Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>> Maybe his/her laptop doesn't stand the
>>> thermal output of its CPU when emerging or maybe he/she's the
>>> administrator of a large company's network, trying to move every
>>> computer system to Gentoo.
>> Check out distccd!
> How does that help? Either every machine
Alexander Puchmayr wrote:
> http://svn.mythtv.org/svn/branches/release-0-20-fixes/mythtv
> svn: Can't open file '.svn/lock': Permission denied
Speaking out of ignorance here, but I wonder if .svn/lock is a file on
your local machine, or if it's on the svn server? I know nothing about
svn, other t
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 09:48:10 am Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
> > I believe that I have this enabled, however ieee80211 is still barfing
> > out by asking for CONFIG_NET_RADIO.
> >
> > I'll check and confirm this tonight.
>
> Also check bugzilla. I remember
[snip]
> Followed by this:
>
> display all 902 possibilities (y or n)
>
> y
>
> and the screen filled up with an alphabetical list of
> executable programs like ls, something-something.sh
> etc. Which is strange because it was /home and
> contained no files like that.
>
This is what happens w
Hi group,
I moved a partition(about 60G) from one drive to
another, slightly larger, using:
dd if=/dev/hdc4 of=/dev/hdc6 bs=32k
When the operation completed this appeared:
904017 +1 records in
1904017 record out
numbers which are precisely 999,999 apart. What is
that all about?
Followed by
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 07:48:12AM -0800, Grant wrote
> Lately I've been shopping around for other distros as well as looking
> at *BSD. Gentoo development seems to have slowed way down and I like
> things being improved as quickly as possible.
One item (amongst many) that chased me away from W
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 18:55:43 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
> - why didn't portage replace the old version itself? That's generally
> part of the update process.
GnuPG is slotted, so 1.* and 2.* can be installed simultaneously.
> - once I manually unmerged gnupg, what brings it back? I did
On Dec 15, 2007 6:55 PM, Walter Dnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just did an "emerge --sync", and checked what was available for
> updateing...
>
> [m3000][root][~] emerge --ask --deep --update --world
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating world dependencie
I just did an "emerge --sync", and checked what was available for
updateing...
[m3000][root][~] emerge --ask --deep --update --world
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating world dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ] sys-devel/gnuconfig-20070724 [20070118]
[ebuild
Hi - Can anyone give me pointers on how to get ipw2100-firmware working
with kernel-genkernel-x86-2.6.22-gentoo-r9? It works fine with
kernel-genkernel-x86-2.6.22-gentoo-r8 where it's compiled in the kernel
but the same set-up fails in kernel-genkernel-x86-2.6.22-gentoo-r9. When
I run emerge ipw210
Hi there!
I just tried to upgrade my mythtv installation, but the ebuild fails in the
unpack phase with a permission denied-error when accessing the
svn-repository:
>>> Emerging (1 of 2) media-tv/mythtv-0.20.2_p14814 to /
* checking ebuild checksums ;-) ... [ ok ]
* checking auxfile checks
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 11:41:21 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> > Maybe his/her laptop doesn't stand the
> > thermal output of its CPU when emerging or maybe he/she's the
> > administrator of a large company's network, trying to move every
> > computer system to Gentoo.
>
> Check out distccd!
How do
Randy Barlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I mean if
>> you connect it to any machine in the diagram or elsewhere wouldn't you
>> be exposing that machine to the unfiltered internet?
>
> I think that's the idea here - to see the difference between the two
> sides of the
On Saturday 15 December 2007, Randy Barlow wrote:
> It's not too hard to start a separate instance of apache. You just
> copy /etc/init.d/apache2 to, say, /etc/init.d/backuppcApache2.
> Likewise copy the /etc/conf.d scripts, and change in the backuppc one
> the reference to the httpd.conf to, sa
On 15:27 Thu 13 Dec , Jason Carson wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Where in the kernel config (make menuconfig) do I find the choice for
> schedulers. The one I am currently using is "Anticipatory". What is the
> newest and latest scheduler for 2.6.23?
>
> Regards,
>
> Jason Carson
>
> --
> [EMAIL
Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> (btw, do gentoo initscripts
> support starting multiple instances of a daemon, perhaps under different
> users and using different parameters? I'd not bet on it, but I may be
> wrong. If it's not supported, waiting for baselayout to support this may
> take a long time, so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I mean if
> you connect it to any machine in the diagram or elsewhere wouldn't you
> be exposing that machine to the unfiltered internet?
I think that's the idea here - to see the difference between the two
sides of the router. As far as getting that data safely in a vi
Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 14 December 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> Would I likely be opening my lan up for some christmas shopping by
>> >> having a gentoo guest on a WinXP host running as a DMZ machine?
>> >> It would be pretty barebo
b.n. gmail.com> writes:
> > I offered to take over the maintenance of the package and web installation
> > page, and was turned down (probable by some punk under the age of 20)
> Sad. Can you link the thread?
I think that would be counter productive. It's the 'culture of gentoo' that
en
On Saturday 15 December 2007, Randy Barlow wrote:
> Yeah, that's the kinds of differences of opinion that are in the bug
> report, which is part of what makes this a more difficult ebuild to
> write. Things like libraries are really easy because it's just a
> configure make make install, but here
Grant gmail.com> writes:
> Multiple great ideas have already been suggested in this thread. Is
> this the first time they've been conceived and shared? Why hasn't
> work begun on them? Why isn't work completed on them? Because living
> costs money and Gentoo doesn't pay.
> I've been in busin
> > The real blocker for features that I'd like Gentoo to support is Portage.
