Is there a tool to query a portage to get a list of all packages which
have 'testing' or 'stable' status for x86 and have 'not available' or
'hard masked' status for amd64?
=== On Wednesday 20 December 2006 01:38, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
===
...
> Is it smart to hope "Gentoo AMD64 F
On 20 December 2006 03:58, Grant wrote:
> I think other posters to this thread may be trying to compile a
> similar set of statistics, but I'll just come out and say it. Can we
> compare historical data on the number of Gentoo users and the rate of
> Gentoo maintenance and growth? Conceptually,
Colleen Beamer wrote:
> Grant wrote:
>
I
personally still love Gentoo.
> Well, I don't know anything ... I'm just a lowly user, not a tech
> I'd never compiled a kernel before using Gentoo or wrote a configuration
> file.
>
> However, I have to say that, for me, Gent
Anyone using an Apple USB keyboard with Gentoo Linux?
Specifically, Im running XFCE4 and want to figure out how to map some
keys and get some missing functionality. How can I set these up with
X11/XFCE? Also, I can't seem to switch between X11 and the console (I
think I can't even switch consoles
Can you help with this please?
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-3793329.html#3793329
thanks
LN
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wednesday, 20 December 2006 6:07, Jakob wrote:
> On 12/19/06, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The problem is that glxgears is not a benchmark. Run some real programs
> > and if
> > you have performance problems with those, then you have something to
> > worry about.
> >
> >
Grant wrote:
>> > I
>> > personally still love Gentoo.
>>
Well, I don't know anything ... I'm just a lowly user, not a tech
I'd never compiled a kernel before using Gentoo or wrote a configuration
file.
However, I have to say that, for me, Gentoo is hands down the easiest
distro to maintain.
> I've caught a whiff or two lately that Gentoo is declining in
> popularity amongst users and developers. Is it all in my head? I
> personally still love Gentoo.
AFAICT, it's still a favorite of Grants everywhere
--
Grant Edwards
{OT}
Have you noticed that Grants love other Grants? I
> I
> personally still love Gentoo.
What's the problem then? :)
Can we agree that active developers are good for Gentoo, and the more
the better?
I think other posters to this thread may be trying to compile a
similar set of statistics, but I'll just come out and say it. Can we
compare histor
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 18:56, "W.Kenworthy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo':
> Is it still the case thats its impossible to upgrade a 32bit gentoo on
> athlon64 to 64 bit - requires a full reinstall?
Reinstall is the only officially supported manner.
Howe
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 21:58 +0100, Jakob wrote:
> On 12/19/06, Jakob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 12/19/06, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:48, Jakob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
...
> for now I will stick with 32bit, I think I will Install 6
On 12/19/06, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 14:46, Andrew Gaydenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo':
> What is your "strategical vision" to this (use C2D as 32-bit or
> 64-bit) alternatives?
All (well, very nearly
Thanks, I'll give it a try.
Gabriel
Adam Carter wrote:
I had a similar issue with the gnome clock, I tried a number of things
to get it working but I think revdep-rebuild -X was the winner. Emerge
gentoolkit if you don't have it.
HTH,
Adam
-Original Message-
From: Gabriel Rosset
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 00:09, Joel Osburn wrote:
> > From: Maurice E Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 3:03 PM
> >
> > Might I suggest trying the following prior to your normal
> > (I assume genkernel) build process.
>
> I don't use genkernel, never have.
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 11:27 +0300, Andrey Gerasimenko wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:27:20 +0300, Hemmann, Volker Armin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (there is a report somewhere in the thread that the number of
> developers increased from 60 to 300 in 3 days, but a finer time scale is
> o
Picasa does awesome mosaics.
Alan
On 12/20/06, Kumar Golap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Have you tried hugin
http://hugin.sourceforge.net/
I think its in portage
Kumar
On 12/14/06, Arnau Bria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:30:17 +
> Redouane Boumghar wrote:
>
> > Hel
> From: Maurice E Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 3:03 PM
> Might I suggest trying the following prior to your normal
> (I assume genkernel) build process.
