On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Samuli Suominen <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 10/23/2011 03:00 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
>> scarabeus    11/10/23 12:00:55
>>
>>   Modified:             ChangeLog cdparanoia-3.10.2-r3.ebuild
>>   Log:
>>   Bump to eapi4 and punt static libs.
>
> Time to revert this commit as I don't see anything in the ebuild that
> disables building the static archives at compile phase.
>
> This is same as hiding the problem, not solving it. Not the way we do
> things at sound@.
>
>> +     use static-libs || find "${ED}" -name '*.a' -exec rm -f {} +

Doesn't reverting this seem a bit like shooting yourself in the foot
to remove an ingrown toenail?

Unless I'm missing something this DOES get rid of the unneeded
archives.  Now, sure, you'd save a few milliseconds of CPU if they
weren't built in the first place.  However, you're proposing replacing
an ebuild that builds but doesn't install undesired files with one
that builds them AND installs them (since the hypothetical ebuild that
does neither doesn't exist yet).

Perfection shouldn't hold us back from improvement.  By all means open
up a bug asking for the next level of improvement if it really bothers
people.

Now, if there is some subtle issue that causes issues during build if
the files are there and only removed at the last minute then clearly
that is a bigger problem.

Rich

Reply via email to