> > There is only 1½ people working on it and changing anything in it is hard
> > because Portage is a horrible mess. There's plenty of activity in the tree
> > but new desired features cannot be used in the tree until Po
> > So, what would need to happen for one of these projects to take off
> > would be one or more people to be in charge of it and organize it, and
> > they recruit as many people as possible to work on the project along
> > with them?
>
> The real blocker for features that I'd like Gentoo to suppor
Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> Ah ok, I just thought it would be easier, to get things going and catch
> up with upstream, to release an ebuild that only supports the suid mode
> of operation, and then, taking the necessary time, improve it in future
> releases, rather than supporting all the features r
On Saturday 15 December 2007, Randy Barlow wrote:
> Yes, I am aware of that. The BackupPC ebuild should support either
> way, as there is a speedup of about 15x (according to the BackupPC
> author) when running the webserver as user backuppc. There should be
> a USE variable controlling this. A
Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> (Apologies if this has already been mentioned)
> Another (maybe less intrusive, although slightly less efficient) option
> is to install the BackupPC_Admin CGI as setuid so that it runs as user
> backuppc (this is how I run BackupPC-2.1.2-r1). This does not require a
> dif
On Saturday 15 December 2007, Randy Barlow wrote:
> One of the challenging things about the BackupPC ebuild is that the
> program needs to be configured to work with its own instance of apache
> (run as user backuppc), and I think none of the ebuild contributors
> are all too sure of the standard
Florian Philipp wrote:
> Maybe his/her laptop doesn't stand the
> thermal output of its CPU when emerging or maybe he/she's the
> administrator of a large company's network, trying to move every
> computer system to Gentoo.
Check out distccd!
--
Randy Barlow
http://electronsweatshop.com
--
[EMA
On Saturday 15 December 2007, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2007 3:46 PM, Kenneth Prugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are you using the sky2 driver for your NIC by chance?
>
> Nope, I've tried a tulip and a 3COM NIC. Pretty run-of-the-mill. :-)
Since you seem to have checked that the problem
Hans de Graaff wrote:
> A possible solution would be for you (or someone) to become a proxy
> maintainer, meaning that you'd get the bug reports and provide new
> ebuilds, and a developer (most likely someone from the backup herd) would
> review it and put it in the tree.
Hi Hans, thanks for th
On Saturday 15 December 2007 15:05:28 Grant wrote:
> > Neil correctly translated my pseudo-English to what I actually meant. I
> > don't want to make Portage binary based. I just want to make Portage's
> > binary package support more conveniently usable on big networks.
Even eclasses in the tree d
> >> > Lately I've been shopping around for other distros as well as looking
> >> > at *BSD. Gentoo development seems to have slowed way down and I like
> >> > things being improved as quickly as possible. FreeBSD is supposed to
> >> > be the closest relation, but even that won't do. I don't thi
On Friday 14 December 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Would I likely be opening my lan up for some christmas shopping by
> >> having a gentoo guest on a WinXP host running as a DMZ machine?
> >> It would be pretty barebones with a IPTABLE setup for logging and
> > > > That is when you compile it on another machine then install it on the
> > > > laptop. The -K option comes to mind here.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Which is what I think the OP was talking about. If you install one of the
> > > *-bin packages from portage, you are protected by the checksums in the
On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 07:06 -0600, Dale wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 03:44:55 -0600, Dale wrote:
> >
> >
> > > That is when you compile it on another machine then install it on the
> > > laptop. The -K option comes to mind here.
> > >
> >
> > Which is what I t
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 03:44:55 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
>
>> That is when you compile it on another machine then install it on the
>> laptop. The -K option comes to mind here.
>>
>
> Which is what I think the OP was talking about. If you install one of the
> *-bin package
On Saturday 15 December 2007 03:35:51 Grant wrote:
> My ideas aren't really important unless they're everyone else's ideas
> too.
What is it exactly you want to achieve by starting these pointless threads?
--
Bo Andresen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 03:44:55 -0600, Dale wrote:
> That is when you compile it on another machine then install it on the
> laptop. The -K option comes to mind here.
Which is what I think the OP was talking about. If you install one of the
*-bin packages from portage, you are protected by the che
> > I love gentoo and can't settle for anything else. What can I do to
> > make sure development doesn't stop?
>
> Let me in on that. What can I do too?
Help out with bugfixing by submitting patches or even just
confirming bugs and supplying needed details?
Join testing teams? Join the Weekly N
Florian Philipp wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 18:13 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
>> Florian Philipp wrote:
>>
>>> Okay, here it goes:
>>>
>>> I think we could need a better support for binary packages.
>>> There was a thread in here a few months ago about how to offer binary
>>> packages for cust
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 18:13 -0600, Dale wrote:
> Florian Philipp wrote:
> >
> > Okay, here it goes:
> >
> > I think we could need a better support for binary packages.
> > There was a thread in here a few months ago about how to offer binary
> > packages for customers. As far as I remember the pr
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 01:05:08 +0100, b.n. wrote:
> Florian Philipp ha scritto:
>
>> Other things to improve? A better documentation on USE-flags. In my
>> opinion every maintainer should provide as much information as possible
>> on what exactly a USE-flag changes. At the moment it's the
>> admini
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:56:41 -0800, Grant wrote:
>> > Lately I've been shopping around for other distros as well as looking
>> > at *BSD. Gentoo development seems to have slowed way down and I like
>> > things being improved as quickly as possible. FreeBSD is supposed to
>> > be the closest rela
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 21:07:53 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
>> My concerns with this, other than my abilities, are:
>
>> 1. Showing proper respect to the guy who pioneered the effort to date,
>> and who may simply be out of town. (This disrespect would be alleviated
>> if there
44 matches
Mail list logo
