Zac Medico kirjoitti: > > What do people think about these two approaches? Personally, I > would prefer approach #2 for the sake of simplicity and > maintainability. The sooner that we start storing eclasses.tbz2 for > each installed package, the sooner that we will be able to have more > freedom with the eclasses in the live portage tree.
One thing that comes to mind is that how do we handle the case where the old version of the eclass has a major bug in pkg_postrm for example. Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
