Re: [gentoo-dev] Help offered - Portage tree

2008-03-13 Thread Fabio Erculiani
Hi Robin, first of all. What I need is _basic_ respect on #gentoo-dev You here seem all polite, but there you like playing me. This is not a good start. On 3/13/08, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:24:23AM +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote: > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Help offered - Portage tree

2008-03-13 Thread Fabio Erculiani
k publicly here, without hiding in a development channel, we probably get more visibility, don't we? I will review your stuff on lzo probably tomorrow, hope won't be a problem. On 3/13/08, Fabio Erculiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Robin, > first of all. > What

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Help offered - Portage tree

2008-03-13 Thread Fabio Erculiani
can fix it? > no, i'm too busy and you guys are slow. give me cvs access. > uh no? > you're stupid. > > > > -- > fonts, gcc-porting, by design, by neglect > mips, treecleaner,for a fact or just f

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Help offered - Portage tree

2008-03-13 Thread Fabio Erculiani
of me. I really admire the commitment of some of you and it's the only thing that led me coming here to talk. BTW, It's funny to see the difference of attitudes from here and IRC, let me underline that :) So this is a neutral ground. -- Fabio Erculiani Information and Communication Tec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Help offered - Portage tree

2008-03-13 Thread Fabio Erculiani
cation of the perceived > problems? > > > -- > Chris Gianelloni > Release Engineering Strategic Lead > Games Developer > > Yeah, but IIRC you are a SOURCE distro builder. Arent't you? (I am just asking!) -- Fabio Erculiani Information and Communication Technologies C

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Help offered - Portage tree

2008-03-13 Thread Fabio Erculiani
to people. > > > -- > > Chris Gianelloni > Release Engineering Strategic Lead > Games Developer Oh so the stupid is me. True true... -- Fabio Erculiani Information and Communication Technologies Consultant Sabayon Linux Chief Architect http://www.sabayonlinux.org -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Help offered - Portage tree

2008-03-13 Thread Fabio Erculiani
s and maintaining in an overlay it's not that hard. On 3/13/08, joshua jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Fabio Erculiani wrote: > | Hi all, > | > | Cheers > > interestingly enough ixnay...I've tri

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Help offered - Portage tree

2008-03-13 Thread Fabio Erculiani
at least have been a little more subtle and a > little less self congratuling, maybe it would have worked, who knows :) > > - -- > Pierre-Yves Rofes > Gentoo Linux Security Team I hope you were joking :))) -- Fabio Erculiani Information and Communication Technologies Consultan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Help offered - Portage tree

2008-03-13 Thread Fabio Erculiani
aware of :) zmedico has been really helpful :) On 3/14/08, joshua jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Fabio Erculiani wrote: > > | Hi Joshua, > | I never had issues with my emails. So I don't really know what to &

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Help offered - Portage tree

2008-03-14 Thread Fabio Erculiani
t one evidence here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125728 :) I've also found a lot of files collisions, especially on scientific applications. I'll try to file a huge bug for that too, but it'll take a lot of time. -- Fabio Erculiani Information and Communication Tec

Re: [gentoo-dev] The KDE overlay moves forward

2008-03-18 Thread Fabio Erculiani
ependency" syntax? > > -- > Best regards, Wulf > (Gentoo KDE Project lead) > > Thanks in advance -- Fabio Erculiani Information and Communication Technologies Consultant Sabayon Linux Chief Architect http://www.sabayonlinux.org -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] The KDE overlay moves forward

2008-03-18 Thread Fabio Erculiani
axes that restriction to any slot. > Using := dependencies changes that restriction to one specific slot. Ok thanks, is there any specific GLEP already? Or is it just a Paludis proposal? I am just wondering when this stuff will hit the tree. Thanks for the explanation > > -- > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Goodbye

2008-05-13 Thread Fabio Erculiani
I fully agree with what you wrote. Hope to see you here back again, btw net-misc/openvpn made my day a lot of times :) -- Fabio Erculiani http://www.sabayon.org Si vis pacem, para iustitiam

