On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 05:34:14PM -0800, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 06:27 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > Due to how CVS hooks operate, it's not quite possible. > > You wouldn't be able to block the entire commit, only the contents of > > the files/ directory would get totally blocked. > > If you were committing an ebuild along with a patch, this would be very > > bad, as the ebuild+Manifest would get committed, but the patch wouldn't. > Bleh... CVS vs. SVN. There's no "pre-commit" equivalent on CVS? There is pre-commit, but it's not recursive. It gets applied to only a single directory and in isolation from the other directories.
> Also, wouldn't the second Manifest run "fix" the missing digest commit? In what way? the problem I was concerned about was non-digest files not being committed leading to broken ebuilds. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
pgpje1bkWIIj9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
