On 26-01-2008 17:35:37 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Related to the top level of the tree, can we get a release of repoman
> that detects if a checkout is a subset only (eg no top level), for folk
> that have subtree checkouts only? (Probably look for skel.*/profile
> items two levels up).
Is i
Hi folks,
Due to some mhonarc brokenness, all existing external links to archives
messages have become invalidated. We're looking at fixing it in such a
way that it doesn't happen again (consistent hashes instead of
sequential numbers), but it will be a day or two - restoring the old
ones is not p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008.01.27 01:08, Zac Medico wrote:
> Now that the whole tree has been converted to Manifest2 format we can
> remove the old digest files from the tree so that it is pure
> Manifest2 format [1]. Any
> users who still have a version of portage that
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 04:06:47PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> Fabian Groffen kirjoitti:
>> On 26-01-2008 17:35:37 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>>> Related to the top level of the tree, can we get a release of repoman
>>> that detects if a checkout is a subset only (eg no top level), for folk
>
Fabian Groffen kirjoitti:
On 26-01-2008 17:35:37 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Related to the top level of the tree, can we get a release of repoman
that detects if a checkout is a subset only (eg no top level), for folk
that have subtree checkouts only? (Probably look for skel.*/profile
items
Robin H. Johnson kirjoitti:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 04:06:47PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
Fabian Groffen kirjoitti:
On 26-01-2008 17:35:37 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Related to the top level of the tree, can we get a release of repoman
that detects if a checkout is a subset only (eg no to
On 10:01 Sun 27 Jan , Luca Barbato (lu_zero) wrote:
> 1.1 app-emulation/qemu-user/qemu-user-0.9.1.ebuild
>
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-emulation/qemu-user/qemu-user-0.9.1.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewc
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
> Isn't this just einstall with maybe one change?
>
Probably =)
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo Council Member
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 01:49:46AM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Due to some mhonarc brokenness, all existing external links to archives
> messages have become invalidated. We're looking at fixing it in such a
> way that it doesn't happen again (consistent hashes instead of
> sequential numbers)
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-01-27 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-util/poseidonCE 2008-01-25 10:31:24 ali_bush
www-servers/jetty 2008-01-26 18:41:31 wltjr
dev-java/jdbc2-or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Related to the top level of the tree, can we get a release of repoman
> that detects if a checkout is a subset only (eg no top level), for folk
> that have subtree checkouts only? (Probably look for skel.*/profile
> items two
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 01:49 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> sequential numbers), but it will be a day or two - restoring the old
> ones is not possible at all.
Umm... OK. What's the new format? Do we just have to go an manually
change every single link we've ever made to anything on archives?
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 06:27 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Due to how CVS hooks operate, it's not quite possible.
> You wouldn't be able to block the entire commit, only the contents of
> the files/ directory would get totally blocked.
> If you were committing an ebuild along with a patch, this w
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:08 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> If there are no objections then I don't so any reason not to go ahead and add
> the manifest1_obsolete sometime in the near future. Thoughts?
1. Add blocking of commit of files/digest-* in CVS pre-commit hook
2. Add manifest1_obsolete to tree
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 17:11 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> >> If there are no objections then I don't so any reason not to go ahead and
> >> add
> >> the manifest1_obsolete sometime in the near future. Thoughts?
> > Let's do it. I look forward to a lot less inodes on my disks.
>
> Let's schedule a da
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 05:31:36PM -0800, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 01:49 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > sequential numbers), but it will be a day or two - restoring the old
> > ones is not possible at all.
> Umm... OK. What's the new format?
For example:
http://archives.
On 1/27/08, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 01:49 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > sequential numbers), but it will be a day or two - restoring the old
> > ones is not possible at all.
>
> Umm... OK. What's the new format? Do we just have to go an manually
>
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 05:34:14PM -0800, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 06:27 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > Due to how CVS hooks operate, it's not quite possible.
> > You wouldn't be able to block the entire commit, only the contents of
> > the files/ directory would get tota
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> I do have one question, though. What does an older portage version do
> when it hits a package with a missing digest file?
>
> Let's say I've got portage prior to 2007.0's, so it doesn't support
> Manifest2 only. I want to
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 18:01 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 05:34:14PM -0800, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 06:27 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > > Due to how CVS hooks operate, it's not quite possible.
> > > You wouldn't be able to block the entire c
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 17:57 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > Do we just have to go an manually change every single link we've ever
> > made to anything on archives? How are we going to find the articles
> > if the old links don't work?
> Unfortunately the hard way, by hand.
Ouch.
> The new one
21 matches
Mail list logo
