Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for May

2007-05-03 Thread Roy Marples
On Wed, 2 May 2007 22:00:05 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What, people deliberately breaking policy that directly leads to > breaking stable and not having any working ebuilds for a package in > the tree, and then refusing to do anything about it is nothing? > > > the issue ha

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for May

2007-05-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 03 May 2007, Roy Marples wrote: > DISCLAIMER: I've not read the bug mentioned as I've lost the email > with it's number so I may just be talking out of my ass. there's nothing of value in said bug so having not read it is OK -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing retired developers from project pages

2007-05-03 Thread Xavier Neys
Jan Kundrát wrote: > Petteri Räty wrote: >> -2006-05-02 >> +$DATE: $ > > Please revert all date changes you've made for following reasons: > > a) "$DATE: $" isn't expanded by CVS > b) Even if it was expanded, I won't be expanded to the -mm-dd format > c) Even if it was in -mm-dd format, i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for May

2007-05-03 Thread José Luis Rivero (yoswink)
Roy Marples wrote: I maintain and play a game called Eternal Lands. I'm a Council member, but not part of the games team/herd. One of the problems games have with stable/unstable/testing/whatever keywords is that upstream changes things that in any other application just would not change. For e

Re: [gentoo-dev] openssh sftplogging patch

2007-05-03 Thread Rumi Szabolcs
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 03:26:23 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 14 November 2006 01:40, Rumi Szabolcs wrote: > > So here is a big PLEASE to keep/put back the sftplogging patch and > > the use flag in the openssh ebuild! > > no, get it upgraded upstream > -mike As I poin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for May

2007-05-03 Thread Roy Marples
On Thu, 03 May 2007 12:15:45 +0200 "José Luis Rivero (yoswink)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ehm, IMHO call it discriminate is a big hard. Are the gnome-2.18 or > beryl users discriminated or they should be using something different > to Gentoo? They only thing people have to do is use some ~arch

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for May

2007-05-03 Thread Matthias Langer
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 08:11 +0100, Roy Marples wrote: > On Wed, 2 May 2007 22:00:05 +0100 > Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What, people deliberately breaking policy that directly leads to > > breaking stable and not having any working ebuilds for a package in > > the tree, and then

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for May

2007-05-03 Thread José Luis Rivero (yoswink)
Roy Marples escribió: On Thu, 03 May 2007 12:15:45 +0200 "José Luis Rivero (yoswink)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ehm, IMHO call it discriminate is a big hard. Are the gnome-2.18 or beryl users discriminated or they should be using something different to Gentoo? They only thing people have to do

[gentoo-dev] KDE 4 alpha 1 packages for Gentoo?

2007-05-03 Thread Jos Poortvliet
Dear people, In a few days KDE 4 alpha 1 will be released, and we would like to give as many people as possible the opportunity to have a look at the next generation linux desktop. Thus an article is being prepared to explain to people how they can obtain KDE 4 Alpha 1 packages. A Suse-based live

Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE 4 alpha 1 packages for Gentoo?

2007-05-03 Thread Dan Meltzer
On Thursday 03 May 2007 9:12:35 am Jos Poortvliet wrote: > Dear people, > > In a few days KDE 4 alpha 1 will be released, and we would like to give as > many people as possible the opportunity to have a look at the next > generation linux desktop. Thus an article is being prepared to explain to > p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for May

2007-05-03 Thread Ferris McCormick
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 13:11 +0200, Matthias Langer wrote: > > ok, agreed, this is a valid point. so i would suggest, that maintainers > of games where this argument applies, come to special agreements with > the arch teams - or just file bugreports like this: > > " > although games-foo/lord-of-b

Re: [gentoo-dev] Looking for help with 2.6 kernel maintenance

2007-05-03 Thread Sergio D. Rodríguez Inclan
Hi, I would like to help, I'm a normal user but I think the kernel It is a very interesting way to begin to know linux more thoroughly. -- Sergio D. Rodríguez Inclan -- http://zero.arcamo.org | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux User #446728 -->

[gentoo-dev] Last rite app-misc/baobab

2007-05-03 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
+# Daniel Gryniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (3 May 2007) +# It's now part of gnome-utils; bug #176864 +app-misc/baobab Scheduled for removal June 2 2007 Daniel -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-dev] sqlite maintainership

2007-05-03 Thread Steve Dibb
Apparently, sqlite needs a maintainer (see bug 176942). If no one objects, I'll take care of it... anything I should know before hand? Thanks guys Steve -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list