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: compiz

2012-04-13 Thread Fabio Erculiani
epXUunE6B/NDoXfViU86tcNn4A7dcHgV5Qzjn7v5/6wYSwdb6pc9heydGxErC > oiB1treO6n1UqWSbeQppDY4mI8wQY2cSgostClhkQw0F9a6A9lT3PfygI/20aYV7 > uz+/8J53rPiap9t7mOty > =PbRw > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > -- Fabio Erculiani http://lxnay.com

[gentoo-dev] unsafe use of gtk-query-immodules

2012-04-25 Thread Fabio Erculiani
im app-i18n/x-unikey x11-libs/gtk+ and should be fixed. -- Fabio Erculiani http://lxnay.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] unsafe use of gtk-query-immodules

2012-04-25 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > isn't this what bugzilla is for ?  reporting bugs ? > -mike Tracker Bug 413529 already filed. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012]

2012-05-09 Thread Fabio Erculiani
een enough, thanks. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012]

2012-05-09 Thread Fabio Erculiani
users I've been talking with. I am not against changes, I am actually in favor of them, but only when they really make sense and solve problems, which it doesn't seem the case lately. I didn't want to offend anyone, but just having fun (sigh) of IMHO bad design decisions. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012]

2012-05-10 Thread Fabio Erculiani
zLXDLd6LFiEYKHjyiznGDs1BAEk0oJMbob5I3 > HbAYiBP8P7D7FBosO7oj > =INQn > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Enable FEATURES=config-protect-if-modified by default?

2012-05-16 Thread Fabio Erculiani
I implemented this feature in Entropy long time ago (2009 iirc) and enabled it by default as well. We never had a single issue. Users seem quite happy about it. So yeah, go for it! -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Enable FEATURES=config-protect-if-modified by default?

2012-05-16 Thread Fabio Erculiani
, please have a news item so > that one can turn it off if necessary.  Even then, new installs will > have to remember to turn it off. > > -- > Eray Aslan > -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes?

2012-05-20 Thread Fabio Erculiani
I second that. simplicity = win. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog

2012-05-22 Thread Fabio Erculiani
urUReBipvCeGPYfE > ZIGHcSs8Wt7HH0dy/YcA/iB2TRcd3BlcVy4O6v5wmf52s4UtCNnpYOL+RpD3O/in > =uZ6k > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver

2012-05-23 Thread Fabio Erculiani
Please kill CVS with fire! I've been waiting for this since 2009. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver

2012-05-23 Thread Fabio Erculiani
t | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME) > -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git braindump: 2 of N: developer interaction (merge co-ordinators)

2012-06-03 Thread Fabio Erculiani
protocols out there, the problem is if these protocols can be applied to the git workflow. Just brain-dumping... -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild laziness and binpkg overhead

2012-06-16 Thread Fabio Erculiani
Anything build-time related should not be placed into pkg_setup (I am pointing the finger to those build-related die() that are breaking binpkgs support). There's src_prepare() and src_configure() nowadays. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] HDEPEND (host dependencies for cross-compilation) for EAPI 5?

2012-08-31 Thread Fabio Erculiani
from the HDEPEND discussion, but I think that if we're going to split *DEPEND, it might be a good opportunity to do it right _once_ and _for all_. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] HDEPEND (host dependencies for cross-compilation) for EAPI 5?

2012-08-31 Thread Fabio Erculiani
using a spoon to eat spaghetti to me. I think SDEPEND is a much simpler approach to the issue, why introducing a new kind of USE flags to address what really belongs to *DEPEND? > -- > Thanks, > Zac > -- Fabio Erculiani

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI 5+: split PDEPEND introducing SDEPEND

2012-09-02 Thread Fabio Erculiani
ks in practice and this is not really good to me, for a simple feature like this. [2] From GLEP 62 page: "and it is not strictly required that a package manager must ensure that the dependency graph is still consistent afterwards". -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI 5+: split PDEPEND introducing SDEPEND

2012-09-02 Thread Fabio Erculiani
luetooth in net-misc/networkmanager for example (this is what I mean with USE flags abuse, actually). I'm not saying that SDEPEND is the best one-size-fits-all solution but you may agree that's the simplest and most effective one. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI 5+: split PDEPEND introducing SDEPEND

