Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2

2008-09-14 Thread Carsten Lohrke
On Dienstag, 9. September 2008, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > ~ * The meaning of the !atom blocker syntax now implies that > ~ temporary simultaneous installation of conflicting packages is > ~ allowed [3]. > > ~ * A new !!atom blocker syntax is now supported, for use in special > ~ cas

[gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI-2

2008-09-14 Thread Duncan
Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 14 Sep 2008 16:21:03 +0200: > What I do strongly oppose is changing the meaning of the '!' symbol, as > blockers, which should remain real blockers will not be adjusted by us, > when changing an ebuild to EAPI 2

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2

2008-09-14 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Carsten Lohrke wrote: > On Dienstag, 9. September 2008, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: >> ~ * The meaning of the !atom blocker syntax now implies that >> ~ temporary simultaneous installation of conflicting packages is >> ~ allowed [3]. >> >> ~

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: app-editors/ted

2008-09-14 Thread Harald van Dijk
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:17:12PM -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote: > # Jeremy Olexa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (13 Sep 2008) > # Masked for removal in 60 days. Multiple issues, broke for some people. > Needs > # maintainer. automagic deps. See bug #154997 > app-editors/ted I've fixed the build and marked mys

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Glep 55 use case: moving slot to file name

2008-09-14 Thread Steve Long
Petteri Räty wrote: > Icedtea has two release tracks. One for the 1.7 OpenJDK code base and > one for the 1.6 code base. They have independent version numbering so > they can have collisions. By moving the slot to the file name we could > have icedtea-1.2:1.6.ebuildN and icedtea-1.2:1.7.ebuildN. T

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2

2008-09-14 Thread David Leverton
On Thursday 11 September 2008 21:06:48 Doug Goldstein wrote: > Tobias Scherbaum wrote: > > Luca Barbato wrote: > >> I don't see any problems with it. > > > > +1 > > > > Tobias > > +1 Since this latest version hasn't generated any noticeable disagreement, could the Council please formally vote o

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2

2008-09-14 Thread Petteri Räty
David Leverton kirjoitti: On Thursday 11 September 2008 21:06:48 Doug Goldstein wrote: Tobias Scherbaum wrote: Luca Barbato wrote: I don't see any problems with it. +1 Tobias +1 Since this latest version hasn't generated any noticeable disagreement, could the Council please formally vo

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2

2008-09-14 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 23:51:11 +0300 Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hopefully someone formats it to a real GLEP before that. git clone git://git.overlays.gentoo.org/proj/pms.git git diff origin/master..origin/eapi-2 -- Ciaran McCreesh signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2

2008-09-14 Thread Carsten Lohrke
On Sonntag, 14. September 2008, Zac Medico wrote: > Well, I'm open to alternative suggestions. Please see the previous > email in which I've attempted to explain the reasoning for the given > approach [1]. It seems to me that this approach is well suited for > solving cases in which temporary simul

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2

2008-09-14 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 21:55 Sun 14 Sep , Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 23:51:11 +0300 > Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hopefully someone formats it to a real GLEP before that. > > git clone git://git.overlays.gentoo.org/proj/pms.git > git diff origin/master..origin/eapi-2 Ciaran, cou