in single user mode...?
Grant wrote:
I'm hoping to use the vpn in three few ways:
1. imap and smtp between my laptop and the mail server
2. ssh from my laptop to the remote server
3. cups printing from the remote server to the print server
I don't think you need a VPN to SSH from your laptop to the remote
s
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Dale wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > It turned out to be a simple matter of cycling the various
> > modem/router PC s in the right order. Once I got the help desk it
> > took about 2 minutes to get things resolved. It was setup right just
> > needed to recycle t
This One Time, at Band Camp, Boris Fersing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said, On Tue,
Feb 12, 2008 at 03:06:13PM -0500:
> On Feb 12, 2008 8:06 AM, Benjamen R. Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Wael Nasreddine wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 10:31:30PM -0500, "Benjamen R. Meyer" <[EMAIL
> > > PROTE
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 19:30 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> > On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > Your statement "it seems like running SSH inside a VPN is better
> > > for security than running SSH on a non-standard port" is
>
On Monday 11 February 2008, Simon Turner wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm having trouble installing gentoo on my old laptop... It says it
> can't find the interface eth0. I believe it has to do with the fact I
> have a pcmcia card with usb ports on which a usb2eth adapter is
> plugged.
>
> On another syste
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:42:44 +0200
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What about having ssh, imap, smtp, cups, and possibly a non-standard
> > https port all hidden within a VPN? Should that be considered a
> > benefit of running a VPN?
One other thought about ssh+vpn, if you have VP
On Feb 12, 2008 8:06 AM, Benjamen R. Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wael Nasreddine wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 10:31:30PM -0500, "Benjamen R. Meyer" <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> As you have an Intel Core Duo, you should have the EMT64E version -
> >> Intel's version of the A
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:23:15 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dan Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> I wanted to try to gauge if there was much of a noticeable
> >> difference with the two IP connections. And it would be handy to
> >> just step through the links changine the GW intermitt
Miguel Peña Gomez linuxhelp.cl> writes:
> atop 3
> filter by "p"
ATOP - galiot 2008/02/12 14:49:183 seconds elapsed
PRC | sys 0.01s | user 0.09s | #proc130 | #zombie0 | #exit ? |
CPU | sys 1% | user 3% | irq 0% | idle197% | wai
Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes:
> > One of the workstations (amd64 2gig ram) has a load that never drops
> > below 1.0, as seen by top. Looking at a ps nothing stands out. I did
> > notice that 'X' is at the top of the list, even when the machine is
> > quiescent (nobody doing anything). Suspic
Wael Nasreddine wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 10:31:30PM -0500, "Benjamen R. Meyer" <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> As you have an Intel Core Duo, you should have the EMT64E version -
>> Intel's version of the AMD64 instruction set - thus x86-64 compatible.
>
>> Best place to check is Intel
Hi,
Some updates.
with the help of following links,
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HARDWARE_BCM43xx
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=647273&highlight=b43
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=649038
http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/b43?action=show&redirect=en%2Fusers%2FDrivers%2Fbcm4
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Grant wrote:
> I need temporary, but automated. Can an ssh tunnel be set up in an
> automated way?
Sure.
Can you write bash scripts?
Can you read man pages?
Just work out what command invocations do what you require and stick
them in a script. Cron the script if
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Grant wrote:
> > Use SSH if you need a quick ad-hoc connection or something
> > temporary. Use OpenVPN if you need something more permanent that is
> > always prsent and just works.
>
> I need temporary, but automated. Can an ssh tunnel be set up in an
> automated way
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Perhaps confusingly, ssh itself can be used to create openVPN-like
> > VPNs (actually, much simpler), using the -w option and a couple of
> > tun (or tap) interfaces on the connected computers.
>
> hehehe, I'd forgetten about that one for a bit
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yup, it does seem way over the top. Surely though there is some
> rhyme to the reason. Man pages are such a large part of the very
> essence of unix. It seems a serious shame that a user is better off
> googling for `linux man ping' than th
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Wael Nasreddine wrote:
> This One Time, at Band Camp, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said, On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 03:05:20PM +0200:
> > On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Wael Nasreddine wrote:
> > The x86_64 name is used by Red Hat and other distros. There are all
> >
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Grant wrote:
> > Even if you just want to encrypt some clear-text protocol that
> > doesn't have an encrypted equivalent, a vpn is still overkill. For
> > that you use ssh tunneling (which is essentially the same thing as
> > an encrypted version of a protocol). 'ssh -X
> > > Your statement "it seems like running SSH inside a VPN is better
> > > for security than running SSH on a non-standard port" is
> > > non-sensical. From a security and encryption perspective, ssh and
> > > OpenVPN are exactly the same thing - stuff wrapped in an encryption
> > > layer provide
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Code like this makes me want to vomit. The
> OS-that-shall-not-be-named pulls stunts like this, I really think FLOSS
> stuff should be better.
