[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: dev-libs/qrosscore

2021-11-30 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2021-11-30) # No revdeps, bug #774498; masked for removal on 2021-12-30. dev-libs/qrosscore signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python packages up for grabs

2021-11-30 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Mon, 29 Nov 2021, Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 2021-11-29 at 14:44 +0100, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > > I don't really use any of these anymore, so I'd love for someone else to > > maintain them: > > > > dev-python/pockets > > dev-python/pycodestyle > > dev-python/pynacl > > Please reassi

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: allow -1 for ACCT_USER_ID and ACCT_GROUP_ID in ::gentoo

2021-11-30 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021, James Cloos wrote: > "UM" == Ulrich Mueller writes: UM> Also, why would one allocate UIDs in the 500..999 range (1000 is fine, UM> actually)? Gentoo always had UID_MIN=1000 and SYS_UID_MAX=999. > why do you thing gentoo is everyone's first or only dist on their > n

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: dev-python/python-fcl

2021-11-30 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2021-11-30) # Blocks cleanup of sci-libs/fcl-0.5.0, unmaintained in Gentoo. # Upstream master claims to target sci-libs/fcl-0.6.1, but that # requires someone adopting the package. # Bug #770589; masked for removal on 2021-12-30. dev-python/python-fcl signature.asc Descri

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] pam.eclass: Support EAPI-8, add missing || die

2021-11-30 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/811363 --- eclass/pam.eclass | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/pam.eclass b/eclass/pam.eclass index 0b3421b5e7c..effd17ad55d 100644 --- a/eclass/pam.eclass +++ b/eclass/pam.eclass @@ -6,14 +6,14 @@ # Mikle Kolyada #

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] pam.eclass: Drop EAPI-5 support

2021-11-30 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
No more consumers for some time. --- eclass/pam.eclass | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/pam.eclass b/eclass/pam.eclass index effd17ad55d..38326682b3f 100644 --- a/eclass/pam.eclass +++ b/eclass/pam.eclass @@ -6,14 +6,14 @@ # Mikle Kolyada # @AUTHOR

[gentoo-dev] last rites: net-vpn/badvpn

2021-11-30 Thread William Hubbs
# William Hubbs (2021-11-30) # Dead upstream, no releases since 2015 # Bug #770619; masked for removal on 2021-12-30. net-vpn/badvpn Thanks, William signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] pam.eclass: Support EAPI-8, add missing || die

2021-11-30 Thread Mikhail Koliada
On 30.11.2021 18:01, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/811363 --- eclass/pam.eclass | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/pam.eclass b/eclass/pam.eclass index 0b3421b5e7c..effd17ad55d 100644 --- a/eclass/pam.eclass +++ b/e

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] dissolving project netmon

2021-11-30 Thread Jonas Stein
Dear all, the project netmon is openly discussed as "dead" since years. We should not blame its members, but the fact that the packages in netmon are very different and should not be clustered in one project. Thanks to everyone who helped out with bugs assigned to netmon. I suggest to reassig

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: allow -1 for ACCT_USER_ID and ACCT_GROUP_ID in ::gentoo

2021-11-30 Thread James Cloos
> "UM" == Ulrich Mueller writes: UM> I was specifically asking about Gentoo infra there. ah; i completely missed that bit. sorry for the misunderstanding. -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] tmpfiles.eclass: add eapi 8 support

2021-11-30 Thread William Hubbs
Signed-off-by: William Hubbs --- eclass/tmpfiles.eclass | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/tmpfiles.eclass b/eclass/tmpfiles.eclass index b9238a6434a..7a0e2cb7265 100644 --- a/eclass/tmpfiles.eclass +++ b/eclass/tmpfiles.eclass @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ # @AUTHO

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: allow -1 for ACCT_USER_ID and ACCT_GROUP_ID in ::gentoo

2021-11-30 Thread William Hubbs
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 12:59:18PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Nov 2021, James Cloos wrote: > > > "UM" == Ulrich Mueller writes: > UM> Also, why would one allocate UIDs in the 500..999 range (1000 is fine, > UM> actually)? Gentoo always had UID_MIN=1000 and SYS_UID_MAX=999

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: allow -1 for ACCT_USER_ID and ACCT_GROUP_ID in ::gentoo

2021-11-30 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 19:32 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > > This is the part of this that I don't understand. If we aren't enforcing > an ID, why do we care which ID to try first? It seems to be an > unnecessary step since users can pick the IDs they want by putting > settings in make.conf. > Th

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: allow -1 for ACCT_USER_ID and ACCT_GROUP_ID in ::gentoo

2021-11-30 Thread Jaco Kroon
Hi, On 2021/12/01 03:32, William Hubbs wrote: > This is the part of this that I don't understand. If we aren't enforcing > an ID, why do we care which ID to try first? It seems to be an > unnecessary step since users can pick the IDs they want by putting > settings in make.conf. Because when runn

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: allow -1 for ACCT_USER_ID and ACCT_GROUP_ID in ::gentoo

2021-11-30 Thread Alec Warner
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:16 PM Jaco Kroon wrote: > > Hi, > > On 2021/12/01 03:32, William Hubbs wrote: > > This is the part of this that I don't understand. If we aren't enforcing > > an ID, why do we care which ID to try first? It seems to be an > > unnecessary step since users can pick the IDs

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: allow -1 for ACCT_USER_ID and ACCT_GROUP_ID in ::gentoo

2021-11-30 Thread Jaco Kroon
Hi, On 2021/12/01 08:45, Alec Warner wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:16 PM Jaco Kroon wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 2021/12/01 03:32, William Hubbs wrote: >>> This is the part of this that I don't understand. If we aren't enforcing >>> an ID, why do we care which ID to try first? It seems to be an