On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:16:05 +0200
> Corentin Chary wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Michał Górny
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:11 +
>> > "Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:50:49PM +02
On 04/26/2012 12:30 AM, Corentin Chary wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:16:05 +0200
>> Corentin Chary wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Michał Górny
>>> wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:11 +
"Robin H. Johnson" wro
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 04/26/2012 12:30 AM, Corentin Chary wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:16:05 +0200
>>> Corentin Chary wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Michał Górny
wrote:
> On
On 04/26/2012 01:03 AM, Corentin Chary wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 04/26/2012 12:30 AM, Corentin Chary wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:16:05 +0200
Corentin Chary wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 04/26/2012 01:03 AM, Corentin Chary wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
>>> On 04/26/2012 12:30 AM, Corentin Chary wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:16:05
Zac Medico posted on Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:26:24 -0700 as excerpted:
> On 04/25/2012 11:18 PM, Duncan wrote:
>> IOW, let's quit letting the perfect be the enemy of the good, and just
>> get on with it, already.
>
> If that means settling on something that's fragile and prone to lots of
> bug report
Hi all,
Just a heads up, lu_zero has discovered that the eselect git
repository contains some commits with invalid author lines. This is a
holdover from the conversion from svn to git (basically, the real name
is missing for devs who changed their Gentoo username). I'm going to
fix this within the
# Stratos Psomadakis (26 Apr 2012)
# No longer maintained.
# Masked for removal in 30 days wrt #412189
sys-kernel/mm-sources
--
Stratos Psomadakis
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 04/26/2012 02:55 AM, Duncan wrote:
Zac Medico posted on Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:26:24 -0700 as excerpted:
On 04/25/2012 11:18 PM, Duncan wrote:
IOW, let's quit letting the perfect be the enemy of the good, and just
get on with it, already.
If that means settling on something that's fragile an
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:04:08 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> Arg, no. Please just print the warning if the host doesn't do SSE2.
> There's no reason to have a USE flag here (and _really_ no reason to
> make it fatal)
I entirely agree there. :)
> , especially for an instruction set that every system h
On 04/26/12 at 06:00PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:04:08 -0600
> Ryan Hill wrote:
>
> > Arg, no. Please just print the warning if the host doesn't do SSE2.
> > There's no reason to have a USE flag here (and _really_ no reason to
> > make it fatal)
>
> I entirely agree
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 06:18:32 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> My suggestion is therefore to do the simple thing, just apply any
> patches found in the patches dir, and punt on the complicated
> do-we-eautoreconf- or-not thing.
Agreed. Just make sure the feature will be only used
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:21:36 +0200
Corentin Chary wrote:
> Second solution:
> github http://cloud.github.com/downloads
> github-bad-uris -http://github.com/downloads/
-https://github.com/downloads/
>
> The good thing with the first one is that it would allow repoman to
> outputs something like "
On 04/26/2012 11:27 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 06:18:32 + (UTC)
> Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> My suggestion is therefore to do the simple thing, just apply any
>> patches found in the patches dir, and punt on the complicated
>> do-we-eautoreconf- or-not thing.
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:43:37 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 04/26/2012 11:27 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 06:18:32 + (UTC)
> > Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> >
> >> My suggestion is therefore to do the simple thing, just apply any
> >> patches found in the patches di
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:50:02 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> > So the package manager is supposed to interact with an eclass
> > function? That's pretty ugly. Why not just roll out a quick EAPI 5
> > that adds support for the "apply_user_patches_here" approach [1]?
> >
> > http://archives.gentoo.org/
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> I haven't followed the prev. conversation but what's wrong with a USE flag for
> SSE2? We already have SSE2 flags, even global..
That's not it. The flash binary uses SSE2 instructions without
checking for their presence, which causes bad
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:15:34 -0400
Matt Turner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Christian Ruppert
> wrote:
> > I haven't followed the prev. conversation but what's wrong with a
> > USE flag for SSE2? We already have SSE2 flags, even global..
>
> That's not it. The flash binary uses SSE
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> wouldnt adding a sse2 useflag and putting it in REQUIRED_USE solve the
> problem ?
>
> afaik portage wont even try to upgrade if people have -sse2
If that works, which I think it will, that does sound like the best thing to do.
Dear all,
I'd like to suggest we introduce the following very useful feature, as soon as
possible (which likely means in the next EAPI?):
* two new files in profile directories supported, package.use.stable.mask and
package.use.stable.force
* syntax is identical to package.use.mask and packag
Zac Medico posted on Thu, 26 Apr 2012 08:21:02 -0700 as excerpted:
> On 04/26/2012 02:55 AM, Duncan wrote:
>> Zac Medico posted on Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:26:24 -0700 as excerpted:
>>
>>> On 04/25/2012 11:18 PM, Duncan wrote:
IOW, let's quit letting the perfect be the enemy of the good
>>> If th
On Thursday 26 April 2012 18:03:54 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> * two new files in profile directories supported, package.use.stable.mask
> and package.use.stable.force
> * syntax is identical to package.use.mask and package.use.force
> * meaning is identical to package.use.mask and package.use.forc
On 04/26/2012 03:08 PM, Duncan wrote:
Zac Medico posted on Thu, 26 Apr 2012 08:21:02 -0700 as excerpted:
Also, don't forget to consider the possibility of interference between
FEATURES=userpatch and epatch_user (applying same patches twice).
The existing phaselock-file solution should continue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/26/2012 06:03 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> I'd like to suggest we introduce the following very useful
> feature, as soon as possible (which likely means in the next
> EAPI?):
>
> * two new files in profile directories supported,
> package.
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:06:45 -0300
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:15:34 -0400
> Matt Turner wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Christian Ruppert
> > wrote:
> > > I haven't followed the prev. conversation but what's wrong with a
> > > USE flag for SSE2? We already hav
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:00:04 +0200
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:04:08 -0600
> Ryan Hill wrote:
>
> > especially for an instruction set that every system has supported
> > for over a decade.
>
> Er, some of my teenage systems run desktops just fine here, thanks. And
> one of t
On Friday 27 April 2012 00:43:15 Jonathan Callen wrote:
> On 04/26/2012 06:03 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > I'd like to suggest we introduce the following very useful
> > feature, as soon as possible (which likely means in the next
> > EAPI?):
> >
> > * two new files in profile directories sup
On 04/26/2012 11:28 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 27 April 2012 00:43:15 Jonathan Callen wrote:
>> On 04/26/2012 06:03 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>>> I'd like to suggest we introduce the following very useful
>>> feature, as soon as possible (which likely means in the next
>>> EAPI?):
>>
28 matches
Mail list logo
