* Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> [130816 10:43]: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Markos Chandras <hwoar...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > The package is now masked (openrc-0.12) because quite a few people > > lost their net configs > > > > So yep, ~arch being *this* broken is not so nice > > And hence the value of having a group of volunteer guinea pigs > (anybody running ~arch) is demonstrated. That said, masking big > changes and calling for volunteers among the volunteers doesn't hurt. > > Seems like we need to be more careful with code that runs outside the > sandbox. Config protection is nice, but it is useless when code runs > outside the sandbox. > > Rich
As one of those volunteer guinea pigs it all worked fine with the four ~x86 and three ~amd64 machines I've upgraded to openrc-0.12:0. They vary in when they were installed from 2005 up to a couple months ago and are generally updated daily. All ~x86 are "servers" (though most have X, KDE, and Gnome installed, they're only accessed remotely.) Two of the ~amd64 machines are "desktops" (though they both run services as "servers.") If I can help narrow anything down further I'm happy to help. Or to test anything. Todd
