Actually "staff" gives the ideal ambiguity that is needed for these
placements. The need to seperate developers from staff who have
seperate jobs to do is an acute one.
At the moment the @gentoo.org address is seen as a developer one but as
you mentioned the word "staff" is already used to descri
The only reason any of this is coming up is because some wanted to keep
the .g.org addresses to the developer staff. If the CVS access is read
only and they are working for gentoo what difference would it make?
This would sort out the AT and forums question in one swoop.
George
On 11/19/05, Grant
Having organised several Gentoo UK meetings I would like to be advised
if anyone has a problem; especially if they dont come or have no idea
when, where or what they are.
George ProwseOn 11/18/05, Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Chris,Sorry for the delay in replying. Having a few rel
As these would be @gentoo.org people they would be easier for devrel to
tackle. Making them closer under the gentoo wing just makes them easier
to dicipline.On 11/19/05, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 13:34:10 -0800 Corey Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:| Why not di
idea but it would eventually mean that
the ATs would get the job of testing the packages that the users say
are ok so that the devs can concentrate on bugsOn 11/19/05, Corey Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 18 November 2005 07:01 pm, George Prowse wrote:>
As these would be @g
5, Corey Shields <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Friday 18 November 2005 07:40 pm, George Prowse wrote:
> Yeah, I think a sub-domain may not be a good solution but unfortunately it> is the best at present. The site is a good idea but nothing stops it fromI disagree that it is the best idea..
On 19/11/05, Sven Vermeulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've said it in the first meeting and I'll reiterate: what is the sentiment
> of the arch testers in this case (if they are still reading this thread)?
>
Anything that makes us do our job better and makes our lives easier is
a good thing. Tha
On 19/11/05, George Prowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19/11/05, Sven Vermeulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've said it in the first meeting and I'll reiterate: what is the sentiment
> > of the arch testers in this case (if they are still reading this
No stage 1 or 2? Excellent. People seem to wear Stage 1 like a badge
of honour but never seem to realise that the earlier you play around
with your system the deeper the mistakes.
Why are the instructions for the stage 1 and 2 in the handbook at all?
They should be in Gentoo dev space and the only
Is it possible to have the font from the original Aaron Shi design?
George
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On 23/11/05, Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Ostrow wrote:
>
> > Lance:
> >
> > I know this is a far cry from what you are proposing, and I understand
> > that the present CVS server cannot handle this sort of load but I
> > believe that this was the original intention at least.
On 24/11/05, lnxg33k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:49:18 +0100 Filip Bartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > | I want have Gentoo in e-shop with Linux distributions. I find, that
> > | Gentoo is under GNU/GPL. Must I distribute in e-shop sources
Is vendors.gentoo.org going to have the new redesign that curtis119 is
implementating? It seems that it is on a different server and vhost and
is maintained by someone other than Ian! now.
Does it have a future under the Gentoo umbrella?
George
After some talk in the forums a point came up that we need a way to reduce the long used gentoo system to a bare point before X but after any baselayout upgrade had been applied. This script would enable two things: a person to rebuild his system after a library malfunction and also if a person wan
On 12/12/05, Andrew Muraco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
George Prowse wrote:> After some talk in the forums a point came up that we need a way to> reduce the long used gentoo system to a bare point before X but after> any baselayout upgrade had been applied.
Isn't that what the
reinstalling as you would basically have an upgraded stage 3
after some unmergingOn 12/12/05, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
George Prowse wrote:> yes but if you extracted a stage on to an already built system you would> not only have the the mess there that you wanted to get rid of b
Pick an area to help in and help with it (file bug reports, submit patches, comment on mailing lists). If people notice you are working well towards a specific area you are far more likely to be mentored. Ask this question to a developer in a few months time, one who you have a rapport with.
George
No, BPMx and Audacious are two different thingshttp://audacious-media-player.org/FAQ#1.4On 22/02/06,
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 19:34, Stephen P. Becker wrote:> Ugh, it looks like this new 'BMPx' branch uses gstreamer. Is there no> way to kee
Oh no! Not kernelsensei!!!On 23/02/06, Boris Fersing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2006/2/23, Peter Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:> On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 22:48 +0100, Wernfried Haas wrote:> > Boris is one of the people taking care of the French forum and now has
> > joined the official Gentoo ranks.> >>
Would we be required to fix the mess left by the previous sys-admin? :pGeorgeOn 28/02/06, Rob Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:Hi peeps,LINX (http://www.linx.net
) are looking for a sys-admin with excellentGentoo knowledge. Hardened toolchain and/or grsec experience areconsidered a big plus.You w
Peter, the least you could do is take your boyfriend somewhere nice... ;)On 09/03/06, Peter Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:Another Southern Californian, it would seem. Excellent. If you're ever
in the Anaheim/Orange County Area give me a jingle. We could go for someStarbucks and head to Fry's or
I cant pick up my -dev emails because of this outageGeorgeOn 13/03/06, Lars Weiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Wernfried Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06/03/13 15:46 +0100]:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 08:34:59AM -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:> > [..] the database server is not working (bugs/forums/etc).
