On 13 August 2013 10:51, heroxbd wrote:
> Dear Fellows,
>
> Canonical is raising money by pushing their concept of Ubuntu for
> Android[1][2]. The idea is to put GNU environment (esp. Ubuntu userland)
> in parallel to Android to drive the external HDMI output with X11
> protocal, so that desktop a
# Michał Górny (16 Aug 2013)
# Getting more broken every day. No commit for 5 years. Nothing
# in the tree uses it. Please consider dev-python/pygpgme instead.
# Bug #339409. Masked for removal in 30 days.
dev-python/pyme
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
wrote:
>
> If upstream doesn't support something it's not a regression. This
> upstream removes features all the time in the name of progress. Either
> get on the train or get run over by it. If /usr isn't mounted at boot
> then systemd
On 14 August 2013 16:43, Keith Dart wrote:
> Re , William Hubbs said:
>> All,
>>
>> This message is an announcement and a reminder.
>>
>> OpenRc-0.12 will be introduced to the portage tree in the next few
>> days.
>>
>> If you are using ~arch OpenRc, the standard disclaimer applies:
>> remember th
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 14 August 2013 16:43, Keith Dart wrote:
>> Re , William Hubbs said:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> This message is an announcement and a reminder.
>>>
>>> OpenRc-0.12 will be introduced to the portage tree in the next few
>>> days.
>>>
>>> If you are
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> The package is now masked (openrc-0.12) because quite a few people
> lost their net configs
>
> So yep, ~arch being *this* broken is not so nice
And hence the value of having a group of volunteer guinea pigs
(anybody running ~arch) is dem
* Rich Freeman [130816 10:43]:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> > The package is now masked (openrc-0.12) because quite a few people
> > lost their net configs
> >
> > So yep, ~arch being *this* broken is not so nice
>
> And hence the value of having a group of volunt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 16/08/13 10:57 AM, Todd Goodman wrote:
> * Rich Freeman [130816 10:43]:
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Markos Chandras
>> wrote:
>>> The package is now masked (openrc-0.12) because quite a few
>>> people lost their net configs
>>>
>>> So
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> For everyone's information -- The conf.d/net removal on upgrade is a
> packaging issue, which could not have been tested prior to
> openrc-0.12.ebuild hitting the tree. There are details in
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48133
Hello,
gtk is a global use flag [1], gtk2 and gtk3 are used in metadata.xml [2].
Is there a consensus how to use these flags if an app provides gtk2
and gtk3 gui in parallel or exclusive?
Michael
[1] /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc
gtk - Add support for x11-libs/gtk+ (The GIMP Toolkit)
[2] egr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420493
gtk2 and gtk3 useflags are discouraged and should only be used in
special cases
file a bug for those if there is not one already
On 08/16/2013 07:12 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> gtk is a glob
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please let the python herd review distutils-r1 conversions until you
feel safe about it.
On 08/16/2013 11:54 AM, Manuel Rueger (mrueg) wrote:
> Index: synaptiks-0.8.1-r3.ebuild
> ===
>
On 17 August 2013 01:12, Michael Weber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> gtk is a global use flag [1], gtk2 and gtk3 are used in metadata.xml [2].
>
> Is there a consensus how to use these flags if an app provides gtk2
> and gtk3 gui in parallel or exclusive?
>
> Michael
>
> [1] /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc
>
# Manuel Rüger (16 Aug 2013)
# Outdated documentation as ruby18 will be removed.
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
dev-ruby/programming-ruby
Kind regards,
Manuel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
> On Sat, 17 Aug 2013, Ben de Groot wrote:
> As mentioned on IRC, there's this:
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gnome_Team_Policies#gtk3
Does this reflect usage of the flags in the tree? Looking at the list
in the original posting, the most common pattern seems to be USE=gtk
to enable GTK+, an
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:46:34PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote
> Also, it really isn't Gentoo-specific, but putting /etc in a git repo
> is a really good practice, and I'm wondering if it should go in the
> handbook as a result.
For regular users, who won't be up to developer standards, maybe the
Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:46:34PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote
>
>> Also, it really isn't Gentoo-specific, but putting /etc in a git repo
>> is a really good practice, and I'm wondering if it should go in the
>> handbook as a result.
> For regular users, who won't be up to deve
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > For everyone's information -- The conf.d/net removal on upgrade is a
> > packaging issue, which could not have been tested prior to
> > openrc-0.12.ebuild hitting the tree. Ther
Doug Goldstein wrote:
>
> sys-apps/etckeeper is what you want. Works great. It even has portage
> integration. Though I'd recommend going with the ~arch version instead
> of stable for that portion.
>
> --
> Doug Goldstein
I think this is something dispatch-conf does too. I use that but still
ma
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:56:42 +0200
Luca Barbato wrote:
> > We don't build glibc with -O3. Other libc's should either not use -O3 or
> > use -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns where applicable.
>
> On certain arches the memcpy tranformation happens even on lower
> optimization levels or so I saw
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:05:22 + (UTC)
"Doug Goldstein (cardoe)" wrote:
> cardoe 13/08/16 14:05:22
>
> Modified: qemu-.ebuild ChangeLog
> Added:qemu-1.6.0.ebuild
> Log:
> Version bump
...
> + >=sys-firmware/seabios-1.7.3
Does it imply 1
21 matches
Mail list logo
