>> I had this problem and solved it by deleting ~/.gnome ~/.gnome2 and
~/.gnome2_private
Hi, I have the same problem here. Deleting the files help, but not for
long. After 3-4 Logins without any problem, the problem returns.
regards
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Randy Barlow wrote:
> Randy Barlow wrote:
>> I see a package called mime-types, but it seems to install
>> /etc/mime.types and not /etc/apache2/mime.types... Help?
>
> I found a temporary solution by symlinking /etc/apache2/mime.types to
> /etc/mime.types, but that doesn't seem like the correct w
Randy Barlow wrote:
> I see a package called mime-types, but it seems to install
> /etc/mime.types and not /etc/apache2/mime.types... Help?
I found a temporary solution by symlinking /etc/apache2/mime.types to
/etc/mime.types, but that doesn't seem like the correct way to go...
--
Randy Barlow
Hi! I just upgraded from Apache 2.0.x to 2.2.6 and am working out
kinks. Right now I see
* Caching service dependencies ... [ ok ]
* Starting apache2 ... [ !! ]
There is nothing in /var/log/messages and /var/log/apache2/error_log shows
[Sun Oct 07 22:51:36 200
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 01:50 +0200, Matthias Langer wrote:
> i'm wondering if anyone else has this problem, or even better, a
> solution for it:
>
> since i've upgraded to gnome-2.18.x i have to start metacity manually at
> least sometimes after logging in. that is, in about 1 of 4 logins, i
> don'
On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 17:25 -0700, Hex Star wrote:
> You should take note of the error message that occurs when you
> experience this problem and paste the error msg here
well, that would be indeed a very good idea; however, i don't start
gnome from a terminal but from gdm and i don't know where t
You should take note of the error message that occurs when you experience
this problem and paste the error msg here
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 09:26:33PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> A total non-issue in my experience. I've never had an LVM problem yet,
> but maybe I'm just lucky. The one thing you do need to be aware of it
> that you require LVM support at boot time or shortly thereafter. So
> either compile
i'm wondering if anyone else has this problem, or even better, a
solution for it:
since i've upgraded to gnome-2.18.x i have to start metacity manually at
least sometimes after logging in. that is, in about 1 of 4 logins, i
don't have a usable desktop till i type "metacity" into some terminal.
ap
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sunday 07 October 2007, Florian Philipp wrote:
- You loose bit performance, but not much, you won't feel it without
benchmarks.
I very much doubt this. LVM is one extra layer between the filesystem
and the physical disk and it basically consists of a mapping b
On Montag, 8. Oktober 2007, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > But(!) you should not downgrade headers, this can cause very
> > severe problems.
>
> Could you give an example?
ok, example. I might be totally wrong, so don't believe me:
The splice system call was added with
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> But(!) you should not downgrade headers, this can cause very
> severe problems.
Could you give an example?
Benno
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Mick wrote:
> Can you please advise what I could do to block IP addresses that have
> repeatedly failed to log in?
You can also have a look at denyhosts...
--
Randy Barlow
http://electronsweatshop.com
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=howto+secure+ssh&btnG=Google+Search
On Sunday 07 October 2007, pat wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Time to time I have problem with mplayer. The sound for some video
> files doesn't work (mainly for DVDs). The problem is:
> ***
> Requested audio codec family [a52] (afm=liba52) not available.
> Enable it at compilation.
> Requested audio codec fa
On Sunday 07 October 2007, Philip Webb wrote:
> Does anyone have advice based on experience using LVM ?
The majority of folks around here will have used LVM :-)
> I sb partitioning a new 320 GB hard drive soon for a simple desktop
> box. That is 8 times the size of the HDD in my present machi
On Sunday 07 October 2007, Remy Blank wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > I have already disabled PAM authentication on sshd so that only users
> > with a public key in their ~/.ssh can login.
>
> This is the first and most important step. This means that the only real
> problem is that your logs fill with fa
On Sunday 07 October 2007, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Philip Webb schrieb:
> > Does anyone have advice based on experience using LVM ?
