bugs about the upstream driver. If the
driver does not work, then see the nVidia news forum.
We hope you will find this approach a more streamlined and
easy implementation for nVidia.
Thanks for your participation and feedback.
Peter Hyman on behalf of the nVidia devs.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:47:40 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:41:45PM -0500, Peter wrote:
>> We are in the process of developing and testing
>> a unified nVidia driver ebuild. When implemented,
>> it will replace the nvidia-kernel, nvidia-glx, an
roach nvidia takes.
>
>
>> Thanks for your participation and feedback.
>>
>> Peter Hyman on behalf of the nVidia devs.
>
> The nVidia devs? Is upstream pushing this? Why? What is the point?
No, nVidia devs are Kris and the x11-driver group.
>
> -Steve
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 20:13:45 +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 14:05 -0500, Peter wrote:
>> in any case. By unifying the ebuilds, we are merely duplicating what
>> nvidia provides in its install packages. We're not doing anything they
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:16:53 -0600, Dale wrote:
> Niklas Bolander wrote:
snip...
> I have to agree. Do it sort of like KDE, with kde, kde-meta or as
> seperate packages. Have it so you can pull in all three in one emerge
> command but have the option to do it seperately as well. I have only
>
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 13:09:36 +0100, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> On Saturday 24 December 2005 12:34, Peter wrote:
>> THAT is a very reasonable comment!
>
> Not at all. "Meta ebuilds" are a provisional and fugly workaround as long as
> we have to wait for proper sets and
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 14:09:01 +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
snip...
>> nVidia upstream combines all the products together
>> in their .run files. There is minimal time difference between having the
>> entire suite installed versus each one individually.
> Well depends how you see it.
> I
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:50:16 +0100, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:49:04PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
>> I thought that we (gentoo devs) were trying to split the modules from
>> ebuilds,
>> so that people don't need to waste time with userland when rebuildi
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:06:43 +0100, Pawe Madej wrote:
> In my opinion if you want to build monolitic ebuild in system like
> gentoo where everything is going to be modular you should try some local
> USE flags for example monolitic to install all the stuff you are puting
> into it and of cours fla
ly use = and mask a
specific version. Using >= is dicey since you would miss an upgrade.
However, from the way I use gentoo, having an automated system would be
quite counterintuitive. Semi-automated? Sure thing. In any event, still
beats the $#^%@ out of RPMs!
Good luck.
--
Peter
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Or, perhaps, as happens with many people, it was just time. Time to move
on. That happens, and it's perfectly normal. But that it was your time to
"eject" does not imply there's any trouble here.
Good luck with your Source Mage. For me, getting involved with a new beta
project does not fit in with day to day requirements of a stable, running
system.
--
Peter
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
ke Ben and Jerry's or Gateway. Cows are cool.
I agree. Bring him back.
--
Peter
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 07 May 2006 21:51:21 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 07 May 2006 16:08:52 -0400 Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | In fact, the only REALLY negative thing that
> | happened was when Ciaran ripped me a new a---hole because he objected
> | to the line spacing I
There appear to be certain policy issues that the council needs to
resolve.
So, while I am not endorsing pablum, at least let's cut the thread. I see
nothing useful coming from it anymore.
--
Peter
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
eal work around here. If you don't have anything
> useful to contribute, shut up and go away.
>
Ciaram, I was actually sticking up for you and spb. I said nothing about
you or anyone else -- just the project. As usual though, you take
something and turn it into something it isn't an
ey (like I know Slackware has and some other distros to ensure
the authenticity of their files)?
TIA
--
Peter
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
so.
Sorry. I said this would be brief, and I suppose I lied. However, I hope
someone might get a good thought or two from this (or a good laugh at my
naivete!). And thanks Patrick for helping with your feedback and getting
me to focus on some of these ideas a little more. HTH
--
Peter
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, 20 May 2006 15:37:54 +0100, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> On 20/05/06, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> PMFJI, but as a user, not a security expert, I had a few thoughts that I'd
>> like to throw in. Thanks to Patrick, he helped me to drill down some of
>>
MIPS ABIs
Diego Pettenò <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Working with PAM, aclocal and m4 Files
Fernando J. Pereda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Arch Specific Notes -- ALPHA
Simon Stelling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Arch Specific Notes -- AMD64/EM64T
Alin Dobre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
echo -- Print Strings
Joseph Jezak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Arch Specific Notes -- PPC
--
Peter
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
> Benno
If you have any corrections, suggestions or improvements please contact
the editors. Large portions of the handbook were originally written by
Ciaran McCreesh along with our contributors.
