The QA team has approved a new policy [1], effective immediately:
| LICENSE must not contain variables
|
| PG: 0106
| Source: QA
| Reported: no
|
| The LICENSE variable in an ebuild must specify all the license names
| verbatim, without referring to any variables. The only exception is
| (im
Signed-off-by: WANG Xuerui
---
eclass/acct-group.eclass | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/acct-group.eclass b/eclass/acct-group.eclass
index 56b76ba1885..3d02e4f713b 100644
--- a/eclass/acct-group.eclass
+++ b/eclass/acct-group.eclass
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-
Posting to mailing list mainly because of the eclass changes, however
trivial the changes might be. The portage patch is already upstream but
not in a tagged release yet.
This is part of the draft PR: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/25183
over at GitHub.
WANG Xuerui (3):
acct-group.eclass
Signed-off-by: WANG Xuerui
---
eclass/acct-user.eclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/acct-user.eclass b/eclass/acct-user.eclass
index c7c32086ad2..c87b27f3cca 100644
--- a/eclass/acct-user.eclass
+++ b/eclass/acct-user.eclass
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ readon
Signed-off-by: WANG Xuerui
---
.../portage/files/3.0.30-loong-abis.patch | 133 +
sys-apps/portage/portage-3.0.30-r5.ebuild | 277 ++
2 files changed, 410 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 sys-apps/portage/files/3.0.30-loong-abis.patch
create mode 100644 sys-apps/
On 4/24/22 23:21, WANG Xuerui wrote:
Posting to mailing list mainly because of the eclass changes, however
trivial the changes might be. The portage patch is already upstream but
not in a tagged release yet.
This is part of the draft PR: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/25183
over at GitHu
On Sun, 2022-04-24 at 23:21 +0800, WANG Xuerui wrote:
> Signed-off-by: WANG Xuerui
> ---
> .../portage/files/3.0.30-loong-abis.patch | 133 +
>
Why add a patch when we can make a new Portage release with this?
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
Hi,
On 4/25/22 01:57, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sun, 2022-04-24 at 23:21 +0800, WANG Xuerui wrote:
Signed-off-by: WANG Xuerui
---
.../portage/files/3.0.30-loong-abis.patch | 133 +
Why add a patch when we can make a new Portage release with this?
I saw many other changes on the m
On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 1:56 PM Matt Turner wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 1:53 AM James Le Cuirot wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2022-04-02 at 21:35 -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> > > # Matt Turner (2022-03-27)
> > > # Dead package. Homepage doesn't resolve. Unmaintained in Gentoo for at
> > > # least 6
On Sun, 2022-04-24 at 13:29 -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 1:56 PM Matt Turner wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 1:53 AM James Le Cuirot wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2022-04-02 at 21:35 -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> > > > # Matt Turner (2022-03-27)
> > > > # Dead package. H
On Sat, 2022-04-02 at 21:35 -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> # Matt Turner (2022-03-27)
> # Dead package. Homepage doesn't resolve. Unmaintained in Gentoo for at
> # least 6 years.
> # Removal on 2022-05-02
> app-pda/gtkpod
Last rites has been cancelled. I'm taking over as maintainer.
signature.asc
On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 3:14 PM James Le Cuirot wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2022-04-02 at 21:35 -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> > # Matt Turner (2022-03-27)
> > # Dead package. Homepage doesn't resolve. Unmaintained in Gentoo for at
> > # least 6 years.
> > # Removal on 2022-05-02
> > app-pda/gtkpod
>
> Last
> On 15 Apr 2022, at 02:38, John Helmert III wrote:
>
> Hi all! Currently all security bugs are assigned to security@g.o,
> always. This can easily lead to some confusion about who needs to do
> something about a given bug; right now this is generally tracked by
> whiteboard magic strings that
13 matches
Mail list logo
