On Saturday 05 November 2005 06:08, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> Why does `emerge --changelog` not suffice for package-specific news?
>From a user/sys.admin point of view let me give you an example;
I maintain quite a lot Gentoo-systems. For me it's impossible to read _every_
changelog for minor releas
On Friday 23 December 2005 16:44, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> Hi all
>
> It is with deep regret that I want to inform you about my decision to step
> down from the position of Gentoo Documentation lead.
I just want to say thank you very much for the outstanding work you (and the
rest of the GDP-team)
On Tuesday 26 December 2006 02:04, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
> from the tree, for the week ending 2006-12-24 23h59 UTC.
>
> Removals:
> x11-misc/emerald-themes 2006-12-20 01:00:59 tsunam
>
> Additions:
On Saturday 21 July 2007 16:36:03 Roy Marples wrote:
> This is just a heads up for getting baselayout-2 stable. Next week I
> plan to put baselayout-2.0.0_rc1 into the tree without any keywords and
> it will be removed from package.mask (keeping the current alphas masked
> though). Arch teams w
On Wednesday 04 May 2005 11:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i just returned from a meeting with IBM which was about getting
> support for Gentoo Linux (hardware and software). The people from IBM
> told me that it's possible for Gentoo to become officially supported
> on IBM server hardwa
On Thursday 05 May 2005 01:14, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> For us to support LSB:
>
> * We'd have to use RPM instead of portage
That's not correct, quote from LSB:
"The distribution itself may use a different packaging format for its own
packages, and of course it may use any available mechanism for
On Thursday 07 July 2005 00:46, Greg KH wrote:
> Ok, now that devfs is removed from the 2.6 kernel tree[1], I think it's
> time to start to revisit some of the /dev naming rules that we currently
> are living with[2].
>
> To start with, the 061 version of udev offers a big memory savings if
> you u
On Saturday 09 July 2005 00:25, Greg KH wrote:
> > I.o.w. is it still necessary to have RC_DEVICE_TARBALL="yes" as a
> > default or can we move to a pure udev system and change the default to
> > "no".
>
> I've been running my boxes successfully with "no" since the option
> showed up just fine :)
On Saturday 09 July 2005 01:35, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> I think people is under a misconception about this option and ... you
> really only need to enable this for a driver that is not sysfs aware
> (nvidia comes to mind - any others?)
nvidia is also sysfs-aware and /dev-entries are created with
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 06:38, Chris White wrote:
> Here's the initial devspace draft of the new MySQL draft I've been working
> on:
>
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/mysql.html
>
> Comments, etc are welcome.
This is a very good guide! Thanks a lot!!
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Monday 15 August 2005 05:25, Corey Shields wrote:
> Archive links for the complete morning and afternoon sessions are at
> http://devconference.gentoo.org
> -Corey
Hi Corey (and IU),
Thanks a lot! Is it possible to download the media-files instead of streaming?
This makes it a lot easier to
On Thursday 18 August 2005 05:29, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> maillog: 18/08/2005-03:03:40(+0200): Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò types
> > media-video/mplayer:dts - Enables libdts (5.1 surround sound audio)
support
> > I'll commit this tomorrow, when I'll be sure it's ok after an awake
> > check. If no
On Friday 21 October 2005 04:56, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 20 October 2005 10:49 pm, Dan Meltzer wrote:
> > Why single out this one? ones system will not break irreperbly
> > without a cxx compiler, it'll just cause a another recompile to get it
> > to work after breakage if the person i
On Sunday 30 October 2005 10:06, Wernfried Haas wrote:
> 4) Forums. We have the News and Announcements box on the forums and we
>will set sticky threads upon request. In fact we even stick threads
>and posts announcements if we encounter something worth mentioning
>in our opinion. Since
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 02:29, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:16:35PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > | How will it handle GLSAs then? [1]
> >
> > gentoolkit != portage.
>
> Correct. Course, also incorrect.
A plan for handling GLSA's from portage (emerge --security) wa
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
>
> Il giorno ven, 11/02/2011 alle 13.06 +0100, Sebastian Pipping ha
> scritto:
> >
> > If anyone considers masking glibc 2.13 for now: please take my vote.
>
> It should have been masked _beforehand_, masking it now is going to
> cause mo
16 matches
Mail list logo