2012-09-02 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 17:09:22 +0200 > Fabio Erculiani wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 4:57 PM, hasufell wrote: >> > >> > >> > Why not introduce a global useflag such as "suggested-deps" wh

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI 5+: split PDEPEND introducing SDEPEND

2012-09-02 Thread Fabio Erculiani
erstand the complexity of proposals: if it takes me more than 5 minutes to understand it, then users (!= devs) will have to go through the same or more "wtf-period". And the probability of them "giving up / getting sick / ignoring it" is linear with the wtf-period. > > -- > Ciaran McCreesh -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI 5+: split PDEPEND introducing SDEPEND

2012-09-02 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 20:46:19 +0200 > Fabio Erculiani wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Ciaran McCreesh >> wrote: >> > and we have worked out all the difficulties. >> >> Please elaborate. Wh

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI 5+: split PDEPEND introducing SDEPEND

2012-09-02 Thread Fabio Erculiani
s/with/on/ -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] HDEPEND (host dependencies for cross-compilation) for EAPI 5?

2012-09-05 Thread Fabio Erculiani
bZ2pkdEhKetlpDe+xbWY0LhaczKdizwF7BrT > d+BeazPGWBP/muY0s3VDu3KV/3TRS0tME8GRsDevA9nCfA2plU0ZmmZnTB69tLc+ > /dgdexHhc3IuA5eMObwOfSK6r9Jozlrv09TDvb6kHXm+0kqhV/W/aaS1qT4Bjlxd > psMjf9lSJHLcXuhtOz9OW4qmhp4BGCA8Rgeoq25Yw8E2eH0abvDbHR5U7u1hEpnQ > j6rJ0fZ27tfbMecd5i8b > =Zv/I > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] HDEPEND (host dependencies for cross-compilation) for EAPI 5?

2012-09-05 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: >> The complexity would become: >> O((b + r + p) * P) >> b = amount of buildtime dependencies >> r = amount of runtime dependencies >> p = amount of p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012]

2012-11-18 Thread Fabio Erculiani
It depends on who is actually laughing I'd say. just my 0.01c. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012)

2012-11-19 Thread Fabio Erculiani
In my humble opinion, the real question is: why systemd got merged into udev? I would love to hear a clear technical reason for that. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default

2013-01-23 Thread Fabio Erculiani
"smarter" than the user. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default

2013-01-23 Thread Fabio Erculiani
I think that the problem is that it is trying to be smart when it's not really possible (unless you want to cover all the corner cases, which is a pain). -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default

2013-01-24 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:32:40PM +0000, Fabio Erculiani wrote: >> I hope this is going to be binary package manager friendly. >> In Sabayon for instance, kernel sources are not even installed and at >> the same time

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default

2013-01-26 Thread Fabio Erculiani
I am starting to think that the real problem is that Gentoo does not have ebuilds for building kernels (binary kernels). At that point, it would be easy to add USE flags and virtual packages to solve the config check problem at the dependencies level once and for all. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default

2013-01-26 Thread Fabio Erculiani
What I always wondered is why we have ebuilds for every kind of binary except for kernels, yet we build official kernels with official configs for our livecds. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] splashutils needs a maintainer

2013-01-28 Thread Fabio Erculiani
entoo" one, then, it probably has some incompatibility > Gentoo :/) > Officially, we have always used fbsplash + splashutils. I have no experience with dracut/plymouth though. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] readme.gentoo.eclass: Add a readme.gentoo_force_print_elog function to force elog printing

2013-02-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
r2_0.tbz2/portage/x11-misc/bumblebee-3.0.1-r2' * S: '/var/tmp/entropy/packages/amd64/5/x11-misc_bumblebee-3.0.1-r2_0.tbz2/portage/x11-misc/bumblebee-3.0.1-r2/work/bumblebee-3.0.1' -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] readme.gentoo.eclass: Add a readme.gentoo_force_print_elog function to force elog printing

2013-02-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
No FILESDIR nor T in pkg_* phases please! -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: RFC: install linux-firmware with kernel sources (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: Firmware cleanup, part #1)

