W dniu 30.07.2011 15:55, Samuli Suominen pisze: > On 07/30/2011 01:46 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:27:27 +0300 >> Samuli Suominen <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> Since running separate /usr without mounting it from initramfs on top >>> of / before init is and has been broken with udev for a long time >>> now[1][2][3] >>> >>> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364235 >>> [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove#Move_all_to_.2Fusr >>> [3] >>> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken >>> >>> Can we warn users about not doing the separate /usr mistake in the >>> handbook? >> >> It's important to consider the timeline here. Separate /usr was >> accidentally broken by a sudden increase in dependencies from base >> system packages to desktopy things. It was only later that certain >> people decided that "oh, separate /usr is a bad idea anyway", and they >> did so because they couldn't figure out how to fix the mess they'd >> caused. This is very much a case of carelessly letting the horse escape >> and then trying to convince everyone that no-one needs a horse anyway... >> > > Someone mentioned NFS mount on /usr. Do we have other reasons? How > many users that might be?
That covers headless/diskless clusters and I suspect many people still do that. Cheers, Kacper
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