I don't use genkernel, never have. I did try the following:
copy the .config to another directory,
Might I suggest trying the following prior to your normal (I assume
genkernel) build process.
cd to /usr/src/linux
as root type make mrproper
This will ensure that your build tree is pristene.
Now you should be able to run genkernel without problems.
--- Begin Message ---
I have an Opteron 242
Have you tried hugin
http://hugin.sourceforge.net/
I think its in portage
Kumar
On 12/14/06, Arnau Bria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:30:17 +
Redouane Boumghar wrote:
> Hello Arnau
Hi,
> I'm sorry I didn't understand what you were looking for.
It's ok, I must improv
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 14:46, Andrew Gaydenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo':
> What is your "strategical vision" to this (use C2D as 32-bit or
> 64-bit) alternatives?
All (well, very nearly all) the software I need is available in 64-bit
versions, parti
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 14:56, Jakob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo':
> do I have to run emerge -avuD world after changing to -march=prescott?
No, that's not required.
--
"If there's one thing we've established over the years,
it's that the vast majority
On 12/19/06, Jakob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/19/06, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:48, Jakob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> about 'Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo':
> > Thaks for the quick reply.
> > On http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags t
On 12/19/06, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:48, Jakob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo':
> Thaks for the quick reply.
> On http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags they say for 32bit use:
> CFLAGS="-march=prescott -O2 -
What is your "strategical vision" to this (use C2D as 32-bit or
64-bit) alternatives? Is it smart to hope "Gentoo AMD64 FAQ" will
be thiner and thiner during upcoming months? :-)
=== On Tuesday 19 December 2006 23:13, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: ===
... Of course, it's
getting harder a
On 12:53 Tue 19 Dec , Steve [Gentoo] wrote:
> I apologise in advance for this question being tenuously related to
> Gentoo... My justification is only that I really like my Gentoo-based
> Postfix /dovecot mail-server... but I also want to push emails to a
> connected Windows Mobile 5 PDA/pho
My portage overlay has moved from git.jhcloos.org to freedesktop.org.
If you have a clone, please edit .git/remotes/origin and replace the
old URL with either of:
git://people.freedesktop.org/~cloos/overlay.git
http://people.freedesktop.org/~cloos/overlay.git
(http is there for those wh
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:48, Jakob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo':
> Thaks for the quick reply.
> On http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags they say for 32bit use:
> CFLAGS="-march=prescott -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
> Is this wat you meant for better -m
On 12/19/06, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:18, Jakob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo':
> I have a Core2Duo T5600 1,83 MHz in my notebook. Today I read on the
> GentooWeeklyNewsletter to use "-march=nocona (and an am
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On 12/19/06, Joel Osburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have an Opteron 242 system, to which I recently added a
> second processor and some more memory. I figured that to
> take advantage of that processor, all I needed to do was
> recompile to kernel, reboot
On 12/19/06, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 December 2006 9:42, Jakob wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a strage problem, some month ago I bougth a new laptop (Core2duo
> 1,83 Ghz + Geforce 7600).
> The first thing I did was installing gentoo, and after X was finished
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:18, Jakob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo':
> I have a Core2Duo T5600 1,83 MHz in my notebook. Today I read on the
> GentooWeeklyNewsletter to use "-march=nocona (and an amd64 profile) for
> Core 2 Solo/Duo"
> 3. They mentiont to use a
Hi all,
I have a Core2Duo T5600 1,83 MHz in my notebook. Today I read on the
GentooWeeklyNewsletter to use "-march=nocona (and an amd64 profile) for Core
2 Solo/Duo"
Currently I'm using:
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium-m -pipe"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"
MAKEOPTS="-j3"
and
/usr/po
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 22:35 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> x86_64 is the generic name for amd64, emt64, and x64 (see below) so that is
> correct for the CHOST setting for that architecture. Chips using that
> architecture are also generally happy running as a x86 CHOST.
