On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:26:48 -0700 ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" <phajdan...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> About one month ago I've filed > <https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474358> about modernizing > toolchain.eclass by creating new toolchain-r1.eclass and migrating > ebuilds using it to the new eclass. > > Please see attachments and review the code. > > One issue has already been raised, and it's prefix-related changes. I > don't know what to change there, but I'm happy to test suggested changes. > > Then there is a question whether toolchain packages should use EAPI 5, > and I think providing an upgrade path is a good concern. Given > portage/python constraints though, it seems to me it would be fine. If > you think it'd be better, I could use a lower EAPI just in case. > > All feedback is welcome. I meant to work on this last week but got distracted. I have a bunch of build changes testing locally but need to make some cross compilers. I don't think we will be moving to 5 very soon. I have nothing against it but Mike might be a harder sell. I want USE deps so I'm going to do 2 at least, then get the prefix guys on board for 3. Like I said on the bug I don't think we want to do a new eclass (or if we did I would make a toolchain-next for masked versions and backport stuff). -- Ryan Hill psn: dirtyepic_sk gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org 47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
