Am Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:39:33 +0100
schrieb Luca Barbato <lu_z...@gentoo.org>:

> On 27/10/14 12:07, M. Ziebell wrote:
> > Does clang compile glibc already?
> > At the last GNU Cauldron the speaker said that clang fails because
> > of:[1]
> > - nested functions
> > - VLAIS
> >
> > How did you avoid that problem?
> 
> musl is known to work fine.
> 
> 

True. A good point for the (sub)profile idea.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to