Hello,
I've updated the autodep and testing it now.
I've fixed a problem with the integration of autodep in the newest version
of Portage, but I think I did it in a hackish way. I want to ask if it is
possble to solve it better.
First, some words about the architecture of autodep. Autodep consis
Hi,
I don't use the listed packages anymore so feel free to take those:
net-analyzer/mk-livestatus
net-misc/igmpproxy
x11-misc/tint2
x11-misc/tintwizard
net-misc/cfengine - I'll just keep maintaining Cfengine 2.x for now since
we/Infra still use it.
--
Regards,
Christian Ruppert
Gentoo Linux de
* Christian Ruppert schrieb am 22.02.14 um 14:57 Uhr:
Hi,
I don't use the listed packages anymore so feel free to take those:
net-analyzer/mk-livestatus
net-misc/igmpproxy
x11-misc/tint2
x11-misc/tintwizard
net-misc/cfengine - I'll just keep maintaining Cfengine 2.x for now since
we/Infra still
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> Currently, the MATE overlay has 14 meta-base packages and 16 mate-extra
> packages; this might slightly change when reconsidering if their
> location is alright, however it is near the average (~15) per category
> so that should be fit.
That
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:16:11 +0100
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Tom Wijsman
> wrote:
> > Currently, the MATE overlay has 14 meta-base packages and 16
> > mate-extra packages; this might slightly change when reconsidering
> > if their location is alright, however it
Tom Wijsman posted on Sat, 22 Feb 2014 18:08:24 +0100 as excerpted:
>> That seems a little on the small side? Can we just do a single category
>> for all of it, instead? People can go bikeshed on the name.
>
> TL;DR: Yes, we could try that; but what would be a consistent name?
mate-desktop ?
(T
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:33:57 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Tom Wijsman posted on Sat, 22 Feb 2014 18:08:24 +0100 as excerpted:
>
> >> That seems a little on the small side? Can we just do a single
> >> category for all of it, instead? People can go bikeshed on the
> >> name.
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> While still inconsistent with what already exists, that indeed sounds
> sane towards the user, +1; does someone object 'mate-desktop'?
I was thinking mate-de, but -desktop seems okay, too.
Anyway, you should probably give people some time to
On 02/23/2014 05:02 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:33:57 + (UTC)
> Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> Tom Wijsman posted on Sat, 22 Feb 2014 18:08:24 +0100 as excerpted:
>>
That seems a little on the small side? Can we just do a single
category for all of it,
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:26:18 +0200
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Bye bye distribution level consistency :-(
The last time we had distribution level consistency was the moment between the
first and second packages getting committed to the tree.
--
Ryan Hillpsn: dirtyepic_sk
On 2/19/14, 8:05 AM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
> Am I right I have to make a local repo to test if it's build.
Yeah, I suggest just using /usr/local/portage and adding it to
PORTDIR_OVERLAY in make.conf.
> And does ebuild x.ebuild manifest also builds the package or do I have
> to use emerge x for th
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 05:16:55 -0500
Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> The other unfortunate aspect of the gtk3 flag is that it encourages
> using flags instead of slotting for libraries that can support both gtk
> and gtk3, resulting in needless rebuilds of when one of the flags is
> switched on/off.
On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 14:57 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> wxGTK not only splits up libraries by version and toolkit, but also by charset
> and debug/release. If we had to use different SLOTs rather than USE flags we
> would need eight of them for 2.8 alone. And I don't know how we would name
> the
>
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 16:09:53 -0500
Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 14:57 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > wxGTK not only splits up libraries by version and toolkit, but also by
> > charset and debug/release. If we had to use different SLOTs rather than
> > USE flags we would need
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 15:50:17 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 16:09:53 -0500
> Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 14:57 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > > wxGTK not only splits up libraries by version and toolkit, but also by
> > > charset and debug/release. If we h
On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 15:59 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 15:50:17 -0600
> Ryan Hill wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 16:09:53 -0500
> > Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 14:57 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > > > wxGTK not only splits up libraries by versio
Am Samstag, 22. Februar 2014, 19:02:54 schrieb Tom Wijsman:
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:33:57 + (UTC)
>
>
> (Or do we want a consistent 'mate-base' / 'mate-extra' approach?)
If there is a clear distinction between a core set of packages and extra stuff
(as in e.g. kde4), the combination mate-b
17 matches
Mail list logo