--
Peter
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 25 May 2006 01:43:33 +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2006 18:36:07 -0400
> Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> If you have any corrections, suggestions or improvements please contact
>> the editors. Large portions of the handbook were orig
intaining this. I do not think a non dev would be
permitted to do so.
I've made my point. Any other writings by me on this subject would be
repetitive. Flame me if you feel like it, but please don't forget to
ignore facts along the way.
--
Peter
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
occur, then, lo, the orphaned package
may have a maintainer someday.
So, hopefully, as the overlay project moves forward, it will help take
some of the heat off bugzilla and allow for the offering of more ebuilds
to userland.
JM2C
--
Peter
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> The idea isn't so bad, but the benefits definitely do not outweigh the
> negatives.
I did not read anything that implied o.g.o would bypass anything other
than a lengthy wait in bugzilla land. Other distros have their
experimental/testing branches, why can't gentoo?
--
Peter
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 18:09:04 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 16:23 -0400, Peter wrote:
>> I did not read anything that implied o.g.o would bypass anything other
>> than a lengthy wait in bugzilla land. Other distros have their
>> experimental/testin
On Fri, 09 Jun 2006 13:08:01 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 06:31:43PM -0400, Peter wrote:
>> And, for me again as a user, using a gentoo-hosted overlay is
>> preferable to a third party repository. This is a personal bias on my
>> part --
of ricers that will take
> the quick and easy approach, rather than doing things right.
>
I disagree. I think another user commented that gentoo has a reputation
for not being current. I see how this is the case. Part of it has to do
with being a source based distro. Part of it has to do with the
stabilization process. However, part of it has to do with some projects
just not getting in. I think sunrise will help that and show a concern for
the user community and a desire to embrace and include.
> No thanks...
Well, I respect your opinions, though I think it is a bit tight.
--
Peter
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
ly satisfying experience!
Lastly, what about user contributions? Will users require some kind of
sponsorship in order to have their ebuilds posted? What will the procedure
be (or did I miss it in one of the hundreds of emails)?
--
Peter
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
All of a sudden, emerge -uD --newuse world is showing dozens of ebuild
that are replaced due to removed use flags. Did someone change the default
use flags? Upgraded yesterday to portage 2.1.
--
Peter
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:57:00 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Monday 12 June 2006 12:42, Peter wrote:
>> All of a sudden, emerge -uD --newuse world is showing dozens of ebuild
>> that are replaced due to removed use flags. Did someone change the
>> default use flags?
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 09:23:42 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 06:42 -0400, Peter wrote:
>> All of a sudden, emerge -uD --newuse world is showing dozens of ebuild
>> that are replaced due to removed use flags. Did someone change the
>> default use flags?
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:08:03 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Monday 12 June 2006 12:57, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
>> On Monday 12 June 2006 12:42, Peter wrote:
>> > All of a sudden, emerge -uD --newuse world is showing dozens of ebuild
>> > that are replaced du
main
tree, and as such, should be considered
experimental. Do you acknowledge this: (Yes).
If yes, then touch a file somewhere and the user won't be nagged again.
Am I being to simplistic or naive?
--
Peter
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:54:47 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 01:29:55PM -0400, Peter wrote: [snip]
>> This kernel source will not cause Armageddon to arrive, cause smoke to
>> issue from your power supply, nor interfere with other ebuilds.
>
>
ovide the warnings, and let the user decide. Those are my points.
--
Peter
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
ing all devs and council) consider user's
thoughts and needs a little more. Don't just consider how to protect
against every possible outcome or eventuality. Make Gentoo more open.
Speaking unofficially, IMVHO, Sunrise accomplishes that.
--
Peter
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
ck, ergo, look in use.defaults to see what could
> be affecting you. I think people already know to use newuse to see use
> flag changes, but this tells them why there are changes.
>
The use.default file in default-linux is now empty. The one in base gives
you nothing to compare it against. Was there another file you meant?
