Elfyn McBratney kirjoitti:
> Hullo list,
>
> Upstream for net-misc/cidr has disappeared (their homepage has been dead
> for a long long time according to archive.org), and a cursory check on
> the Internets doesn't yield a new home. Masked accordingly, pending
> removal on 2006-12-25 - 14 days ti
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:16:25 +0200
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Upstream for net-misc/cidr has disappeared (their homepage has been dead
> > for a long long time according to archive.org), and a cursory check on
> > the Internets doesn't yield a new home. Masked accordingly, pendin
Mike Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:56:58 -0500:
> Marijn Schouten wrote:
>> 3) security. When installing a package, it only has write access to its
>> own directory. I'm guessing they do this with ACLs.
>>
>> So we have this cool packa
Hi all,
net-misc/ltsp will be removed on 15 Jan 2007, it has been hard masked
today. There is no maintainer, we have an open security issue [1], so it
will be punted. If someone steps to take it over, you know what to do.
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142661
V-Li
--
Fingerpr
Tach Lance, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Lance Albertson schrieb:
> Thanks guys for taking care of this so quickly! Sorry I couldn't help
> much as I'm a bit busy traveling for the next few days.
The Gentoo flag waves in then winter windthanks.
V-Li
--
Fingerpri
Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Could you spell out that exception clause, please?
>
> It doesn't translate well into words, but we'll go with something
> like "Unless you know exactly why the rule is there, understand
> fully the implications of breaking it, and know why it's a
>
"Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not sure if anybody here knows, but alsa-plugins is not the only set
> of plugins an user installs in its system, many others are installed
> by alsa-lib itself, they are the basic plugins like dmix, dsnoop,
> iec958, plug... the ones that m
Ryan Hill kirjoitti:
>
> I don't think the average user, even the average Gentoo user, has any
> idea what any of these plug-ins do, how they work, and which ones they
> need. This is getting a bit too complicated. Is there any way to
> install everything as we've always done but still provide s
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:46:30 -0600 Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > > Could you spell out that exception clause, please?
| >
| > It doesn't translate well into words, but we'll go with something
| > like "Unless you know exactly why the rule is
On Saturday 16 December 2006 20:48, Ryan Hill wrote:
> Keeping the ALSA_PCM_PLUGINS around
> but putting it in USE_EXPAND_HIDDEN might work.
USE_EXPAND_HIDDEN is something you shouldn't really do for user-definable
behaviour.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org
Masked, as per previous announement. Nobody stepped up, so this is now on
track for removal.
George
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:46:30 -0600 Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | Can we skip the sekrit rulez crap and just spell it out? Really,
> | how does this help anyone?
>
> It's quite simple. You don't do it unless you are fully aware of the
> c
Ryan Hill wrote:
>
> I don't think the average user, even the average Gentoo user, has any
> idea what any of these plug-ins do, how they work, and which ones they
> need. This is getting a bit too complicated.
Not really I think as usual none == all ^^
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Gent
On Saturday 16 December 2006 22:18, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Not really I think as usual none == all ^^
Yes, but I also plan to make all of them in the default set.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/
Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Sound, ALSA, PAM, KDE,
"Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 16 December 2006 22:18, Luca Barbato wrote:
> > Not really I think as usual none == all ^^
> Yes, but I also plan to make all of them in the default set.
I withdraw my objection then. ;d
signature.asc
Description: PGP signatu
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:46:30 -0600 Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | > > Could you spell out that exception clause, please?
> | >
> | > It doesn't translate well into words, but we'll go with something
> | > like "Unl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:46:30 -0600 Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> | Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> | > > Could you spell out that exception clause, please?
>> | >
>> | > It d
net-fs/samba has been missing a maintainer since August, and there's
quite a lot of open bugs. Anyone interested in taking over this (at
least temporarily), please see the following list:
http://tinyurl.com/wycqt
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
h
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's quite simple. You don't do it unless you are fully aware of the
> > consequences. If you have to ask, you aren't fully aware of the
> > consequences so you mustn't do it.
>
> That's a flawed argument. Not
Jakub Moc wrote:
net-fs/samba has been missing a maintainer since August, and there's
quite a lot of open bugs. Anyone interested in taking over this (at
least temporarily), please see the following list:
http://tinyurl.com/wycqt
Thanks.
If there are any interested users, I am willing to pro
Ryan Hill wrote:
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If it's universal, then why isn't it written somewhere? After all
this, we *still* haven't gotten an answer to why some packages
outside of the system target are depending on zlib. Is this a bug? If
not, what's the reason it's there? Let's
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hrm, I thought I wrote about this a while ago but I don't see it on
> archives.g.o so lets try again.
>
> > If your package is 'not important' meaning it will never be in
> > 'system' for any profile, you should not depend on anything in
> > 'system',
Jakub Moc wrote:
> net-fs/samba has been missing a maintainer since August, and there's
> quite a lot of open bugs. Anyone interested in taking over this (at
> least temporarily), please see the following list:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/wycqt
>
> Thanks.
>
I'll give some of the issues a look over
i just closed a bunch of them and version bumped the pkg ... but dont let that
stop anyone else from having a look at still open issues :p
-mike
pgpsbLd7iZYGb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sunday 17 December 2006 10:27, Alec Warner wrote:
> If your package is 'not important' meaning it will never be in 'system' for
> any profile, you should not depend on anything in 'system', as stuff in
> system should already be installed in a given (sane) configuration.
Except if the package i
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 15:10:57 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| I've tried to be objective here so if my viewpoint isn't obvious I'll
| state it outright. I think all packages should depend on every
| package that they need to build and/or run. Whether this is done
| explicitly or with
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:21:36 -0500 Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| > It's quite simple. You don't do it unless you are fully aware of the
| > consequences. If you have to ask, you aren't fully aware of the
| > consequences so you mustn't do it.
| >
|
| Which clearly doesn't answer Rya
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:21:36 -0500 Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| > It's quite simple. You don't do it unless you are fully aware of the
| > consequences. If you have to ask, you aren't fully aware of the
| > consequences so you mustn't do it.
| >
|
| Which c
On Sunday 17 December 2006 16:04, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 15:10:57 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | I've tried to be objective here so if my viewpoint isn't obvious I'll
> | state it outright. I think all packages should depend on every
> | package that they
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 16:41:40 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| On Sunday 17 December 2006 16:04, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 15:10:57 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > wrote:
| > | I've tried to be objective here so if my viewpoint isn't obvious
| > | I'll
30 matches
Mail list logo
