Jon Portnoy wrote:
> I've been mostly inactive for a good while but hanging on mostly for
> sentimentality's sake, it's past time for that to stop.
>
>
Sad to see another one of us throwing the towel, but I guess this is
just life. People came, people go...
Thanks for all the things you have do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
As many of you probably know already, bug 46223 [1] prevents the
proper uninstallation of a package when one or more of the eclasses
that it inherits are missing from the live portage tree.
There are essentially two ways to solve this pr
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 11:33:15PM -0500, Matthew Kennedy wrote:
> If you have an interest in Scheme and the Gentoo project, I encourage
> you to go through the new developer process and start maintaining
> these Scheme ebuilds.
I am interested in Scheme and the Gentoo project, but I am not a
dev
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:56:23 -0600,
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Caleb Cushing wrote:
>
> > maybe it would be a lot of work. to even develop the tools. but it
> > would be nice if a global use flag could have a detailed option.
>
> this has been discussed a few times before. i think
Zac Medico kirjoitti:
>
> What do people think about these two approaches? Personally, I
> would prefer approach #2 for the sake of simplicity and
> maintainability. The sooner that we start storing eclasses.tbz2 for
> each installed package, the sooner that we will be able to have more
> freedo
On Saturday 04 November 2006 06:14, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Zac Medico kirjoitti:
> > What do people think about these two approaches? Personally, I
> > would prefer approach #2 for the sake of simplicity and
> > maintainability. The sooner that we start storing eclasses.tbz2 for
> > each installed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Zac Medico kirjoitti:
>> What do people think about these two approaches? Personally, I
>> would prefer approach #2 for the sake of simplicity and
>> maintainability. The sooner that we start storing eclasses.tbz2 for
>> each in
Tach j.romildo, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
> I am interested in Scheme and the Gentoo project, but I am not a
> developer. As was posted on the latest GWN, maybe it would be a good
> idea to enter the recruiting process so that I would become a developer
> and help the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Sat, 04 Nov 2006 06:47:56 -0300:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 11:33:15PM -0500, Matthew Kennedy wrote:
>
>> If you have an interest in Scheme and the Gentoo project, I encourage
>> you to go through the new developer process and start
On Sat, 2006-11-04 at 06:47 -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 11:33:15PM -0500, Matthew Kennedy wrote:
>
> > If you have an interest in Scheme and the Gentoo project, I encourage
> > you to go through the new developer process and start maintaining
> > these Scheme ebuilds.
Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Sat, 04 Nov 2006 04:08:24 -0800:
> Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Zac Medico kirjoitti:
>>> The sooner that we start storing eclasses.tbz2 for each installed
>>> package, the sooner that we will be able to have more freedom with
Zac Medico ha scritto:
> Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Zac Medico kirjoitti:
>>> What do people think about these two approaches? Personally, I
>>> would prefer approach #2 for the sake of simplicity and
>>> maintainability. The sooner that we start storing eclasses.tbz2 for
>>> each installed package,
On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 13:02:19 +
Francesco Riosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a problem however with this approach, you can't fix bug where
> the (original ebuild) exit code is "success" but the behaviour is
> "damn bugged".
You can, but perhaps not in a nice, automatic, or particularl
It's my pleasure to introduce to you Dimitry "diox" Brad. He is joining
us to translate our documentation into Dutch. Let's see if he is able to
bring us more Dutch users by improving our documentation. He is also
looking into taking the ebuild quiz later on and getting his hands dirty
on the ebuil
Its my pleasure to introduce to you Hans de Graaff (also known as
graaff), our latest addition helping with emacs/xemacs.
Hans is hailing from Delft, Netherlands (and another one joins our dutch
conspiracy), where he's currently working for a company called 'Winkwaves'
(which he partly owns),
Its my pleasure to introduce to you Naoaki Shindo (also known as shindo), our
latest addition helping with the Japanese translations.
Naoaki hails from Sapporo, Japan (that's where they eat Sushi, *yummy*), where
he lives with his wife. He's currently working for a bank, particularly the
bank'
On Sat, 2006-04-11 at 16:36 +0100, Christian Heim wrote:
> Its my pleasure to introduce to you Hans de Graaff (also known as
> graaff), our latest addition helping with emacs/xemacs.
Go Emacs! Go Emacs!