On 20/03/06, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:07:37 + Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:| One of the bigger problems is that we have a huge user community who| are keen on contributing, but we have such a high barrier for entry
| to the developer community.
I have always respected Gentoo for it's ability to be completely helpful for people no matter what their circumstances but i fear we are pushing a secion of society away. We offer forums, mailing lists and the distribution itself in a variety of languages, we have attempted to port portage to vario
On 08/05/06, Curtis Napier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been around since the beginning and have fond memories of Larryjust like the rest of you. I wasn't planning on getting rid of him.
In fact, I was planning on using him a little more for other things. Ialready used him for a custom error pag
Why risk anything by changing the tree to suit the package? It just
seems like asking for trouble. The overlay ability is there for a
reason. Paludis isn't being used and should be kept out of the sphere
of users use until it is usable, wont break systems and is trustworthy enough to be near the tr
On 17/05/06, Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2006 15:25:08 +0100"George Prowse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Why risk anything by changing the tree to suit the package?We're not risking anything, except upsetting a few people. We're
On 17/05/06, Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2006 15:57:51 +0100"George Prowse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> So good working practice is to introduce a variable where breakages
> could come from two directions rather than stick with what wo
On 17/05/06, Rob Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey all,As I've done very little Gentoo work in last few months and havegenerally lost interest in Gentoo, I'll be retiring.If you need to reach me you can find me at
[EMAIL PROTECTED], or onIRC where I'll continue to sit in #gentoo-audit.Credit
On 18/05/06, Christel Dahlskjaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 00:23 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:> On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 17:38 -0400, Mark Loeser wrote:> > As the latest long thread has shown, there seems to be a split (it is hard to> > tell exactly) on whether or not altern
On 18/05/06, Chris White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1On Thu, 18 May 2006 17:08:17 -0400Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> On Thu, 18 May 2006 22:01:42 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> > Then learn how to use your mail client.> >> > And hey, look, by startin
On 15/06/06, Kevin F. Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 00:31:41 -0400Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> So apparently they suck, anyone have a new shiny idea on how to group> packages and maintaining developers?
We could be boring and change "herd" to "packagegroup".--Kevin
On 15/06/06, Curtis Napier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Shyam Mani wrote:> Hi everyone,>> Please take a moment to welcome our latest addition to the Forums gang,> Roy Bamford aka NeddySeagoon.Thanks for volunteering your time Roy, we will all benefit from your
extensive knowledge and your patience wi
On 19/06/06, Tobias Klausmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Caleb Tennis wrote:
> I'd like to propose some form of ability to post user comments
> to GWN stories. I suppose a full blown CMS system would work,
> but for the ease of time I'm suggesting that perhaps we open u
Personally I dont think it would be worth having the whole GWN on the
forums, if people dont read it in the email or online then putting it
on the forums isn't going to make them start reading it.
What the forum does allow is for people to suggest stories, give
suggestions for tips and tricks and
Josh Saddler wrote:
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
Alright. Then I'll nominate all members of the current council. In
alphabetical order:
amne
betelgeuse
dberkholz
flameeyes
jokey
lu_zero
vapier
Seconded.
Thirded
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Alex Howells wrote:
2008/6/3 George Prowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thirded
Someone can clarify but don't you need to be a Foundation member to
nominate or support nominations?
Either way, all of the current Council get my nomination, plus welp
gets a second.
Anyone can nomina
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008, George Prowse wrote:
Someone can clarify but don't you need to be a Foundation member to
nominate or support nominations?
[...]
Anyone can nominate but only members get a vote.
GLEP 39 says something else:
| * Council members will be chos
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:31 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
Alex Howells wrote:
2008/6/3 George Prowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thirded
Someone can clarify but don't you need to be a Foundation member to
nominate or support nominations?
Either way, all of
Alex Howells wrote:
In short: vote for me if you want less bullshit, less asshats and a
more fun distribution. That is all.