--
Peter
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 19:47:42 +, Duncan wrote:
> Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 14
> Jun 2006 11:29:06 -0400:
>
>> The use.default file in default-linux is now empty. The one in base
>> gives you nothing to compare
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:29:44 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 June 2006 16:17, Peter wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:17:10 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> > | Care to elaborate? The wise, all-knowing Zen argument isn't |
>> >
>> > partic
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 10:58:44 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 15 June 2006 05:39, Peter wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:29:44 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > being able to download patchsets from the internet, touchup a few
>> > lines so they apply without
ly,
for goodness sakes, someone take control. You really need an authority
figure here who is respected and whose word is final. Otherwise, every
tom, dick, and harry with an opinion is going to chime in and say "Oh no,
you can't do that."
--
Peter
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On top of that, the actions a recruiter must
> perform for each recruitment aren't exactly 5 minute jobs:
>
months of silence in the many cases unlike yours are rude and inexcusable.
>
> Cheers
>
> Andrew
glad you were an exception.
--
Peter
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
I appreciate your POV. Yes, you can't expect too much from volunteers.
But, in a worldwide linux distribution, which is run more or less like a
business, there is a higher standard that should be adhered to. I don't
accept slackers or inefficiency in my business, and nor should gentoo.
Why are you no longer a gentoo-dev, btw?
--
Peter
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
distro.
> /me closes dev mailbox for another month
Well, there is a lot of clutter sometimes :)
--
Peter
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:55:14 -0400, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 12:29 +0000, Peter wrote:
>
>
>> We can disagree on that point. All distros are businesses. Users are
>> customers. No users, no distro.
>
> That is not strictly true. You can
was welcome. The prefix was condescending and
offensive.
You, as leaders, have to really think through what your intentions are and
how you are going to deal with people and factions with various
objectives. Telling people they are obviously inflammatory is really not a
strong way to begin
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:06:16 -0400, Mike Kelly wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:43:16 + (UTC)
> "Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> That's a laugh! Problem is that no devs seem to get approved in a
>> timely fashion. And, any potential devs woul
he leash from his wife and unplugged from his guitar, he
> has fun with his pomeranians dogs, going for walks and the like.
>
Poms in that climate? Tough little ones!
> So please welcome Jim as a new fellow slave^Hdev among us!
>
Mazel Tov, Jim! I'm sure Sergey is smiling in his r
/etc/conf.d/net.ppp0 - conflict with baselayout
> * /etc/init.d/net.ppp0 - conflict with baselayout
> * /etc/ppp/chat-default - unused by this version
> * /etc/ppp/options-pppoe - unused by this version
> * /etc/ppp/options-pptp - unused by this version
And
atches
for updates, etc very easily. The distributed aspect of it doesn't
necessary have to immediately impact core gentoo devs commiting ebuilds.
Or maybe not, I dunno. The point being I don't think we should immediately
write off
any of the distributed SCMs without pondering how they mig
ng about being unable to
run application Black).
I solved my problems by commenting RgbPath setting in xorg.conf. I would
suggest the line with RgbPath is commented in xorg.conf.example.
Regards,
Peter Cech
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 14:25 -0500, Curtis Napier wrote:
> Welcome codergeek! I'm his mentor so everyone wish him *lots* of luck,
> he's gonna need it. LOL
Jeez thanks for the wonderful encouragement, Curtis. Ha ha. :-P
--
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
GnuPG Public Key: 0xDA3634D7
ts distributed in portage tree
are legaly binding with respect to the packages? Each packgage carries
(or at least should carry) its license embeded inside. In my
understanding, licanse pointers in ebuilds are purely informative and
allow you to check the terms of the license (and decide if the license
is acceptable) before you actually perform any legaly binding action
(like running 'emerge app-foo/bar').
Regards,
Peter Cech
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
ay and I've
got work on Monday. Oh well. Another time, it must seem, Chris. =)
--
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
GnuPG Public Key: 0xDA3634D7
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-German border. I study Computational Linguistics at the
> University of Saarland (Germany). My hobbies are Psychology, japanese
> culture, martial arts (like Iaido), beer and of course Gentoo ;)
Welcome to the team, Boris! :-]
--
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
Gentoo Forums Global Moderator
Another Southern Californian, it would seem. Excellent. If you're ever
in the Anaheim/Orange County Area give me a jingle. We could go for some
Starbucks and head to Fry's or something. :P
Welcome aboard, Josh!
