On Tuesday 27 October 2009 14:46:31 Petteri Räty wrote: > Normally old versions are not kept around as already said if you read > the thread.
"normal" is not the same thing as "always". unless you're the maintainer, you have no idea whether old versions are kept there on purpose. ive had people delete older versions of packages on me simply because they made this invalid assumption without talking to the maintainer. the rest of the thread is irrelevant as this point was not made. a quick check of your list shows wine/uclibc shouldnt be blindly culled. > Live ebuilds shouldn't really have been in the original list > with my intended logic. For them I will usually just migrate them to > EAPI 2 like with other packages we have been touching. OK > Using a tracker bug makes sense if you expect some action from individual > maintainers which is not the case here as they can just leave the job to > people nuking built_with_use like me. i dont plan on fixing my ebuilds soonish since this isnt a terribly important issue, but they'll get fixed at some point -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
