-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
--[PinePGP]--[begin]--
Ferris McCormick wrote:
You asked for patches. Both of these are incorporated in the 6.8.99
series, and have been around long enough
by depends. Be very careful with what you do
with category.use, since that can very easily break builds.
[1]
http://dev.gentoo.org/~urilith/portage-tools/bashrc-2.0.51-modular-20050612.tar.bz2
I've got some sample files in that dir for the random files the bashrc
supports.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
The following packages will be removed from Portage in 48 hours, unless
someone steps up to fix the corresponding security bugs - and takeover
upstream when it's dead :)
app-emulation/glukalka (bug 70666)
No upstream and vulnerable to multiple tempfile vulns and race
conditions, this package has b
> So to sum it up, it's not really (for me maybe) about enterprise v. hobbyist,
> it's about moving ANYONE over to Linux, period.
Actually, I rather like to think that Gentoo is one of the very few
distributions that cares more about meeting existing Linux
[power]users' needs rather than getting
Athul Acharya wrote:
>>So to sum it up, it's not really (for me maybe) about enterprise v. hobbyist,
>>it's about moving ANYONE over to Linux, period.
>
>
> Actually, I rather like to think that Gentoo is one of the very few
> distributions that cares more about meeting existing Linux
> [power]u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ferris McCormick wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>>> I'd prefer to avoid adding patches that are feature enhancements instead
>>> of small fixes, if possible. Is it a problem if we pass on those?
>>>
>
> Not really. They are not
All:
I have bumped gentoolkit to 0.2.1_pre3 and package masked it for
architecture testing and general testing of the new improved
revdep-rebuild. This version contains lots of bug fixes and I would
like give it a workout before unmasking.
There are some major changes in identifying the broken l
Hi gang,
I just (again) noticed I'm currently the only active developer of the
desktop-misc herd, which is going to change as soon as the recruitment
process is reopened again.
About 80% of all bugs assigned to desktop-misc are new ebuild
submissions for software which either falls into no other g
--- Begin Message ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Would, RESOLVED LATER, with 'need maintainer' in the status whiteboard
not be suitable? for the purpose of pulling queries, it's just as affective.
Robert
Markus Nigbur wrote:
> Hi gang,
>
> I just (again) noticed I'm currently
On Monday 13 June 2005 04:42, Robert Paskowitz wrote:
> Would, RESOLVED LATER, with 'need maintainer' in the status whiteboard
> not be suitable? for the purpose of pulling queries, it's just as
> affective.
>
> Robert
Probably, yes. It'd be just quicker/more organized way of doing it.
--
(o_
10 matches
Mail list logo