Damn! Astinus for PM! :)
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
I have an strange idea, it will probably get shot down by everyone or
people will point out that it has been discussed and thought it was a
bad idea but anyway...
...why not invite a developer from another distribution to join the council?
I think inviting co-operation from other areas would o
Ferris McCormick wrote:
I also nominate:
NeddySeagoon
Regards,
Ferris
I completely agree. Few people have done more behind the scenes as Roy.
I would also like to nominate zmendico for his excellent work with portage.
George
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Luca Barbato wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Package manager maintainers refusing to do basic testing before
claiming support for a new EAPI has very messy consequences. If package
manager maintainers aren't going to do the responsible thing, the whole
point of EAPIs is lost.
Thats a circular ar
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:32:35 +0100
George Prowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If the bickering is stopping development then maybe it should be
given to a 3rd party to complete and have the last word.
Considering third parties have at best contributed a few small p
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:34:56 -0400
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd honestly like to see an official PMS project page i.e.
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/pms/
There's http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/pms.xml . Unfortunately, rane
decided to go and vandalise i
Thomas Anderson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:11:51PM +0100, George Prowse wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:34:56 -0400
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd honestly like to see an official PMS project page i.e.
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/pms/
T
Although he has been nominated already and thus declined I would still
like amne to change his mind and run for council again.
George
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
++
It's about time someone said this and I honestly think that lots of
developers will be thinking the same.
In the end, PMS is just a way for them to spread their own agenda and
force it on both the developers and the users so maybe it would be best
for all if paludis and it's developers we
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:17:56 +0400
Ivan Chernyavsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Recently I've subscribed to this list because I thought this is the
right way to start being involved in Gentoo development process --- I
thought technical discussions are of most importance her
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:48:02 +
"Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:17:56 +0400
| * have some insane paranoid conviction that Freenode staff are the
| ones busy spying on everything they say, whilst con
On 11 Aug 2008, at 14:19, Patrick Lauer wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:51:11 -0700
"Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Despite our best efforts Gentoo is not a fun-loving community where
everyone gets along.
Actually, I'd say that's a fairly accurate description
Peter Faraday Weller wrote:
Hi
Thanks,
welp
Sad to hear it mate.
As the person who did your first install for you (i think) I think you
will be missed.
I am quite surprised about what you said about the state of things
because i've got the distinct impression from others that Gentoo h
Thomas Sachau wrote:
Mario Fetka schrieb:
On Monday, 4. May 2009 19:06:12 George Prowse wrote:
Peter Faraday Weller wrote:
Hi
Thanks,
welp
Sad to hear it mate.
As the person who did your first install for you (i think) I think you
will be missed.
I am quite surprised about what you
Mounir Lamouri wrote:
George Prowse wrote:
I think you are missing the point. If you sit and wait for them to
join you will always be understaffed.
Go on a big dev drive! Announce it all over all the Gentoo's normal
communication channels and other generic linux places! Email some
Markos Chandras wrote:
On Tuesday 05 May 2009 19:26:00 Thomas Anderson wrote:
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 05:06:43PM +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Tuesday 05 May 2009 16:50:47 Richard Freeman wrote:
Arch
teams seem to be generally doing a good job keeping up with STABLEREQs
on the major archs -
Thomas Sachau wrote:
George Prowse schrieb:
Thomas Sachau wrote:
For those, who can work with IRC and are interested in working with
ebuilds, there is already an option:
Join #gentoo-dev-help or even better #gentoo-sunrise and read the
documentation from the topic. The
Sunrise Overlay (with
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 04 May 2009 21:47:08 +0100
George Prowse wrote:
If you make it a big and special occasion which is planned correctly
with a sufficient number of current developers who are willing to
walk people through how and what it means to be a Gentoo Developer
then the
Arttu V. wrote:
On 5/7/09, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
There's no reason that can't be done via email, and throwing in
some live commit feed action might make it a bit interesting. =:^)
I'm sensing a sort of a "patches welcome" attitude from the crowd,
i.e., not falling for a hard sel
Thilo Bangert wrote:
to me, the above two contradictory viewpoints are the essence of the
apparent and real decline in Gentoo activity. The two are just not
compatible with each other and there is no clear guidance on to which of
the two should be followed.
in the one corner we have the 'Dani
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2009 23:17:32 +0100
George Prowse wrote:
An equilibrium seems to have been reached which currently works.