>
> For Itanium
What is it?
eix says "Framebuffer internationalized terminal emulator" and the
homepage is supposed to be
"http://www-124.ibm.com/linux/projects/iterm/";
It seems this is a IBM decoy, since it gets mercilessly redirected to
http://www.ibm.com/us/
(I really really hate this kind of behaviour!)
An
On AD 2006 December 19 Tuesday 05:23:10 PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> AFAICT, it's still a favorite of Grants everywhere
I'll grant you that.
Justin
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 12/19/06, Joel Osburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have an Opteron 242 system, to which I recently added a second processor and some more
memory. I figured that to take advantage of that processor, all I needed to do was
recompile to kernel, reboot, and set "-j3" in the make.conf file.
How
On 2006-12-18, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've caught a whiff or two lately that Gentoo is declining in
> popularity amongst users and developers. Is it all in my head? I
> personally still love Gentoo.
AFAICT, it's still a favorite of Grants everywhere
--
Grant Edwards
On 2006-12-17, Luigi Pinna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can I burn a 8.5 GByte iso? I tried with k3b and I receive an error
> and growisofs failed at 99.9% with input/output error.
Growisofs works fine on dual-layer DVDs for me.
I did have some failures when using a drive that was in an
e
I have an Opteron 242 system, to which I recently added a second processor and
some more memory. I figured that to take advantage of that processor, all I
needed to do was recompile to kernel, reboot, and set "-j3" in the make.conf
file.
However, there must be something else, since when I try
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:07:08 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Of course, all of this is terribly interesting and has absolutely
> nothing to do with the OPs question :-)
Making this a typical mailing list thread ;-)
--
Neil Bothwick
PC DOS Error #04: Out of disk space. Delete Windows? (Y)es (H)
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 December 2006 14:10, Dale wrote:
>
>
>> It seems to be thinking it is getting a bad download. Is this a bug
>> or is it just me? It does the same thing each time, downloads it
>> then pukes it out. Since I am on this slow dial-up and it takes
>> about 2 ho
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:27:04AM +0300, Andrey Gerasimenko wrote:
> Where can I get data on the number of Gentoo users and how it changes with
> time? Are the sync servers reporting the number of portage trees? Are the
> numbers of subscribers to Gentoo mailing lists available? Can the number
Mark Knecht wrote:
> On 12/19/06, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 19 December 2006 22:40, Dale wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > Has anybody else ran into this?
>> >
>> > [snip]
>> >
>> > It seems to be thinking it is getting a bad download. Is this a
>> bug or
>> > is it ju
>> Mick wrote:
>> > # iwlist wlan0 scan
>> > wlan0 Scan completed :
>> > Cell 01 - Address: 00:0C:20:03:3B:C5
>> > ESSID:"The Cairngorm Hotel"
>> > Mode:Master
>> > Frequency:2.437 GHz
>> >
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 14:10, Dale wrote:
> It seems to be thinking it is getting a bad download. Is this a bug
> or is it just me? It does the same thing each time, downloads it
> then pukes it out. Since I am on this slow dial-up and it takes
> about 2 hours for this download, I would ra
I apologise in advance for this question being tenuously related to
Gentoo... My justification is only that I really like my Gentoo-based
Postfix /dovecot mail-server... but I also want to push emails to a
connected Windows Mobile 5 PDA/phone.
Historically mobile devices have polled for email
On 12/19/06, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 December 2006 22:40, Dale wrote:
> Hi
>
> Has anybody else ran into this?
>
> [snip]
>
> It seems to be thinking it is getting a bad download. Is this a bug or
> is it just me? It does the same thing each time, downloa
On Tuesday, 19 December 2006 22:40, Dale wrote:
> Hi
>
> Has anybody else ran into this?