--
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
Gentoo Forums Global Moderator
GnuPG
Awesome! Welcome aboard, Christel! :-)
--
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
Gentoo Forums Global Moderator
GnuPG Public Key: 0xDA3634D7; Fingerprint:
0629 F604 3C14 937E F088 E5E9 B3CB 48EC DA36 34D7
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
er mailing list, Assistance forums, and bugs.g.o). It's good idea to
save searches (like save searches in bugzilla). BTW. There were already
suggestions with working implementations:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/33296
Peter.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On 23:41 Fri 28 Mar , Petteri Räty wrote:
> Joining us from the land of the pyramids, we have Ahmed "b33fc0d3" Ammar.
> Although originally from Egypt, nowadays he lives in UK and studies
> Computer Engineering there. He will be joining us to help with Gnome and
> all sorts of miscellaneous
tage/bashrc to have this infrastructure.
Search mailing list, it was discussed here at least twice, and this is
example from solar:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/bashrc
http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/portage_misc/bashrc.autopatch
There is no need to put such things into ebuild.
--
Peter.
signature.asc
Description: Эта часть сообщения подписана цифровой подписью
per really
left gentoo, but forgot to notify infra...
--
Peter.
signature.asc
Description: Эта часть сообщения подписана цифровой подписью
On Thursday 10 April 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> Also, you'll have to provide a URL to said change. i havent seen a
> patch for it in my random driftings on the interweb.
> -mike
I was just researching the issue, so had this handy:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-03/msg00417.html
--
/PA
Unless anyone has any objections, I'll magically turn 'keyring' into a
global USE flag tomorrow evening:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/gentoo/cvs/gentoo-x86/profiles $ grep ':keyring'
use.local.desc
app-crypt/seahorse:keyring - Enable gnome-keyring support for storing
passwords
app-text/evince:keyring - Ena
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 18:32 +0300, Ali Polatel wrote:
> Alon Bar-Lev yazmış:
> > I suggest gnome-something as it is gnome feature.
>
> How about gnome-keyring? :)
>
Why? All the ebuilds currently using the 'keyring' use flag are using it
for gnome-keyring. As long as there is a proper descriptio
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 18:06 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
> > 2008/4/20 Peter Weller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 18:32 +0300, Ali Polatel wrote:
> >> > Alon Bar-Lev yazm??:
> >> > > I suggest gno
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 19:36 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> Le dimanche 20 avril 2008 à 20:25 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev a écrit :
> > On 4/20/08, Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > for what it's worth, as a gnome dev I didn't see any convincing
> > > arguments as to why it shou
sys-libs/openipmi
sys-apps/edac-utils
and most of them are maintained by robbat2. So Robin, please,
comment! :)
--
Peter.
signature.asc
Description: Эта часть сообщения подписана цифровой подписью
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 19:11 +0100, Peter Weller wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 19:36 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> > Le dimanche 20 avril 2008 à 20:25 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev a écrit :
> > > On 4/20/08, Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
ld w/ newer gcc.
>
> What do you think about this ?
How do you suppose to change gcc version portage uses on-the-fly?
Please, answer trough bugzilla where most bug reports/feature requests
should normally go.
--
Peter.
signature.asc
Description: Эта часть сообщения подписана цифровой подписью
Take it
here:
http://overlays.gentoo.org/dev/pva/browser/dev-libs/lockdev/
I needed it as I wanted to try schroot but after some attempts (without
much luck) and I've went with writing my own script to manage chroots.
Regards,
--
Peter.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
ries for thing like this, please? If only
part of developers will update ChangeLogs they became useless...
--
Peter.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
ofiles/ChangeLog.
Thank you.
--
Peter.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
here any reason why --as-needed is not enabled "by default"?
--
Peter.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
e asked about problems with having --as-needed by
default, I'd better go with academic. C++ is quite common language to
ignore its design problems and in the end it's not hard to define
LDFLAGS in make.conf.
--
Peter.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 19:26 +0100, Alex Howells wrote:
> 2008/6/5 Ali Polatel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I want to nominate:
> >
> > Fernando J. Pereda -- "ferdy"
> > Bo Ørsted Andresen -- "zlin"
> >
>
> Is there a method for objecting to a nomination, kinda like the
> opposite of seconding it?
Count me in. I don't really know whether or not to write a manifesto as
such... I mean, it's obviously good to know what the person who you're
voting for wants to do, but... All the nominees are just going to write
about the latest and greatest issues (see my old manifesto). But I'm
generally about
On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 13:41 +0100, Alex Howells wrote:
[snip]
> I often don't agree with him, but can't help but respect the work he does.
