[gentoo-dev] Re: revbumping ebuilds after USE dependency changes

On 25/07/2013 05:17, Michał Górny wrote: Actually per PMS you are required to revbump (and therefore require upgrade on users' side) whenever you change the deps and don't expect to add a new version soon enough. Can you please provide a link/reference to that part? I am interested in reading

Re: [gentoo-dev] revbumping ebuilds after USE dependency changes

Alex Alexander wrote: > Hello, > > Please revbump an ebuild after changing its USE dependencies. > > Using net-p2p/transmission as an example, it used to depend on > dev-qt/qtgui:4=[dbus] > however, qtgui lost the dbus useflag, so the dependency was changed to > dev-qt/qtgui:4=[dbus(+)] > w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: revbumping ebuilds after USE dependency changes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> Shall we revisit that, and try to make portage behave more correctly, >> even if it means more revbumps / rebuilding? > > Just set EMERGE_DEFAULT_DEPS="--dynamic-deps=n" in make.conf if you'd > like to test it. > > What (if anything) does that br

[gentoo-dev] RFC: toolchain-r1.eclass

About one month ago I've filed about modernizing toolchain.eclass by creating new toolchain-r1.eclass and migrating ebuilds using it to the new eclass. Please see attachments and review the code. One issue has already been raised, and it's prefix-r

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: toolchain-r1.eclass

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:26 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > Then there is a question whether toolchain packages should use EAPI 5, EAPI=5 would be useful for both the mips team (for bug 477956) and for catalyst builders (for subslot dependencies when dealing with binary packages).

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: revbumping ebuilds after USE dependency changes

On 07/25/2013 08:29 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: >>> Shall we revisit that, and try to make portage behave more correctly, >>> even if it means more revbumps / rebuilding? > >> Just set EMERGE_DEFAULT_DEPS="--dynamic-deps=n" in make.conf if you'd >> like to test it. > > > What (if anythin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: revbumping ebuilds after USE dependency changes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/25/2013 01:28 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 07/25/2013 08:29 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: Shall we revisit that, and try to make portage behave more correctly, even if it means more revbumps / rebuilding? >> >>> Just set EMERGE_DEFA

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: revbumping ebuilds after USE dependency changes

On 07/25/2013 11:29 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > On 07/25/2013 01:28 PM, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 07/25/2013 08:29 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > Shall we revisit that, and try to make portage behave more correctly, > even if it means more revbumps / rebuilding? >>> Just

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Council constituent meeting 30 July 2013 at 19:00 UTC

Rich Freeman wrote: > Roy Bamford wrote: > > The open floor is a part of the openness and approachability of the > > council. Its 60 seconds well spent, even if nobody says anything. > > The concern that was raised was that when it does get used it is rare > for anything to get accomplished. The

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: toolchain-r1.eclass

On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:26:48 -0700 ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote: > About one month ago I've filed > about modernizing > toolchain.eclass by creating new toolchain-r1.eclass and migrating > ebuilds using it to the new eclass. > > Please see attachme

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: toolchain-r1.eclass

El jue, 25-07-2013 a las 22:30 -0600, Ryan Hill escribió: > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:26:48 -0700 > ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote: > > > About one month ago I've filed > > about modernizing > > toolchain.eclass by creating new toolchain-r1.eclass and mi