On 12/17/12 2:25 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:09:08PM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 12/17/12 11:40 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
So systemd still works with a separate /usr and you're continuing to
spread misinformation. Demonstrating such behaviour while complaining
about the b
viv...@gmail.com posted on Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:37:49 +0100 as excerpted:
> Some numbers:
>
> Packages installed: 1756
> Packages in world:626
> Packages in system: 42
> Required packages:1756
> Number to remove: 0
Heh... try my depclean summary (this is from my workstation, but t
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2012, William Hubbs wrote:
> This all started with the April 2012 council meeting when it was
> pushed through that separate /usr without an initramfs is a
> supported configuration, so yes, the previous council started this
> issue.
Sorry, but that's not an accurate account
On Mon, December 17, 2012 22:31, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:03:40PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> Olav Vitters wrote:
>>
>> >On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:29:26AM -0500, Richard Yao wrote:
>> >> As I said in an earlier email, Lennart Poettering claims that it does
>> >> not work. We
On 12/17/2012 09:59 PM, Duncan wrote:
> viv...@gmail.com posted on Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:37:49 +0100 as excerpted:
>
>> Some numbers:
>>
>> Packages installed: 1756
>> Packages in world:626
>> Packages in system: 42
>> Required packages:1756
>> Number to remove: 0
>
> Heh... try my
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. posted on Mon, 17 Dec 2012 08:48:01 -0800 as excerpted:
> On 12/17/12 7:32 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>> So what should I teach? Here's what I've got off the top of my head:
>> Please comment. If it gets systematized enough, it can be a guide to
>> future devs too. Everythin
101 - 106 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
