On Sun, 2022-04-24 at 13:29 -0700, Matt Turner wrote: > On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 1:56 PM Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 1:53 AM James Le Cuirot <ch...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 2022-04-02 at 21:35 -0700, Matt Turner wrote: > > > > # Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> (2022-03-27) > > > > # Dead package. Homepage doesn't resolve. Unmaintained in Gentoo for at > > > > # least 6 years. > > > > # Removal on 2022-05-02 > > > > app-pda/gtkpod > > > > > > I do still use this on rare occasions. It's not my favourite program but > > > there > > > are no good alternatives, short of using Rhythmbox, which does more than I > > > want. I'm not aware that it's actually broken, aside from a couple of > > > minor > > > warts in the package. Does it have to go? > > > > No, if you want to keep it -- feel free. I just saw it because it's > > the only reverse dependency of dev-util/anjuta which looks pretty dead > > itself, and then I saw how much more dead gtkpod looks. > > > > If you can break the dependence on anjuta (which I didn't > > investigate), I'd have no problem keeping it. Would be nice to have an > > actual maintainer as well. > > > Removal date is approaching. Are you planning to take this?
Sorry, I kept putting this off. Yeah, I'll take it... for now. :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part