>
> [snip]
>
> It seems to be thinking it is getting a bad download. Is this a bug or
> is it just me? It does the same thing each time, downloads it then
> pukes it out. Since I am on this slow dial-up and
On 12/18/06, Randy Barlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 18 December 2006 21:52, Mark Knecht wrote:
>The commands are unclear to me in the sense that I may need to
> rebuild the kernel, or not, after running them. I cannot tell. Any
> idea?
Well, before running make oldconfig, you shou
Hi
Has anybody else ran into this?
> >>> Emerging (488 of 792) x11-misc/googleearth-4_beta to /
> >>> Resuming download...
> >>> Downloading 'http://dl.google.com/earth/GE4/GoogleEarthLinux.bin'
> --04:47:57-- http://dl.google.com/earth/GE4/GoogleEarthLinux.bin
>=> `/usr/portage/dist
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:31, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:06:05 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > My desktop machine at home is still on 2005.0 profile and yet, it
> > is a fully up to date x86 system. If I were to make it a 2006.1
> > profile, it's very unlikely that anything
El Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:06:05 +0200
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> First, why do you want to downgrade from i686 to i586? Do you have an
> original pentium chip and you specified i686 by mistake? There's no
> other valid reason I can think of for such a downgrade.
>
Unless there i
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:12, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 December 2006 12:06, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > But, if you insist, you can do this:
> >
> > 1. Change your CHOST in /etc/make.conf
> > 2. Change the /etc/make.profile symplink to point to the profile of
> > your choice in /
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:06:05 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> My desktop machine at home is still on 2005.0 profile and yet, it is a
> fully up to date x86 system. If I were to make it a 2006.1 profile,
> it's very unlikely that anything would change at all.
In this case, I expect there would be c
On Monday 18 December 2006 23:19, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > # iwlist wlan0 scan
> > wlan0 Scan completed :
> > Cell 01 - Address: 00:0C:20:03:3B:C5
> > ESSID:"The Cairngorm Hotel"
> > Mode:Master
> > Frequency:2
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 03:22:24 +0100, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> > emerge gentoo-bugger
> > bugger --keyword mod_perl
> > bugger --show 157239
>
> I prefer www-client/pybugz.
>
> # emerge pybugz
> # bugz search mod_perl
> # bugz get 157239
Nice :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Unix is user-friendly. It
Mark, just a note I am quite happy with x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-1.0.8776
working perfectly on oldy MX 440, because legacy drivers too much legacy and
are no good with both X session switching and GL while 1.0.9631 just crash
and 1.0.9742 do not support the card anymore. Since it is probably
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 12:06, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> But, if you insist, you can do this:
>
> 1. Change your CHOST in /etc/make.conf
> 2. Change the /etc/make.profile symplink to point to the profile of your
> choice in /usr/portage/profiles
> 3. emerge -e system ; emerge -e world
Whoa! Your
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 12:38, Christian Nygaard wrote:
> If you have a Gentoo system with a specific release point for e.g.
> 2006.0and you would like to live upgrade it so it confirms to a
> 2006.1 profile is that possible?
You appear to misunderstand what a profile is. It's nothing more tha
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 11:38, Christian Nygaard wrote:
> If you have a Gentoo system with a specific release point for e.g.
> 2006.0and you would like to live upgrade it so it confirms to a 2006.1
> profile is that possible?
You just change the profile. The differences in the profiles between
If you have a Gentoo system with a specific release point for e.g. 2006.0and
you would like to live upgrade it so it confirms to a 2006.1 profile is that
possible?
To be specific I would like if possible to have a live upgrade to stage3 but
with
using i586 compile instead of i686. I could rm -rf
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 23:18:19 +, Jeff Rollin wrote:
> On 18/12/06, John J. Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > It may, but you are confusing cause and effect. A distro with more
> > > developers should be a better distro, and should have more users.
> > >
> > Well, Microsoft has proven that theor
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:27:20 +0300, Hemmann, Volker Armin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 18 December 2006 15:47, Grant wrote:
I've caught a whiff or two lately that Gentoo is declining in
popularity amongst users and developers. Is it all in my head? I
personally still love Gentoo.
63 matches
Mail list logo
