On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 11:06 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> No sir, I was not telling a half-truth.
>
> If the default configuration is stored in /lib/udev/rules.d for example,
> and you can override that default by dropping files of the same name in
> /etc/udev/rules.d, I don't see what the concern
On 02/03/14 19:51, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 05:49:59PM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
>> Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
>>> Sure at some point you have to make things evolve but this upstream
>>> solution simply isn't nice for its users.
>> That may be, but I don't think it's a dist
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Wyatt Epp wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 11:06 AM, William Hubbs
> wrote:
> >
> > No sir, I was not telling a half-truth.
> >
> > If the default configuration is stored in /lib/udev/rules.d for example,
> > and you can override that default by dropping files of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I'm tired of looking all the maintainers up manually and adding each
one to CC list of bug reports.
Why is there no herd or project?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTFN+VAAoJECIM0cW97tAgXtgQALWR5rFkNEU8ZEH/1Miw+7dx
3iKkFuJkpOdDJa1EARq7
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
>
> Many of the config files are large, and splitting them into segments makes
> it easier to read.
>
Ah, no, impedance mismatch. Split configs are easy-- /etc/env.d/ took
something like two minutes to grasp years ago.
To clarify, I was more dis
Dnia 2014-03-03, o godz. 20:01:25
hasufell napisał(a):
> I'm tired of looking all the maintainers up manually and adding each
> one to CC list of bug reports.
>
> Why is there no herd or project?
Not sure what gentoo-dev ml has to do with it...
...but I've filed bug 503354 [1] to create the al
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2014 03:19 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-03-03, o godz. 20:01:25 hasufell
> napisał(a):
>
>> I'm tired of looking all the maintainers up manually and adding
>> each one to CC list of bug reports.
>>
>> Why is there no herd or project?
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Wyatt Epp wrote:
> If the _only_ way to get the config for something is ever to run a
> specific command specifically tailored for that purpose, then it's
> evidence of a truly shocking and advanced sadism (not to mention a
> complete and utter failure of software e
On 03/03/14 23:13, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Wyatt Epp wrote:
>> If the _only_ way to get the config for something is ever to run a
>> specific command specifically tailored for that purpose, then it's
>> evidence of a truly shocking and advanced sadism (not to mention
