e's no intention to remove
stage1/stage2 tarballs in the future because that would be a really a bad thing
imho.
Cheers
--
Andrea Barisani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.*.
Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Developer V
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 10:14:04AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 15:37 +0100, Andrea Barisani wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 02:47:45PM +, Kurt Lieber wrote:
> > > We have received *numerous* complaints from users about the decision to
> >
thing..this is not the point).
[CCing [EMAIL PROTECTED] because this concerns the team as well imho.]
Just my 2 eurocent.
P.S.
I know that firefox doesn't trust /etc/ssl/certs by default, dunno about
konqueror. The point is still relevant though.
--
Andrea Barisani <[EMAIL PR
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:55 +0100, Andrea Barisani wrote:
> > Regarding the inclusion of ca-certificates as a PDEPEND (yeah a brief
> > exchange of emails already happened on -dev but since it's not so easy to
> > t
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:21:42PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
>
> 9.1.2006, 17:12:31, Andrea Barisani wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Do you think the PDEPEND of the ca-certs should be tied to a USE= flag?
>
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 06:03:03PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
>
> 9.1.2006, 17:28:04, Andrea Barisani wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:21:42PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
> >>
> >> 9.1.2006, 17:12:31, Andrea Barisani wrote:
> >>
> >> >
even if it's not, much caution is advised
security-wise in who you trust and what you are going to put in the tree (and
most important what the perception of your authority/reliability will be
user-wise).
Cheers
--
Andrea Barisani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.*.
Gentoo
Today's lesson in political correctness: "Go asphyxiate on a phallus"
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
--
Andrea Barisani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.*.
Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Developer V
Hi folks, I'm retiring.
I was maintaining the following packages:
app-admin/tenshi (note: I'm upstream as well)
mail-mta/sendmail
net-analyzer/scapy
net-analyzer/ftester (note: I'm upstream as well)
So those needs new maintainership.
Cheers
--
Andrea Barisani &l
leaving
user_defined one if any) if the userbase of this ml is happy to deal without
it.
Cheers
--
Andrea Barisani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.*.
Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Developer V
(
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 06:06:18PM +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> maillog: 14/04/2005-11:01:19(+0200): Andrea Barisani types
> > I'm prefectly happy with removing our reply-to header (and leaving
> > user_defined one if any) if the userbase of this ml is happy to deal without
@lists.gentoo.org
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
There's no reference to @gentoo.org and our main MX server is rewriting
@gentoo.org
to @lists.gentoo.org every time. Are you seeing @gentoo.org in those headers
in the messages you are getting?
Bye
--
Andrea Barisani <[EMAI
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 12:52:33PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Andrea Barisani wrote:
> | There's no reference to @gentoo.org and our main MX server is
> rewriting @gentoo.org
> | to @lists.gentoo.org every time.
i (or something like that) access for hosting files be acceptable?
Seriously security_wise and admin_wise I don't see shell access useful neither
appropriate imho.
Btw how many forums moderators are we talking about?
Cheers
--
Andrea Barisani &l
14 matches
Mail list logo
