On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
wrote:
> Btw, since Gentoo do not (mostly) provide packages itself, but only build
> instructions (ebuild), can't we just ship ebuild that "patches" openldap
> violates to force to use db6>=19 with "bindist" USE?
>
Can we do it legally?
request for review before committing, suggestions welcome since it's
rather short what
i got to say
thanks,
Samuli
Title: Upgrade to udev >= 217 or eudev >= 2.1
Author: Samuli Suominen
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2014-10-29
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Installed: = 3.7
kernel
On 29/10/14 07:28 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> request for review before committing, suggestions welcome since it's
> rather short what
> i got to say
>
> thanks,
> Samuli
>
typical news items are in the format " no longer/now do
. [ is >.] if you need , do
. if you do not need , do ."
[blah bl
On 27/10/14 12:07, M. Ziebell wrote:
Does clang compile glibc already?
At the last GNU Cauldron the speaker said that clang fails because
of:[1]
- nested functions
- VLAIS
How did you avoid that problem?
musl is known to work fine.
On 29/10/14 13:42, Alex Xu wrote:
> On 29/10/14 07:28 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> request for review before committing, suggestions welcome since it's
>> rather short what
>> i got to say
>>
>> thanks,
>> Samuli
>>
> typical news items are in the format " no longer/now do
> . [ is >.] if you nee
I own a dedicated server (i-3770, 4 real + 4 HT cores w/ 3.4 GHz) with 16 GB
RAM and 2 x 3 TB hard disk, 1 GBit/s network.
Currently 7.6 cpus do run idle at 1.6 GHz (cpu governor ondemand), 10 GB RAM
are unused and 4.5 TB disk are not even allocated. It might be that I oversized
it for the curr
Am Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:39:33 +0100
schrieb Luca Barbato :
> On 27/10/14 12:07, M. Ziebell wrote:
> > Does clang compile glibc already?
> > At the last GNU Cauldron the speaker said that clang fails because
> > of:[1]
> > - nested functions
> > - VLAIS
> >
> > How did you avoid that problem?
>
> m
