On 21 April 2013 20:49, viv...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Samuli,
> while you're at it do you know what changed between 1.5 and 1.6 in
> ICC/color profiles land?
>
> In short digikam is now unable to save png files, I've yet do debug it
> so if there is some pointers that could shorten the discovery.
Sorry for bringing back this thread from the dead, but...
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:09:47 +
Markos Chandras wrote:
> If there is at least one Gentoo developer in metadata.xml we assume
> the package is properly maintained by him so
> we never touch it.
Does this include herd ?
For ml stuff, I
On 22 April 2013 10:21, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> Sorry for bringing back this thread from the dead, but...
>
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:09:47 +
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>> If there is at least one Gentoo developer in metadata.xml we assume
>> the package is properly maintained by him so
>> we n
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:25:48 +0100
Markos Chandras wrote:
> >
> > Now, these packages have proxy-maint as co-herd, and I'd prefer
> > people that are not familiar with ml (ebuilds have their set of
> > specificities) not to blindly commit packages because it's
> > proxy-maintained.
>
> I made it
Hi!
Since we probably will have to fix the files coming out of
tarballs until the various upstreams have fixed them, I propose
running a PNG fixer during or after the install phase. Since
having pngcrush as dep for everything is not exactly lightweight,
I hacked together a PNG file fixer in pure(
On 21 April 2013 22:38, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Denis Dupeyron schrieb:
> > I'm hoping this kind of immature and abrasive behaviours will not
> > propagate (notice the plural here). Yes, when you see a package being
> > actively maintained by somebody else you should absolutely not t
On 21 April 2013 22:59, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 20:53:28 +0800
> Ben de Groot wrote:
>
> > On 19 April 2013 21:30, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 09:16:32 + (UTC)
> > > "Ben de Groot (yngwin)" wrote:
> > >
> > > > Index: package.mask
> > > > ===
On 21 April 2013 23:05, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 20:53:28 +0800
> Ben de Groot wrote:
> > >
> > > PS: btw, some hunks are weird in your commit, a locale issue ?
> > >
> >
> > No, just a line in my vimrc that removes trailing whitespace.
> >
>
> You should probably disable it o
On 21 April 2013 22:11, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> I'm hoping this kind of immature and abrasive behaviours will not
> propagate (notice the plural here).
>
I'm not sure exactly which behaviours you're calling immature and abrasive,
but it seems to me you're overreacting again. Please stay out if t
On 22 April 2013 03:43, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to give you a heads up and explanation on what I'm doing
> today.
>
> I'm in the process of converting emul-linux-x86-xlibs dependencies
> in gx86 with any-of dependencies supporting both emul-linux and split
> multilib packages.
>
>
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:00:38 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 21 April 2013 23:05, Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 20:53:28 +0800
> > Ben de Groot wrote:
> > > >
> > > > PS: btw, some hunks are weird in your commit, a locale issue ?
> > > >
> > >
> > > No, just a line in my vimrc
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:21:55 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> It should come as no surprise that I am not happy with this. While I
> applaud your efforts to attempt to improve the multilib situation, I
> don't think we are quite at the stage yet where this can be pushed as
> the default choice, as you
On 22 April 2013 21:51, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:21:55 +0800
> Ben de Groot wrote:
> > It should come as no surprise that I am not happy with this. While I
> > applaud your efforts to attempt to improve the multilib situation, I
> > don't think we are quite at the stage yet
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:56:49 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> I agree it is broken. I'm trying to do my part for the packages I
> maintain. In my opinion all the recent multilib stuff should be
> masked, but I don't maintain those other (x11) packages. So you may
> want to handle it in a different way.
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 22 April 2013 03:43, Michał Górny wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to give you a heads up and explanation on what I'm doing
>> today.
>>
>> I'm in the process of converting emul-linux-x86-xlibs dependencies
>> in gx86 with any-of dependenci
On 22 April 2013 23:38, Matt Turner wrote:
> Do I assume correctly that this is a response to the freetype and
> fontconfig multilib bugs?
>
This thread is not directly about that, but it is related.
I'm not convinced that this multilib solution is mature enough to be
pushed so speedily into th
El mar, 23-04-2013 a las 01:03 +0800, Ben de Groot escribió:
> On 22 April 2013 23:38, Matt Turner wrote:
> Do I assume correctly that this is a response to the freetype
> and
> fontconfig multilib bugs?
>
>
> This thread is not directly about that, but it is related.
>
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:43:22 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 21 April 2013 22:38, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
> wrote:
>
> > Denis Dupeyron schrieb:
> > > I'm hoping this kind of immature and abrasive behaviours will not
> > > propagate (notice the plural here). Yes, when you see a package bein
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:21:55 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 22 April 2013 03:43, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > The common kind of committed dep now looks like:
> >
> > || (
> > (
> > x11-libs/libXfoo[abi_x86_32]
> > x11-libs/libXbar[abi_x86_32]
> > )
> > app-emulation/emul
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 22 April 2013 23:38, Matt Turner wrote:
>>
>> Do I assume correctly that this is a response to the freetype and
>> fontconfig multilib bugs?
>
>
> This thread is not directly about that, but it is related.
>
> I'm not convinced that this
Alexis Ballier posted on Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:40:33 +0200 as excerpted:
> "Having functional changes mixed with whitespace/cosmetics in a single
> commit makes it hard to read and understand."
>
>> Also, in this case I see only one extra hunk.
>> But once we have proper tools (like git) we can re
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:56:49 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> > I suppose you talked with Michal about this and couldn't reach an
> > agreement, like him joining the fonts herd, or at least the mail alias
> > to monitor ft/fc bugs.
> >
> > If you want I can join the fonts herd also, I already have a f
20.04.2013 22:02, Mikle Kolyada пишет:
> Lately, i saw many bugs like =dev-perl/
> ${packagename}: fails test. Me just interested proper way to fix those
> bugs? Sure, it's good when we have clear version for bump w/o problem.
> But this is not always What common ways to fix those bugs? (I know
23 matches
Mail list logo
