On Thursday 07 July 2005 00:46, Greg KH wrote: > Ok, now that devfs is removed from the 2.6 kernel tree[1], I think it's > time to start to revisit some of the /dev naming rules that we currently > are living with[2]. > > To start with, the 061 version of udev offers a big memory savings if > you use the "default" kernel name of a device[3]. If you do that, it does > not create a file in its database in /dev/.udevdb/
Are there any ebuilds in the tree that are not sysfs/udev-aware? I.o.w. is it still necessary to have RC_DEVICE_TARBALL="yes" as a default or can we move to a pure udev system and change the default to "no". -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