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a d
#149420 - net-mail/quotient
o Pending Removal Oct 28th 2006
o requested by Marien Zwart on behalf of python
#148530 - app-crypt/hashsum
o Pending Removal Oct 22th 2006
o requested by Hanno Boeck as primary maintainer
#114639 - net-misc/mico
o Pending Removal Oct 16th 2006
o requested by Do
#152806 - net-wireless/aircrack
o requested by Alon Lev-Bar on behalf of crypto (as primary maintainer)
o superseeded by net-wireless/aircrack-ng
o nothing depends on it
o Pending Removal Dec 04th 2006
#101536 - app-misc/largorecipes
o requested by Jakub Moc on behalf of treecleaner
o nothi
#129874 - www-client/amaya
o requested by Stefan Cornelius on behalf of security
o p.masked since 30th April 2006
--
Christian Heim
GPG key ID: 9A9F68E6
Fingerprint: AEC4 87B8 32B8 4922 B3A9 DF79 CAE3 556F 9A9F 68E6
pgp7vHHCHY8gv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
#72585 - x11-wm/qvwm
o requested by Jakub Moc on behalf of treecleaner
o nothing depends on it
o Pending Removal Dec 04th 2006
#117662 - media-libs/janus
o requested by Carsten Lohrke
o nothing depends on it
o Pending Removal Dec 04th 2006
#125491 - net-analyzer/tcpick
o requested by Dani
On 11/3/06, Jon Portnoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been mostly inactive for a good while but hanging on mostly for
sentimentality's sake, it's past time for that to stop.
It's a damn shame to see you go. I guess most of today's devs won't
know or appreciate just how much you've done for G
On Sat, 4 Nov 2006 06:46:02 -0500
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 04 November 2006 06:14, Petteri Räty wrote:
> > Zac Medico kirjoitti:
> > > What do people think about these two approaches? Personally, I
> > > would prefer approach #2 for the sake of simplicity and
> > >
On 11/3/06, Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Steve Long wrote: [Fri Nov 03 2006, 02:47:52AM CST]
> The main problem I see is USE flags (devs already
> compile with standard C-flags right?) but I was thinking about standardising
> for 2 or 3 types of network- SOHO, medium and large enterp
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 08:47:52AM +, Steve Long wrote:
> As to why I don't just do it myself, I think it's a bit silly to duplicate
> the
> compile that devs do anyway.
My compiles as a dev are of very minimal use to anybody except me.
There are too many things that are specific to my system
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Francesco Riosa wrote:
> could it be the other way around ? Use the saved and if it fail try to
> use the current?
>
> Reason for this is that otherwise you need to maintain in the tree code
> to un-merge very old packages, needlessy bloating the curr
Petteri Räty wrote:
> It's my pleasure to introduce to you Dimitry "diox" Brad. He is joining
> us to translate our documentation into Dutch. Let's see if he is able to
> bring us more Dutch users by improving our documentation. He is also
> looking into taking the ebuild quiz later on and getting
Christian Heim wrote:
> Its my pleasure to introduce to you Naoaki Shindo (also known as shindo), our
> latest addition helping with the Japanese translations.
>
> Naoaki hails from Sapporo, Japan (that's where they eat Sushi, *yummy*),
> where
> he lives with his wife. He's currently working f
c
[1]
http://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/bug_153591/data/20061104/package_names.txt.bz2
[2]
http://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/bug_153591/data/20061104/rdepend_decrease.csv.bz2
[3]
http://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/bug_153591/data/20061104/rdepend_increase.csv.bz2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 01:33:49AM -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> As many of you probably know already, bug 46223 [1] prevents the
> proper uninstallation of a package when one or more of the eclasses
> that it inherits are missing from the live portage tree.
>
> There are essentiall
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 04:56:31PM -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> Francesco Riosa wrote:
> > could it be the other way around ? Use the saved and if it fail try to
> > use the current?
> >
> > Reason for this is that otherwise you need to maintain in the tree code
> > to un-merge very old packages, ne
Howdy everyone,
On the heels of VWA getting the pounding they've needed all season comes
this request to you..
It's old and nasty and unused... Let's dump it!
Gnome 1.4!
If you have any problems please voice them here. But I'd like to see if
we've got some support for this. If the Gnome herd
upstream says it's dead and they dont want people using it ... considering the
problems we've seen that sounds just peachy
p.masked now
-mike
pgpH3TBDRNTHu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I *think* I suggested this a while back to a few developers, but, that
didn't get anywhere. I don't see any issues with removing it.
~ nick
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 02:22 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Howdy everyone,
>
> On the heels of VWA getting the pounding they've needed all season comes
> thi
On Saturday 04 November 2006 22:45, Zac Medico wrote:
> Fortunately, I don't anticipate that this change will cause significant
> disruption. My plan is to release a sys-apps/portage-2.1.1-r2 revbump
> masked by package.mask and have all of the arch teams keyword it. The
> ebuild will have an ewar
Finally, the long-needed cleanup for desktop-wm has come. The following
packages have been masked for removal on 05 Dec 2006. See bug #153388,
bugs listed in it's description, and the few-day-old thread on -dev for
more information.
x11-libs/nucleo
x11-wm/aewm++
x11-wm/aewm++-goodies
x11-wm/golem
Christian Heim wrote:
> #152806 - net-wireless/aircrack
> o requested by Alon Lev-Bar on behalf of crypto (as primary maintainer)
> o superseeded by net-wireless/aircrack-ng
Just so this doesn't end up in a GWN or something ... please spell it
"superceded."
Thanks,
Donnie
signature.asc
Descr
37 matches
Mail list logo