> Simple pros and cons?
>
> Pro:
> - You loose bit performance, but not much, you won't feel it without
> benchmarks.
I very much doubt this. LVM is one extra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mick wrote:
> I have already disabled PAM authentication on sshd so that only users with a
> public key in their ~/.ssh can login.
This is the first and most important step. This means that the only real
problem is that your logs fill with failed log
Hi,
Does /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Scalar/Util.pm exist? What is the
output of
perl -le 'print foreach @INC'
By the way, I run urxvt fine with the Scalar::Util that comes with perl.
do you have something like
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i686-linux-thread-multi/auto/List/Util/Util.so
Moshe
At Sun, 07 Oct 2007 16:06:41 +0200 Volker Armin Hemmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> the linux-headers and the kernel are completly off -sync. There is no harm in
> using headers with a higher/lower version number.
> But(!) you should not downgrade headers, this can cause very severe problems.
Philip Webb schrieb:
Does anyone have advice based on experience using LVM ?
I sb partitioning a new 320 GB hard drive soon for a simple desktop box.
That is 8 times the size of the HDD in my present machine,
which I haven't exhausted by any means. LVM seems more professional
& allows flexib
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 23:13:21 +0800
"Chuanwen Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > yes - there are (were?) a few incompatibilities still with 64 bit
> > os'es that dont exist with 32 bit. Basicly, there still doesnt
> > seem to be a compelling reason to go 64bit for a desktop at the
> > moment. Serv
Hello William Kenworthy,
> Basicly, there still doesnt seem to be a
> compelling reason to go 64bit for a desktop at the moment.
Doesn't that rather depend on your intended use of the desktop? Some apps
benefit greatly fro the 64 bit environment.
--
Neil Bothwick
The best antiques are old fri
2007/10/7, William Kenworthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 20:07 +0800, Chuanwen Wu wrote:
> > 2007/10/7, William Kenworthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Hi had the smae problem on a dell with this chipset. Its not so much
> > > the chipset, but that the dell has a gap in the numbering
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> pat schrieb:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Time to time I have problem with mplayer. The sound for some video files
>> doesn't
>> work (mainly for DVDs). The problem is:
>> ***
>> Requested audio codec family [a52] (afm=liba52) not available.
>> Enable it at compilation.
>> Requested a
On Sonntag, 7. Oktober 2007, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 23:38:33 -0700
>
> "Hex Star" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There is no harm in doing so :)
>
> If you say such things, please add a short explanation what makes you
> think that. After all this isn't IRC.
>
> In fa
Dnia 2007-10-07, o godz. 15:45:50
pat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał(a):
> Hello,
>
> Time to time I have problem with mplayer. The sound for some video
> files doesn't work (mainly for DVDs). The problem is:
> ***
> Requested audio codec family [a52] (afm=liba52) not available.
> Enable it at compi
Hello,
Time to time I have problem with mplayer. The sound for some video files doesn't
work (mainly for DVDs). The problem is:
***
Requested audio codec family [a52] (afm=liba52) not available.
Enable it at compilation.
Requested audio codec family [ac3] (afm=libac3) not available.
Enable it at c
On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 20:07 +0800, Chuanwen Wu wrote:
> 2007/10/7, William Kenworthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi had the smae problem on a dell with this chipset. Its not so much
> > the chipset, but that the dell has a gap in the numbering of devices
> > attached to it that the livecd cant deal w
Hi,
Am Sonntag, 07. Okt 2007, 10:40:10 +0100 schrieb Mick:
> Can you please advise what I could do to block IP addresses that have
> repeatedly failed to log in? I am looking here at a server which over the
> last week is being attacked daily with random usernames. So the only
> constant in t
2007/10/7, William Kenworthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi had the smae problem on a dell with this chipset. Its not so much
> the chipset, but that the dell has a gap in the numbering of devices
> attached to it that the livecd cant deal with.
