On 04/26/2012 01:03 AM, Corentin Chary wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Zac Medico <zmed...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> On 04/26/2012 12:30 AM, Corentin Chary wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>>> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:16:05 +0200 >>>> Corentin Chary <corentin.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:11 +0000 >>>>>> "Robin H. Johnson" <robb...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:50:49PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: >>>>>>>>>> $ ./mirrors.py --all --count >>>>>>>>>> 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net >>>>>>>>>> 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net/get >>>>>>>>>> 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net >>>>>>>>>> 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net/get >>>>>>>>> These are already mirror bouncers. If you visit the above, >>>>>>>>> you'll get the closest mirror for downloading. >>>>>>>> And since there is already ~10 "mirrors" with only one actual >>>>>>>> backend, should they go to thirdpartymirrors or not ? If not, >>>>>>>> what about this pseudo-mirrors already present in >>>>>>>> thirdpartymirrors ? >>>>>>> I think we should add the pseudo-mirrors, but explicitly mark them >>>>>>> as such in the file, so that they don't get duplicate entries >>>>>>> added (eg adding us.pear, de.pear and the pear bouncer is bad. >>>>>>> Should have just the bouncer). >>>>>> >>>>>> It'd be great if we could add some kind of additional mirror >>>>>> entries, which would be used by repoman to signal missing mirror:// >>>>>> entries but won't be used for downloads. >>>>> >>>>> Yep, we could put that in it too: >>>>> github http://github.com/downloads/ >>>>> https://github.com/downloads/ >>>> >>>> Per spec, portage can choose a random mirror of the list. If we put >>>> entries like that, these two will be equally possible as the preferred >>>> cloud. URL -- while they redirect one to another. >>>> >>>> We might decide on some common syntax like preceding all extra entries >>>> with '-' but I don't want to be the one deciding here. >>> >>> I checked, and current portage code already handle entries starting >>> with a - gracefully thanks to stack_dictlist (removing them from the >>> list of mirrors). >> >> That means repoman will ignore them too. If you want existing versions >> of repoman to check for those paths in SRC_URI, you can add a line like >> this to thirdpartymirrors: >> >> github-bad-urls http://github.com/downloads/ https://github.com/downloads/ > > Hum, I checked repoman source code, and I didn't find where it checks > if SRC_URI matches something in thirdpartymirror. Any hint ?
Search for SRC_URI.mirror in /usr/bin/repoman. -- Thanks, Zac