2013-02-10 Thread Fabio Erculiani
would fix any of the listed issues without causing other "side effects". For starters, if kernel sources provide /lib/firmware, how do you deal with file collisions? > > Cheers, > > Dirkjan > -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: RFC: install linux-firmware with kernel sources (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: Firmware cleanup, part #1)

2013-02-12 Thread Fabio Erculiani
I am starting to believe that this is yet another good reason for having official ebuilds building binaries off gentoo-sources through genkernel. Pretty much the same I do in Sabayon since 2007. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: RFC: install linux-firmware with kernel sources (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: Firmware cleanup, part #1)

2013-02-12 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El mar, 12-02-2013 a las 19:43 +0000, Fabio Erculiani escribió: >> I am starting to believe that this is yet another good reason for >> having official ebuilds building binaries off gentoo-sources through >> genkernel. P

Re: [gentoo-dev] [fyi] lddtree magic

2013-04-10 Thread Fabio Erculiani
It looks like you're not using a standard style guide for Python but rather this one [1]. I suggest you to use something closer to PEP8. [1] https://code.google.com/p/google-styleguide/ -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] [fyi] lddtree magic

2013-04-10 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday 10 April 2013 06:04:00 Fabio Erculiani wrote: >> It looks like you're not using a standard style guide for Python but >> rather this one [1]. >> I suggest you to use something closer to PEP8. > &

Re: [gentoo-dev] [fyi] lddtree magic

2013-04-10 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday 10 April 2013 12:42:14 Fabio Erculiani wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> > On Wednesday 10 April 2013 06:04:00 Fabio Erculiani wrote: >> >> It looks like you'

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHES] kernel-2.eclass: Various changes requested by users. + [STABLEREQ?] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.8.7: Any objections against stabilizing?

2013-04-13 Thread Fabio Erculiani
r > > E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org > GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D > GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D -- Fabio Erculiani

[gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
on-1304 [2] https://github.com/Sabayon/systemd-love [3] For instance: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465236 [4] "useless crap": https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399615 Cheers, -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El mié, 01-05-2013 a las 12:04 +0200, Fabio Erculiani escribió: > [...] >> - other ~490 systemd units are missing at this time and writing them >> could also be a great GSoC project (don't look at me, I'm busy &

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Steven J. Long wrote: > On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 12:04:00PM +0200, Fabio Erculiani wrote: >> PLEASE DO NOT START A FLAME WAR AND READ ON FIRST. >> THIS IS NOT A POST AGAINST OPENRC. >> >> With the release of Sabayon 13.04 [1] and thanks t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
There is no tracker yet. But it may be very well materialize at some point. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:52 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > On 5/1/13 3:04 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: > > As far as I read the bug, Mike (vapier) is doing the right thing. > Distros doing lots of custom changes can only add more chaos to the picture. We are a distribution,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
> But noted, those last 2 "against" reasons are "edge cases", where the > arguments for it are "majority cases", so collectively I'm still in favour > of the eselect + symlinks approach. > > > -- > Kent -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users

2013-05-02 Thread Fabio Erculiani
system default wxWidgets profile. xvmc Manage the XvMC implementation used by your system Why aren't we telling people to just edit config files!? -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users

2013-05-04 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 05/01/2013 12:04 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: >> PLEASE DO NOT START A FLAME WAR AND READ ON FIRST. >> THIS IS NOT A POST AGAINST OPENRC. > > Amen > >> With the release of Sabayon 13.04 [1] and thanks to the eff

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users

2013-05-04 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: > > Scenario: > - you have an initramfs with mdev, your pivot_chroot system runs udev. > - you have a LVM volume group, containing the lvm volume for / and > /home, and perhaps you also have swap on another volume. > -

[gentoo-dev] Re: Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users

2013-05-07 Thread Fabio Erculiani
Tracker bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468898 -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users

2013-05-08 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: > On 1 May 2013 18:04, Fabio Erculiani wrote: >> It looks like there is some consensus on the effort of making systemd >> more accessible, while there are problems with submitting bugs about >> new systemd units of the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users

2013-05-08 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Ben de Groot schrieb: >> On 1 May 2013 18:04, Fabio Erculiani wrote: >>> It looks like there is some consensus on the effort of making systemd >>> more accessible, while there are problems with su