An equilibrium has been reached, agreed, but that it works is up for
debate. There is a strong argument to be made that preserving the
equilibrium
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2009 20:06:51 +0200
Patrick Lauer wrote:
"You need to know the EAPI to parse the ebuild to find the EAPI"
Obviously that's not true, because somehow we manage at the moment.
And if one does a small restriction (which doesn't restrict current
behaviour becau
Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
I think it would be in the best interest of both Exherbo and Gentoo to elect
gentoofan23, betelgeuse, dev-zero, peper, calchan and dertobi123 to the Gentoo
Council.
Why is Exherbo's interests anything to do with Gentoo's? Does this
happen with Sabayon or SystemRescueCd
Alistair Bush wrote:
As our closest relative ( of any distro )
You mean apart from all the other Gentoo based distros?
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:31:43 +0100
George Prowse wrote:
> This strengthening bridge of understanding can be seen in dev-
> zero's move to appoint ciaranm as his proxy for today's council
> meeting.
If a doctor loses his right to practice medicine
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:46:27 +0100
George Prowse wrote:
I'm sure getting personal about subjects on a Gentoo mailing list
will endear yourself to everyone.
Uh, isn't that exactly what you're doing?
Nope, I never mentioned anything personal about you,
The Reg has a story on this from a blog post by Red Hat. It may be worth a
read:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/01/18/windows_8_linux_secure_boot/
On 22/06/2012 07:40, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 23:01:15 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
Just a short note as it seems some confusion arises lately:
Ciaran McCreesh is not a Gentoo dev and his words don't represent
the position of Gentoo development team.
Right. Doesn't that make m
On 05/07/06, Curtis Napier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 01 July 2006 02:46, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> well it's about that time of the year ... time for nominating
>> people for the next Gentoo Council
>
> i guess i'll start off some mass nominations of ra
On 09/07/06, Daniel Gryniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 20:46 -0600, Steve Dibb wrote:
> @devs,
>
> If your blog is being aggregated on Planet Gentoo / Universe, it's time to
send
> us a copy of your smiling face. I'm putting out a request for some
> hackergotchis. Real
On 30/06/06, Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm proud to announce the arival of a future developer. His name is "Tom". He
arived last monday on 10:22 am (UTC+02). I and my wife will take care of
mentoring him to full developership ;-).
In the meantime, he's got his own album on
http:
On 25/07/06, Wernfried Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 05:34:31PM +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> Dunno about other folks, but I'd be very happy to see us return to the
> Resource Centre once more. I thought that it worked well as a venue,
> and that London is the right pl
On 25/07/06, Wernfried Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 10:04:17AM -0700, Joshua Jackson wrote:
> hmm, that returned nothing *hides the cash in my pocket* guess you
> didn't define the project, and your loss is my gain ;)
Ooops - well, just don't spend it all at once.
che
On 07/08/06, Christel Dahlskjaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is my pleasure to introduce to you... the artist formerly known as...
beu! Many will know Elfyn from his previous stint as a Gentoo developer.
This time around, we have a understanding.. the sort that involves
sleeping with fish and f
On 20/08/06, Mark Kowarsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please welcome our latest forums staff, Jorge Vicetto aka jmbsvicetto.
>
/me hugs Jorge. Glad to have you on board.
Mark
All we need now is to find out how to pronounce your name
George
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On 10/09/06, Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, wondering why people use Gentoo. Put [dev] or something if
> you're an actual gentoo dev and [user] if you're a user. Doesn't
> need to be fancy, you can put "community" or something if that's all
> you want. All responses off list please
On 11/09/06, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:01:02 -0400 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Stuart Herbert wrote:
| > On 9/11/06, Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| >> Uhm, web-apps has been CCed on the bug since the beginning. Last
| >> time I asked, n
Oh goodie another person who just likes to "act like a developer" but
really wants to just play games like Wolf. *wink* Welcome aboard
Tristan enjoy being a slave to the people now MUAHHAHAHAHAHAH.
Heh, i can vouch for nyhm... he spends far too much time playing on
IRC and doing nothing to be pl
Lionel Bouton wrote:
Hi, I just had an unpleasant experience with -ffast-math and GCC 4.1.1
(it borked my LDAP authentication on several systems which worked with
the same CFLAGS as long as GCC 3.4.6 was used).
There is a lot of material out there about CFLAGS and Gentoo (google
returns 387000 p
Dan Meltzer wrote:
How much would gentoo make in a ciaran vs. devrel fight?
I want to see results on my money though! I dont want to have to wait a
year like last time!
