On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:46:30 -0600 Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > > Could you spell out that exception clause, please? | > | > It doesn't translate well into words, but we'll go with something | > like "Unless you know exactly why the rule is there, understand | > fully the implications of breaking it, and know why it's a | > good idea in this particular case." | > | > However, if you're in a position to be invoking that clause, you | > should know about it anyway. | | Can we skip the sekrit rulez crap and just spell it out? Really, how | does this help anyone?
It's quite simple. You don't do it unless you are fully aware of the consequences. If you have to ask, you aren't fully aware of the consequences so you mustn't do it. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org Web : http://ciaranm.org/ Paludis is faster : http://ciaranm.org/show_post.pl?post_id=61
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