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users

2013-05-08 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: > On 8 May 2013 23:39, Fabio Erculiani wrote: >> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: >>> On 1 May 2013 18:04, Fabio Erculiani wrote: >>>> It looks like there is some consensus on the effo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users

2013-05-15 Thread Fabio Erculiani
t to do then? Isolate from the rest of the world? (It's not a sarcastic question). I hope that everybody does their own reality check. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users

2013-05-18 Thread Fabio Erculiani
ctly by upstream projects would reduce our maintenance burden in the long run. Anyway, I'm not trying to convince anybody in using either init systems, I am just suggesting that you should try both and decide yourself. Which translated, is the same goal as making systemd more accessible to you. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: eselect init

2013-06-02 Thread Fabio Erculiani
; #friendly-coders -- We're friendly, but we're not /that/ friendly ;-) > -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Temporary DevRel actions for CoC violations

2013-06-20 Thread Fabio Erculiani
The final outcome I would love to see is that everybody eventually graduates from kindergarten :-) And perhaps introduce a "culture-fit" score in the recruiting, mentoring process. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect init

2013-06-20 Thread Fabio Erculiani
stemd-love/commit/ced29311348a81a2573b030b1316f1c3a0335c5b [2] https://github.com/Sabayon/systemd-love/commit/9eea3ff713c8fa0391e7b1bfa494d533dc21c0be [3] https://github.com/Sabayon/systemd-love/blob/master/eclass/eselect-init.eclass -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Temporary DevRel actions for CoC violations

2013-06-20 Thread Fabio Erculiani
Thanks for the offer, I appreciate it, but I have to decline this time. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect init

2013-06-21 Thread Fabio Erculiani
worth the porting, etc). Making the switch between openrc and systemd easy is a big win (for both developers, distro maintainers, users) and makes Gentoo more attractive, but this is another topic... -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect init

2013-06-21 Thread Fabio Erculiani
Fix the reason why the wrapper got broken then. If the wrapper broke, it is most likely a symptom of a bigger problem. I think that sysvinit's /sbin/init should be renamed to /sbin/sysvinit (or /bin/sysvinit?), anyway... -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-kernel] Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patches and configuration.

2013-07-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
I believe that end users would benefit more from kernel binary ebuilds (ebuilds building an actual kernel with an official config), rather than all this. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-kernel] Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patches and configuration.

2013-07-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El lun, 01-07-2013 a las 21:55 +0200, Fabio Erculiani escribió: >> I believe that end users would benefit more from kernel binary ebuilds >> (ebuilds building an actual kernel with an official config), rather >> than all

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-kernel] Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patches and configuration.

2013-07-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
es apart, I've been using it in production for almost 2 years now (can't remember exactly). > > -- > Regards, > Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer > http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang > -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-kernel] Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patches and configuration.

2013-07-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Christoph Junghans wrote: > 2013/7/1 Fabio Erculiani : >> I believe that end users would benefit more from kernel binary ebuilds >> (ebuilds building an actual kernel with an official config), rather >> than all this. > +1 > > The &q

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-kernel] Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patches and configuration.

2013-07-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
> -- >>> Regards, >>> Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer >>> http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang >>> >> >> > > > -- > Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. > Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] > E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org > GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA > GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA > > -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patches and configuration.

2013-07-02 Thread Fabio Erculiani
does not support > devtmpfs > (easy to check by /proc/filesystems) No. As explained multiple times, this check is not reliable and doesn't work (chroot, binpkgs, containers without kernel, and so on...). Making sure that the user doesn't build an unbootable kernel is the way to go. > > -- > > Sergei -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Running tests using virtualx.eclass should be allowed to be forced to run in virtual X always

2013-07-19 Thread Fabio Erculiani
times and randomly pick an initial state to see if you spot a "scenario" in where you have problems (concurrency problems)... :-) > > > Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes > flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Autobuilds go to /experimental and to /releases only when someone actually tests them

2013-07-27 Thread Fabio Erculiani
Some time ago I was also thinking about writing a test framework for testing live images through kvm. Of course I didn't manage to find time to try to arrange something in the end, but the idea is still popping up in my mind every now and then. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8

