Le 31/07/11 à 04:40, Samuli a tapoté :
> > If there's any option that allows the use of a separate /usr
> > partition without an initramfs, then let's explore it. I don't feel
> > like having to use an initramfs just because I want a small /
> > without /usr on it.
>
> The message is really missin
On 07/31/2011 10:20 AM, netfab wrote:
> Le 31/07/11 à 04:40, Samuli a tapoté :
>>> If there's any option that allows the use of a separate /usr
>>> partition without an initramfs, then let's explore it. I don't feel
>>> like having to use an initramfs just because I want a small /
>>> without /usr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 04:40:33 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >> Can we discuss both options?
> > If there's any option that allows the use of a separate /usr
> > partition without an initramfs, then let's explore it. I don't feel
> > like having to us
Le 31/07/11 à 11:15, Samuli a tapoté :
> > System reactivity. I have an old setup with multiple partitions on
> > multiple hard-drives mounted on multiple system directories.
>
> And why is both using an initramfs [...] an problem?
>
No problem for me. If I have to do it, I will. In fact I alrea
On 07/31/2011 04:56 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 04:40:33AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> On 07/31/2011 03:59 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>>> On 30-07-2011 22:17, William Hubbs wrote:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:27:27AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Sinc
Just as a reminder - you can't break the stable tree by removing
ebuilds even if there's a big scary security bug.
I restored the latest stable ebuild until the arch teams do their
thing for bug #377143
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 05:29:52 -0400
Michael Sterrett wrote:
> Just as a reminder - you can't break the stable tree by removing
> ebuilds even if there's a big scary security bug.
Well it wasn't done on purpose.
> I restored the latest stable ebuild until the arch teams do their
> thing for bu
W dniu 30.07.2011 15:55, Samuli Suominen pisze:
> On 07/30/2011 01:46 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:27:27 +0300
>> Samuli Suominen wrote:
>>> Since running separate /usr without mounting it from initramfs on top
>>> of / before init is and has been broken with udev for a lon
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 16:55:23 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> I dislike the IUSE="+static" some packages are currently doing to
> workaround this, instead of moving the needed shared libs to /
>
> I dislike the idea of pciutils and usbutils database(s) in
> non-standard location in / to keep udev
Hi everyone,
A couple of days ago, bonsaikitten (Patrick), kerframil (Kerin Millar)
and myself were talking about other distros moving away from setuid
binaries towards caps. Openwall and Fedora are now setuid-less [1].
Some googling showed that Constanze has done quite a bit of work in the
area
Hello, all.
The last discussion on new solutions optional runtime depends lead to no
agreement. Thus, I'd like to propose a solution extending the usability
of current methods of handling them.
My idea is to create an eclass which would take a optional dependency
list (e.g. through some kind of S
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 17:27:21 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> My idea is to create an eclass which would take a optional dependency
> list (e.g. through some kind of SDEPEND variable or so [being a bash
> array!]) and print it out to user in pkg_postinst().
Please don't. This should be worked out and
On 07/22/2011 03:11 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> Hello fellow devs,
> [snip]
Yey i'm number two :D
On 7/31/11 8:27 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> The last discussion on new solutions optional runtime depends lead to no
> agreement. Thus, I'd like to propose a solution extending the usability
> of current methods of handling them.
I'm interested in some sort of suggested/recommend deps for
www-client
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> A couple of days ago, bonsaikitten (Patrick), kerframil (Kerin Millar)
> and myself were talking about other distros moving away from setuid
> binaries towards caps. Openwall and Fedora are now setuid-less [1].
> Some go
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Raúl Porcel wrote:
> On 07/22/2011 03:11 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>> Hello fellow devs,
>> [snip]
>
> Yey i'm number two :D
>
You're a bot, you don't count. ;)
--
~Nirbheek Chauhan
Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team
On 07/31/2011 03:46 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Anthony G. Basile
> wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> A couple of days ago, bonsaikitten (Patrick), kerframil (Kerin Millar)
>> and myself were talking about other distros moving away from setuid
>> binaries towards cap
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 01:16:21 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Anthony G. Basile
> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > A couple of days ago, bonsaikitten (Patrick), kerframil (Kerin
> > Millar) and myself were talking about other distros moving away
> > from setuid bina
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:28:35 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> Will packages always explicitly set caps themselves or will sometimes
> upstream do that for us?
I've no doubt some upstreams will try... But userpriv should stop most
of the damage.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP sig
On 30 July 2011 08:27, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Since running separate /usr without mounting it from initramfs on top of
> / before init is and has been broken with udev for a long time now[1][2][3]
>
> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364235
> [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2011-07-31 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-lang/ekopath-bin2011-07-25 18:27:17 xarthisius
x11-themes/mythtv-themes-extra 2011-07-28 21:02:05 cardoe
media-plugins/
21 matches
Mail list logo