>
> I would like to see Council move towards a more compressed meeting
> format -- people presenting arguments need to work out their stuff
> before bringing i
ortage/profiles/features/ChangeLog
/usr/portage/profiles/ChangeLog
Thus whenever you change anything in arch profile, or in base or
features subdirectory use relevant ChangeLog. For other changes like
local USE flags, masking/unmasking/updating masks (not comments :))
use /usr/portage/profiles/ChangeLo
[..snip..]
This doesn't, to me, really seem to be relevant to the original purpose
of the thread. Can we either start a new thread or get this one back on
topic?
welp
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
es/ChangeLog.
Thank you,
--
Peter.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
one year before using it instead
of crapping the tree for years with such eapi-extesions...
--
Peter.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
В Срд, 11/06/2008 в 08:34 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh пишет:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:25:50 +0400
> Peter Volkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you need eapi in file name what are the technical reasons of
> > putting it into file name extension? Why don't you sugges
On Saturday 31 May 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 31 May 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > ive made this shift in profiles.desc:
> > sed -ir '/^(arm|s390|sh)/s:stable:dev:' profiles.desc
> > if/when we get dedicated arch maintainers, they can think about
> > shifting back
>
> for the confu
e idea of adding options (switches) to said functions.
But speaking about names of options - -A and -B are easier to remember
as -A stands for above and -B for below and grep users already knew
that.
BTW, have anybody filled feature request?
--
Peter.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
iscussed as pkg_maint() or maint_...(); bug 185567).
--
Peter.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
And still, one day I learn this options for grep, it'll became
trivial to learn them for einfo functions. :)
--
Peter.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
ugs and tell us that PMS is ready we should
not spend our time discussing PMS and trying to approve it.
--
Peter.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
gt; but know the show stopper the webiterface supports plugins
> so how can i say that this webapp is a plugin for another webapp
It's possible to use USE-flags for webapp to handle it's plugins.
--
Peter.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
В Вск, 15/06/2008 в 15:50 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh пишет:
> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:42:28 +0400
> Peter Volkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > By formalizing I mean the following: call for and form PMS team. Team
> > must represent portage developers and could paludis and pkgc
7;s good to have such change.
--
Peter.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
e GLEP 1 instead for writing new one...
--
Peter.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
masking/updating masks (not
comments :)) use /usr/portage/profiles/ChangeLog.
Thank you,
--
Peter.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 11:38 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 10:56:51AM +0200, Albert Zeyer wrote:
> > > Thus whenever you change anything in arch profile, or in base or
> > > features subdirectory use relevant ChangeLog. For other changes like
> > > local USE flags document
rt commit in case ChangeLog is not filled. Taking into account a
number (about 1 commit per day(!)) of developers who forgive to use
echangelog I think this is the only way to go if we want that
ChangeLog's to be useful...
--
Peter.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
run testsuite to be sure it was built
correctly in your environment...
--
Peter.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 15:49 +0200, Alin Nstac wrote:
> Peter Volkov wrote:
> > В Сбт, 21/06/2008 в 10:56 +0200, Albert Zeyer пишет:
> >
> >> Perhaps install a script which automatically takes the CVS comment when
> >> some of these files is changed and a
ould be tested
independently on each arch and there is no sane way to test all ebuilds
that inherit eclass... Or do we have exceptions? If so, then ebuilds for
dictionaries and stardict.eclass could be perfect exception, but QA team
prohibited usage of KEYWORDS in stadict eclass. See bug 16383
On Monday 30 June 2008, Michael Hammer wrote:
> * Jeremy Olexa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080630 19:53]:
> > [...] IMO, b-w'ing is something that anyone can do.
>
> s/can/should ? I mean bug wrangling is a very important thing
> especially in the sight of users. I'm really willing to help on
> b-w'ing if
. Think about
not-autotools packages, and don't put it in the tree until we start
using USE deps.
Thanks for reiterating this discussion. I wanted to return to it soon as
seems that USE deps are really about to enter our life.
And BTW, seems that all gnome packages obey EXTRA_ECONF ;)
--
P
ible changes in PM, we
just need to wait enough time to start using it. But taking into account
that the features that will make use of this GLEP55 are still not so
evident I don't see any problem to wait. In any case I'd like to
understand why should we start support this hell of extensions.
--
Peter.
1 - 100 of 1121 matches
Mail list logo