>
> The cure was to boot from a redhat 7 livecd and insta
Never had a problem with LVM.
On a mythTV box with LVM, started with 80GB IDE, then added in a 300Gb
IDE, then a few months later another 300mb, sata this time. Basicly
transparent to Myth
I have avoided LVM on laptops before now because its extra complexity
and I'll never add multiple disks.
B
On Sunday 07 October 2007, Elias Probst wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 7. Oktober 2007 11:40:10 schrieb Mick:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Can you please advise what I could do to block IP addresses that have
> > repeatedly failed to log in?
>
> I think you're looking for: net-analyzer/fail2ban (http://www.fail2ban.o
On Sunday 07 October 2007, Philip Webb wrote:
> Does anyone have advice based on experience using LVM ?
> I sb partitioning a new 320 GB hard drive soon for a simple desktop box.
> That is 8 times the size of the HDD in my present machine,
> which I haven't exhausted by any means. LVM seems mo
Hi,
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 23:38:33 -0700
"Hex Star" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no harm in doing so :)
If you say such things, please add a short explanation what makes you
think that. After all this isn't IRC.
In fact, I would not suggest doing that. While kernel developers do
their bes
Does anyone have advice based on experience using LVM ?
I sb partitioning a new 320 GB hard drive soon for a simple desktop box.
That is 8 times the size of the HDD in my present machine,
which I haven't exhausted by any means. LVM seems more professional
& allows flexibility for unforeseen st
071007 Florian Philipp wrote:
> Philip Webb schrieb:
>> more generally you could try to install from Knoppix
>> -- that's what I used when I installed my current system 4 years ago --
>> or the simple but powerful System Rescue ( http://www.sysresccd.org/ ),
>> which I plan to use when I install Ge
If you have iptables available in your kernel, a quick manual step could be
to block all traffic incoming from that IP address. A statement like the
following could work:
iptables -I INPUT -s XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX -j DROP
(This drops all traffic coming from IP address XXX... effectively, it simply
loo
Am Sonntag, 7. Oktober 2007 11:40:10 schrieb Mick:
> Hi All,
>
> Can you please advise what I could do to block IP addresses that have
> repeatedly failed to log in?
I think you're looking for: net-analyzer/fail2ban (http://www.fail2ban.org)
Regards, Elias P.
--
A really nice number:
"09:F9:11:
Hi All,
Can you please advise what I could do to block IP addresses that have
repeatedly failed to log in? I am looking here at a server which over the
last week is being attacked daily with random usernames. So the only
constant in these repeated attempts is not the username, but the IP addr
Philip Webb schrieb:
071007 Chuanwen Wu wrote:
The chipset is ICH8.
So,is there anyway you see I can install gentoo on my machine?
You have an informed reply re your Dell, which I don't know,
but more generally you could try to install from Knoppix
-- that's what I used when I installed my cur
071007 Chuanwen Wu wrote:
> The chipset is ICH8.
> So,is there anyway you see I can install gentoo on my machine?
You have an informed reply re your Dell, which I don't know,
but more generally you could try to install from Knoppix
-- that's what I used when I installed my current system 4 years a
Hi Dan,
Dan Farrell wrote:
> AFAIK you are correct, this is a bug in a few of the initscripts that
> don't behave sensibly if the root fs is network mounted.
thx for your answer a raised a bug report with the number: 194967.
Bye
Matthias
--
"Programming today is a race between software eng
Hi had the smae problem on a dell with this chipset. Its not so much
the chipset, but that the dell has a gap in the numbering of devices
attached to it that the livecd cant deal with.
The cure was to boot from a redhat 7 livecd and install from that.
Worked fine. Also, dell has a "legacy" mode
The chipset is ICH8.
So,is there anyway you see I can install gentoo on my machine?
I have install Red Flag.But it 's i686 but not x86_64,so I can't
chroot from the Red Flag to install Gentoo.
2007/10/7, Hex Star <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello, you probably have a recent chipset (blanking on name cu
46 matches
Mail list logo