George
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Elfyn McBratney wrote:
On 23/10/06, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:55:15 +0100 "Stuart Herbert"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On 10/23/06, Caleb Cushing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > >
| > > Weapons allowed?
| >
| > melee weapons only, maybe?
|
| Guns for show
A user has stated this in a thread. Could someone respond please?
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-510146.html
"I suggest that the devs don't hard mask packages, especially ones
depended on by several other ebuilds, until notice has been given in the
GWN's pending package removal section.
Dan Meltzer wrote:
I think you gave the wrong forum link :)
On 10/23/06, George Prowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A user has stated this in a thread. Could someone respond please?
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-510146.html
"I suggest that the devs don't hard mask pack
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 01:53, Drake Wyrm wrote:
I think someone is yanking your chain, vapier.
i doubt it ... other people on irc mentioned receiving said e-mail as well
Haven't seen said email here...
George
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Seemant Kulleen wrote:
Saleem & Gnome Team,
I think it's high time this was done. My suggestion would be to
publicise this *beyond* just the gentoo-dev list. I would put this on
-user and in the forums (and one of you should probably blog before the
fact as well).
Thanks,
Agreed. Can the or
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:01:11 + "Stuart Herbert"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On 11/29/06, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > As of this release, I kept a copy of all of the distfiles for the
| > entire release, and can make a DVD of it, on request. This
|
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 00:11:29 +0200, Alexandru Mincu wrote:
I sent this earlier and it wasn't received so I resend it now...
It was received, but you didn't see it because you are using GMail, which
treated it as a duplicate of the mail you'd sent.
I have to ask, is ther
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 12:17:23 +1100 George Prowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| I have to ask, is there a way to stop this action because it is very
| annoying.
Don't use GMail?
If only other annoying things were so easy to fix...
tell me about it
--
Markus Ullmann wrote:
...
Welcome welp, hopefully I wont have to ssh install for you anymore... ;)
George
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
The Gentoo Council is looking for some ideas for some small projects
that we could initiate that would help Gentoo. These project ideas
should be things that are attainable in a measurable amount of time, and
should be fairly small in scope. This would be in the same vei
Bryan Østergaard wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 11:46:32AM +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh ha scritto:
It is widely perceived that Gentoo has a huge problem with slacker
archs cluttering up the tree and making maintainers' work harder.
Clearly, something needs to be done
Daniel Robbins wrote:
Hey all, and thanks for the welcome back. It was a bit strange to find
old stuff from 2005 in my dev.gentoo.org homedir. Sort of like a time
capsule :)
-Daniel
Get it in the tree quickly!!!
Anyway, good to see you back mate.
George
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
Hiya all,
As some of you are already aware, I was at the last Council meeting
given a Task. This Task was to draft a proposed Code of Conduct for
Gentoo, and a scheme for enforcing it. The current version of this
proposal can be found at http://dev.gentoo.org/~christe
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 16:00 +0100, Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen wrote:
Uhh, no. This gets enforced on devs and users alike.
I wouldn't bring it up in the first place, but we've had previous examples
with devs calling other devs not so kind things and to my knowle
Ferris McCormick wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:30:32 -0500
Steev Klimaszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Personally I understand why flameeyes took that to bugzilla; how else
could he say he'd gone thru the appropri
Luca Barbato wrote:
Alexandre Buisse wrote:
I'm sorry to have been so long (and I have a lot more to say!) but this
is more or less why I think both the idea and its proposed
implementation are bad and will ultimately hurt us.
I do agree and I add that this current thread so far is a g
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
That's just it. Portage needs to deliver major visible improvements at
the user level for Gentoo to get anywhere. Managing a Gentoo system is
much harder now than it was a few years ago, but the tools are largely
the same.
What on earth is going to be a "major visible im
Stephen Bennett wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:35:14 +
George Prowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So you'd rather let one of the best employees go rather than chastise
a worker who is leaving soon? Thats just cutting off your nose to
spite your face.
I'd rather ma
Caleb Cushing wrote:
What on earth is going to be a "major visible improvement" to a
command
line based package manager that any average Gentoo user is going to
realise? The average user probably only uses a few commands: emerge
-u/p/a/v/--sync/package/world/system and then u
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:30:11 + George Prowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I'd rather make it known that that sort of backhanded tactics to
get rid of someone you don't like won't work whoever uses them.
You would certainly make tha
Caleb Cushing wrote:
I have no idea if it's possible but if a topic is deemed to be off
topic
then can any further replies with that subject be forwarded
automatically to another address like gentoo-dev-offtopic so they dont
go to gentoo-dev?
I believe you can change the de
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