2013-08-08 Thread Fabio Erculiani
ou understand that some of us will be very rude and just suggest > to unmerge gnome on all support requests as it now moves outside our > support range ... > > Have a nice day, > > Patrick > > -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8

2013-08-08 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: >> Moreover, the lvm problem is caused by a very ancient and ill decision >> about doing what upstream tells you to avoid: have mdev in the >> initramfs and udev on t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] OpenRc-0.12 is coming soon

2013-08-16 Thread Fabio Erculiani
trate my gratitude. > > So yep, ~arch being *this* broken is not so nice > > -- > Regards, > Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer > http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang > -- Fabio Erculiani

[gentoo-dev] Doing and then undoing slotmoves

2013-12-18 Thread Fabio Erculiani
://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/updates/2Q-2013?r1=1.1&r2=1.2 -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Doing and then undoing slotmoves

2013-12-18 Thread Fabio Erculiani
slotmove lines. > > Paweł > -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] [OT] pkgcore bikeshed (was Portage team)

2014-01-13 Thread Fabio Erculiani
ame time. Yeah, this is probably bad design... -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] [OT] pkgcore bikeshed (was Portage team)

2014-01-13 Thread Fabio Erculiani
or little reason (a single vdb.dbapi.match() can eat 100MB of RAM). We know how Python deals with freed memory... Sigh... > > -A > >> >> >> -- >> Luis Ressel >> GPG fpr: F08D 2AF6 655E 25DE 52BC E53D 08F5 7F90 3029 B5BD > > -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles?

2014-05-30 Thread Fabio Erculiani
You can't toss out a tool and ask for it to be a > recommendation but point to others that you think need to maintain its > configuration. > > Rich > -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles?

2014-05-31 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On May 31, 2014 8:42 PM, "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:10:40PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: > > I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings, > > ... to genkernel repository for: > > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828 > > > > I'l

Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles?

2014-05-31 Thread Fabio Erculiani
x: Developer, Infrastructure Lead > E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org > GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 > -- Fabio Erculiani

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2014-06-08 Thread Fabio Erculiani
potlighter x11-apps/python-whiteboard x11-apps/whyteboard x11-drivers/cwiid -- Fabio Erculiani

[gentoo-dev] Help offered - Portage tree

2008-03-12 Thread Fabio Erculiani
g/?p=105 After having discussed with one of your dev about it, he suggested me to ask here looking for a mentor. If there's anything I can do, I'm ready. Despite some of you might think, I love Gentoo since 2001 :) Cheers -- Fabio Erculiani Information and Communication Technologies

Re: [gentoo-dev] Help offered - Portage tree

2008-03-12 Thread Fabio Erculiani
quite big and I always have to be quick. So, to sum up, if we can build a better communication way it could be useful for both sides. On 3/13/08, Jan Kundrát <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fabio Erculiani wrote: > > I offer my help to fix DEPEND/RDEPEND split issues which is caus

Re: [gentoo-dev] Help offered - Portage tree

2008-03-13 Thread Fabio Erculiani
day is over. I'm busy preparing a release, sorry. Probably some of them are ok, but I don't think all. Using http://packages.sabayonlinux.org interface you can query all our bins. -- Fabio Erculiani Information and Communication Technologies Consultant Sabayon Linux Chief Architect

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] New developer: Fabio Erculiani (lxnay)

2009-09-28 Thread Fabio Erculiani
s patience. Regards, -- Fabio Erculiani http://www.sabayon.org http://www.gentoo.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA Documentation

2009-12-28 Thread Fabio Erculiani
from the University of Milano-Bicocca to add some static analysis bits into the workflow. Maybe, there are some commonalities between the two ideas (tinderbox vs what Sabayon is doing already). -- Fabio Erculiani http://www.sabayon.org http://www.gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] x11-libs/lib*: wrong RDEPENDs bug

2009-12-28 Thread Fabio Erculiani
y decide how to deal with those. Because most of the ebuilds don't seem to follow your logic. -- Fabio Erculiani http://www.sabayon.org http://www.gentoo.org

  1   2   >