>
> So, I have to emerge an entire sgml kit to generate a man page. Wow.
> Especially since last time I loo
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Your statement "it seems like running SSH inside a VPN is better
> > for security than running SSH on a non-standard port" is
> > non-sensical. From a security and encryption perspective, ssh a
dell core2duo wrote:
> No, its not due to proxy.
> See the output below.
> --
> flukebox driver # wget yahoo.com
> --2008-02-12 22:30:56-- http://yahoo.com/
> Resolving relproxy.iitk.ac.in... 172.
Hi,
I complied the kernel buitin broadcom drivers. So now, I have a interface
named "wlan0_rename".
But things are still not working for me.
flukebox flukebox # iwconfig
lono wireless extensions.
eth0
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> Short answer: according to Changelog, use USE=doc for iputils until
> next version of iputils comes out (but be prepared to pull in *lots*
> of stuff meanwhile).
>
> Somewhat longer answer: read
>
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158660
>
Hi,
No, its not due to proxy.
See the output below.
--
flukebox driver # wget yahoo.com
--2008-02-12 22:30:56-- http://yahoo.com/
Resolving relproxy.iitk.ac.in... 172.31.1.233
Connecting to relprox
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Anyone else noticed there is no man page for ping? I know I've looked
> up things in man ping in the past, maybe quite far in the past and
> possibly even on a different distribution, but still I thought maybe
> my man page setup was borked b
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:12:47AM -0500, Andrey Falko wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2008 11:06 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anyone else noticed there is no man page for ping? I know I've looked
I have a ping manpage.
> There is a -doc use flag, which if problably disabled by default.
> USE="do
This One Time, at Band Camp, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said, On Tue,
Feb 12, 2008 at 03:05:20PM +0200:
> On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Wael Nasreddine wrote:
> > Let's say this processor supports 64 bits, what whould I gain from
> > migrating to x86_64 I mean would it be faster??? I've neve
On Feb 12, 2008 11:06 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone else noticed there is no man page for ping? I know I've looked
> up things in man ping in the past, maybe quite far in the past and
> possibly even on a different distribution, but still I thought maybe
> my man page setup was borked b
Anyone else noticed there is no man page for ping? I know I've looked
up things in man ping in the past, maybe quite far in the past and
possibly even on a different distribution, but still I thought maybe
my man page setup was borked but looking at:
equery files net-misc/iputils (which contains
> > I still can't send mail though, with or without
> > authentication. I get this when port scanning with nmap:
> >
> > 25/tcp filtered smtp
> >
> > Does that mean my host is blocking the smtp port?
> It's possible. Or, perhaps you're behind a firewall without
> >>>
dell core2duo schrieb:
> Whenever I am trying to do ssh/telnet/emerge --sync in root mode it gives
> me error saying "Connection Refused: Forbidden". while same works fine in
> user mode.
> Below are some examples .
[...]
> flukebox flukebox # wget yahoo.com
> --2008-02-12 19:50:15-- http://yaho
Hi,
Whenever I am trying to do ssh/telnet/emerge --sync in root mode it gives
me error saying "Connection Refused: Forbidden". while same works fine in
user mode.
Below are some examples .
--
-
> > > I don't think you need a VPN to SSH from your laptop to the remote
> > > server -- SSH is already encrypted.
> >
> > For sure, but it seems like running SSH inside a VPN is better for
> > security than running SSH on a non-standard port or even port
> > knocking. If I need to set up a VPN fo
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 05:37:16PM +0800, Penguin Lover Mark David Dumlao
squawked:
> TOTALLY WEIRD. I do a layman -L on my machine and strangely enough, ecatmur
> isn't listed. I think I've used it beore on layman though, so I look up the
> overlays listing on the gentoo overlays list, here:
>
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 07:18:50PM -0600, Penguin Lover Dan Farrell squawked:
> > I've been waiting and waiting and waiting forever for DSL to come to
> > my neighborhood just so that I can switch to a decent provider and rid
> > myself of this nonsense.
