[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/cdparanoia: ChangeLog cdparanoia-3.10.2-r3.ebuild

2011-10-23 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 10/23/2011 03:00 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote: > scarabeus11/10/23 12:00:55 > > Modified: ChangeLog cdparanoia-3.10.2-r3.ebuild > Log: > Bump to eapi4 and punt static libs. Time to revert this commit as I don't see anything in the ebuild that disables building the

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/yajl: yajl-2.0.2.ebuild ChangeLog

2011-10-23 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 10/23/2011 03:03 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote: > scarabeus11/10/23 12:03:00 > > Modified: yajl-2.0.2.ebuild ChangeLog > Log: > Make static libs optional Requires reverting too, as it's still building the static archives, effectively hiding the problem instead of so

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/cdparanoia: ChangeLog cdparanoia-3.10.2-r3.ebuild

2011-10-23 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 10/23/2011 03:00 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote: >> scarabeus    11/10/23 12:00:55 >> >>   Modified:             ChangeLog cdparanoia-3.10.2-r3.ebuild >>   Log: >>   Bump to eapi4 and punt static libs. > > Time to revert this commit

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/cdparanoia: ChangeLog cdparanoia-3.10.2-r3.ebuild

2011-10-23 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 10/23/2011 04:27 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> On 10/23/2011 03:00 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote: >>> scarabeus11/10/23 12:00:55 >>> >>> Modified: ChangeLog cdparanoia-3.10.2-r3.ebuild >>> Log: >>> Bump to eapi4

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/cdparanoia: ChangeLog cdparanoia-3.10.2-r3.ebuild

2011-10-23 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
On Sonntag 23 Oktober 2011 15:34:30 Samuli Suominen wrote: > If you only wanted to remove these files, you are free to use > INSTALL_MASK locally instead of downgrading the quality of tree. > > Do you have any idea how much time me, and aballier spent to make > cdparanoia's build system as clean

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/cdparanoia: ChangeLog cdparanoia-3.10.2-r3.ebuild

2011-10-23 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > > If you only wanted to remove these files, you are free to use > INSTALL_MASK locally instead of downgrading the quality of tree. How is this a quality issue? Why do we have a static-libs USE flag is packages can't use it to determine wh

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/cdparanoia: ChangeLog cdparanoia-3.10.2-r3.ebuild

2011-10-23 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2011/10/23 Samuli Suominen : > On 10/23/2011 04:27 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Samuli Suominen >> wrote: >>> On 10/23/2011 03:00 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote: scarabeus    11/10/23 12:00:55   Modified:             ChangeLog cdparanoia-3.10.2-r

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/cdparanoia: ChangeLog cdparanoia-3.10.2-r3.ebuild

2011-10-23 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 10/23/2011 04:57 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> >> If you only wanted to remove these files, you are free to use >> INSTALL_MASK locally instead of downgrading the quality of tree. > > How is this a quality issue? Why do we have a static-l

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/cdparanoia: ChangeLog cdparanoia-3.10.2-r3.ebuild

2011-10-23 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 10/23/2011 05:01 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > 2011/10/23 Samuli Suominen : >> On 10/23/2011 04:27 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Samuli Suominen >>> wrote: On 10/23/2011 03:00 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote: > scarabeus11/10/23 12:00:55 > >

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/cdparanoia: ChangeLog cdparanoia-3.10.2-r3.ebuild

2011-10-23 Thread Duncan
Andreas K. Huettel posted on Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:50:04 +0200 as excerpted: > I'd like to get my standards up to speed, so may I respectfully ask- > what is, > apart from link time, the Gentoo-user-visible difference between * > removing the .a files in the ebuild * and not building them in the fir

[gentoo-dev] Building hardened gcc specs always, just not enabling them by default

2011-10-23 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
Looks like the thread I started about moving more hardened features to default got a lot of positive feedback. Kernel hardening features are more problematic, but hardening the toolchain seems to be within reach. I'd

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH scons-utils] Support setting common SCons arguments using myesconsargs.

2011-10-23 Thread Michał Górny
--- scons-utils.eclass | 33 + 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/scons-utils.eclass b/scons-utils.eclass index a87b6e6..16fda7a 100644 --- a/scons-utils.eclass +++ b/scons-utils.eclass @@ -14,11 +14,21 @@ # @CODE # inherit scons-uti

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building hardened gcc specs always, just not enabling them by default

2011-10-23 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 10/23/2011 02:00 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > Looks like the thread I started about moving more hardened features to > default > > got a lot of positive feedback. Kernel hardening features are more > problematic

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building hardened gcc specs always, just not enabling them by default

2011-10-23 Thread Alexandre Rostovtsev
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > Where would the hardened profiles fit in this?   This requires some > thought.  Right now "hardened" means three choices: 1) hardened > toolchain, 2) hardened-sources kernel, 3) hardened profile.  Some > packages are masked or added to th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building hardened gcc specs always, just not enabling them by default

2011-10-23 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 10/23/2011 03:20 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Anthony G. Basile > wrote: >> Where would the hardened profiles fit in this? This requires some >> thought. Right now "hardened" means three choices: 1) hardened >> toolchain, 2) hardened-sources kernel, 3)

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2011-10-23 23h59 UTC

2011-10-23 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2011-10-23 23h59 UTC. Removals: kde-misc/kcm_gtk2011-10-17 20:12:46 dilfridge dev-games/cel 2011-10-19 16:10:29 ssuominen net-ftp/ftpc

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH scons-utils] Support setting common SCons arguments using myesconsargs.

2011-10-23 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 08:20:37PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote: > --- > scons-utils.eclass | 33 + > 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) ... > +# @ECLASS-VARIABLE: myesconsargs > +# @DEFAULT_UNSET > +# @DESCRIPTION: > +# List of package-specific opti

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building hardened gcc specs always, just not enabling them by default

2011-10-23 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 10/23/11 9:47 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > So if you look in the hardened profiles, you'll see some things masked > like net-im/skype because of the kernel, and some things masked like > =sys-devel/gdb-7.0* because of the toolchain. If the hardened toolchain > moves into mainstream, then we'l