eselect-1.2_rc1 is now in the tree.
This version contains relatively large changes for better support of
Gentoo Prefix [1], which I think will justify a pretest. Therefore it
will stay in package.mask for one or two weeks.
Other notable changes are:
- The "basename" and "dirname" functions hav
Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Le 18/08/2009 03:30, Steven J Long a écrit :
> [snip]
>
> Steven,
>
> This thread was dead for more than 4 days. Yet you pick it up and you
> try to pick a fight with Ciaran.
>
No I was answering the points he made, specifically he gave the fact that
something's not used in
Steven J Long wrote:
> Rémi Cardona wrote:
>
>
>> Le 18/08/2009 03:30, Steven J Long a écrit :
>> [snip]
>>
>> Steven,
>>
>> This thread was dead for more than 4 days. Yet you pick it up and you
>> try to pick a fight with Ciaran.
>>
>>
> No I was answering the points he made, specifically
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:13:59 -0400
Andrew D Kirch wrote:
> I think it's clear at this point that Ciaran was the wrong person to
> have in charge of the PMS or EAPI spec's despite his willingness to do
> the work.. I tried to talk to him about having Paludis support an
> extension of PMS which Por
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:13:59 -0400
> Andrew D Kirch wrote:
>
>
> > I look forward to seeing Funtoo's creation of EAPI funtoo-2.
>
Obviously you don't get it. We aren't going to spend time writing this
sort of spurious and unnecessary specification documents. The f
On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 15:28 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> I find it very hard to commit thesedays since tree is full of
> DEPEND.bad's from selinux profiles (existing ones that I didn't create).
>
> I vote for marking these profiles as dev, instead of stable since that's
> what they seem to be.
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:36:30 -0400
Andrew D Kirch wrote:
> > > I look forward to seeing Funtoo's creation of EAPI funtoo-2.
>
> Obviously you don't get it. We aren't going to spend time writing
> this sort of spurious and unnecessary specification documents.
Why not? Are you saying you don't wa
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> I look forward to seeing Funtoo's creation of EAPI funtoo-2.
>
Well judging by your EAPI-2, I'd prefer it. Apart from USE-deps, there's
been no discussion apart from under your supervision on bugzie.
nonfatal? (or w/e it's called.) Who came up with that idea, and why did
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Steven J
Long wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
>> I look forward to seeing Funtoo's creation of EAPI funtoo-2.
>>
> Well judging by your EAPI-2, I'd prefer it. Apart from USE-deps, there's
> been no discussion apart from under your supervision on bugzie.
> nonfatal
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:02:23 +0100
Steven J Long wrote:
> Rémi Cardona wrote:
>
> > Le 18/08/2009 03:30, Steven J Long a écrit :
> > [snip]
> >
> > Steven,
> >
> > This thread was dead for more than 4 days. Yet you pick it up and you
> > try to pick a fight with Ciaran.
> >
> No I was answerin
On Tuesday 11 August 2009 18:26:04 Ben de Groot wrote:
> Mark Loeser wrote:
> > Why can't this be on our official overlays? Is there a technical
> > reason, because we seem to just be spreading things out even more than
> > necessary.
>
> Because on g.o.g.o. we can not admin it ourselves, resultin
11 matches
Mail list logo