>
> Don't assume DSL will be better. They
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:24:49PM +0100, Penguin Lover Alex Schuster squawked:
> I emerged -e again, this time without distcc and ccache. All compiled fine,
> except for media-video/mplayer-1.0_rc2_p24929-r1 (vf_decimate.c:26: error:
> can't find a register in class `BREG' while reloading `asm')
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Your statement "it seems like running SSH inside a VPN is better for
> security than running SSH on a non-standard port" is non-sensical.
> From a security and encryption perspective, ssh and OpenVPN are
> exactly the same thing - stuff wrapped i
Hi,
Whenever I am trying to do ssh/telnet/emerge --sync in root mode it gives
me error saying "Connection Refused: Forbidden". while same works fine in
user mode.
Below are some examples .
Dale wrote:
443-653-1569 wrote:
On 23:27 Mon 11 Feb , Miguel Peña Gomez wrote:
atop 3
filter by "p"
WOW!!, this atop program is great, one of the best diagnostic tools I've
seen. Why haven't I heard more about it?
Bill Roberts
What package provides that command?
Dale
:-)
Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 443-653-1569 wrote:
>> On 23:27 Mon 11 Feb , Miguel Peña Gomez wrote:
>>
>>> atop 3
>>>
>>> filter by "p"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> WOW!!, this atop program is great, one of the best diagnostic tools I've
>> seen. Why haven't I heard more about it?
>>
>> Bill
443-653-1569 wrote:
On 23:27 Mon 11 Feb , Miguel Peña Gomez wrote:
atop 3
filter by "p"
WOW!!, this atop program is great, one of the best diagnostic tools I've
seen. Why haven't I heard more about it?
Bill Roberts
What package provides that command?
Dale
:-) :-)
--
g
On 23:27 Mon 11 Feb , Miguel Peña Gomez wrote:
>
>
> atop 3
>
> filter by "p"
>
>
>
> El lun, 11-02-2008 a las 19:49 +, James escribió:
> > Hello,
> >
> > One of the workstations (amd64 2gig ram) has a load that never drops below
> > 1.0, as seen by top. Looking at a ps nothing stand
Grant wrote:
I've been waiting and waiting and waiting forever for DSL to
come to my neighborhood just so that I can switch to a decent
provider and rid myself of this nonsense.
Don't assume DSL will be better. They often block ports too
(as you said, it's well within their service agr
> >> I've been waiting and waiting and waiting forever for DSL to
> >> come to my neighborhood just so that I can switch to a decent
> >> provider and rid myself of this nonsense.
> >
> > Don't assume DSL will be better. They often block ports too
> > (as you said, it's well within their service a
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Wael Nasreddine wrote:
> Let's say this processor supports 64 bits, what whould I gain from
> migrating to x86_64 I mean would it be faster??? I've never
> owned/worked on a 64bit machine before so excuse my lack of knowledge
>
> :)
Please stop using the x86_64 nomencl
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Grant wrote:
> > I don't think you need a VPN to SSH from your laptop to the remote
> > server -- SSH is already encrypted.
>
> For sure, but it seems like running SSH inside a VPN is better for
> security than running SSH on a non-standard port or even port
> knocking.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Grant wrote:
> I still can't send mail though, with or without
> authentication. I get this when port scanning with nmap:
>
> 25/tcp filtered smtp
>
> Does that mean my host is blocking the smtp port?
It's possible. Or,
Hi
We were able to install the cross compiler binary packages. The commands
used were as follows:-
$ echo cross-${CTARGET} >> /etc/portage/categories
$ emerge -k binutils
$ emerge -k gcc
$ emerge -k glibc
$ emerge -k linux-headers
The above series of commands installs the cross compiler packages
p
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 10:31:30PM -0500, "Benjamen R. Meyer" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As you have an Intel Core Duo, you should have the EMT64E version -
> Intel's version of the AMD64 instruction set - thus x86-64 compatible.
> Best place to check is Intel's website - here's what I found:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:32:04 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> You forgot to reboot to run the new kernel
That shouldn't be necessary. You can install and compile a new kernel
then re-emerge nvidia-drivers before rebooting. The drivers are built for
the kernel linked from /usr/src/linux, not the runn
I'm currently dual-booting a machine that I'd like to shift completely to
gentoo, but I left an ubuntu installaiton in the other disk (where I hope to
transfer my gentoo). However, my brother has been downloading some torrents
for weeks on end, and their sessions have been left alive in the
gnome-
65 matches
Mail list logo
