On Tuesday 27 October 2009 02:07:02 Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:48:39 +0200 Petteri Räty wrote:
> > James Cloos wrote:
> > > When you first psoted this list I noticed some (or several?) live
> > > ebuilds. Git- is the one I remember.
> > >
> > > Those should not get nuked during
* Torsten Veller:
> After that I'll minimize my perl work if no more people join to help.
Plan revised: I stop doing perl work right now.
Thanks
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 October 2009 07:34:18 Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 20 October 2009 09:06:29 Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
As I'm building the toolchain myself too, I configure it with the
32bit host triplet on each platform,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Torsten Veller wrote:
> * Torsten Veller:
> > After that I'll minimize my perl work if no more people join to help.
>
> Plan revised: I stop doing perl work right now.
>
> Thanks
>
>
Sorry to see you go.
Thanks for all that you have done so far anyway, its great
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 11:10:39 Torsten Veller wrote:
> * Torsten Veller:
> > After that I'll minimize my perl work if no more people join to help.
>
> Plan revised: I stop doing perl work right now.
>
Thanks for all the time you spent on perl.
I can understand that doing everything by you
Joe Sapp (nixphoeni) wrote:
> nixphoeni09/10/27 11:21:25
>
> Log:
> Directory /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/x11-plugins/desklet-Mouse added to the
> repository
>
Since when did we start adding "big letters" to other than perl -categories?
*Very* ugly.
Torsten Veller wrote:
> * Torsten Veller:
>> After that I'll minimize my perl work if no more people join to help.
>
> Plan revised: I stop doing perl work right now.
>
> Thanks
>
>
I am also sorry to see you stop. You have gotten a lot accomplished in a
short period of time and it was a joy t
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 October 2009 02:07:02 Ryan Hill wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:48:39 +0200 Petteri Räty wrote:
>>> James Cloos wrote:
When you first psoted this list I noticed some (or several?) live
ebuilds. Git- is the one I remember.
Those should
James Cloos wrote:
>> "Petteri" == Petteri Räty writes:
>
> Petteri> Their maintainers should be active and switch their ebuilds to
> Petteri> EAPI 2. If they don't have an active maintainer, then do we
> Petteri> want to keep live ebuilds for them around?
>
> What possible benefit could be
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 09:09:48 Petteri Räty wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 October 2009 02:07:02 Ryan Hill wrote:
> >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:48:39 +0200 Petteri Räty wrote:
> >>> James Cloos wrote:
> When you first psoted this list I noticed some (or several?) live
> >>
Rémi Cardona wrote:
Le 26/10/2009 22:58, Richard Freeman a écrit :
Gentoo is about choice.
No it isn't. Gentoo is about empowering users, giving them the ability
and tools to _change_ the distro to _their_ needs.
Gentoo does _not_ cater to all the possible needs.
This is somewhat off-topic
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:07:08PM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote:
> R??mi Cardona wrote:
> > Le 26/10/2009 22:58, Richard Freeman a ??crit :
> >> Gentoo is about choice.
> >
> > No it isn't. Gentoo is about empowering users, giving them the ability
> > and tools to _change_ the distro to _their_ n
William Hubbs schrieb:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:07:08PM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote:
>> R??mi Cardona wrote:
>>> Le 26/10/2009 22:58, Richard Freeman a ??crit :
Gentoo is about choice.
>>> No it isn't. Gentoo is about empowering users, giving them the ability
>>> and tools to _change_ th
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:43:52PM +0100, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> William Hubbs schrieb:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:07:08PM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote:
> >> R??mi Cardona wrote:
> >>> Le 26/10/2009 22:58, Richard Freeman a ??crit :
> Gentoo is about choice.
> >>> No it isn't. Gentoo is ab
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:29 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> I just tested this, and make.conf overrides iuse defaults. To verify
> this for yourself, pick a package with an iuse default turning on a
> flag, then turn off the flag in make.conf and check what would happen if
> you emerged the package.
Brian Harring wrote:
> The proposal is pretty simple; if code modifies the vdb in any
> fashion, it needs to update the mtime on a file named
> '.modification_time' in the root of the vdb.
I'd to prefer using the mtime of the /var/db/pkg directory itself,
since existence of a '.modification_time
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:37:38PM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:29 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > I just tested this, and make.conf overrides iuse defaults. ??To verify
> > this for yourself, pick a package with an iuse default turning on a
> > flag, then turn off the
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 October 2009 09:09:48 Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 27 October 2009 02:07:02 Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:48:39 +0200 Petteri Räty wrote:
> James Cloos wrote:
>> When you first psoted this list I noticed som
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 14:46:31 Petteri Räty wrote:
> Normally old versions are not kept around as already said if you read
> the thread.
"normal" is not the same thing as "always". unless you're the maintainer, you
have no idea whether old versions are kept there on purpose. ive had people
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:32:30AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > The proposal is pretty simple; if code modifies the vdb in any
> > fashion, it needs to update the mtime on a file named
> > '.modification_time' in the root of the vdb.
>
> I'd to prefer using the mtime of th
20 matches
Mail list logo
