Re: Retiring devs [was Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41]

2005-11-20 Thread Wernfried Haas
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 04:10:34PM +0100, Bryan Ãstergaard wrote: > We should be able to handle forums staff the same way I currently check > bugs activity. Only requires ro access to the database and a small > script but this would obviously have to be discussed with infra and > forum leads. As st

Re: Retiring devs [was Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41]

2005-11-20 Thread Ned Ludd
On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 16:43 +0100, Bryan Ãstergaard wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 09:34:20AM -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: > > > > I think we've fixed some of those issues with solar's script. You just > > need to look at the list and make your assumptions. The script is great > > to spitting o

Re: Retiring devs [was Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41]

2005-11-20 Thread Bryan �stergaard
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 09:34:20AM -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: > > I think we've fixed some of those issues with solar's script. You just > need to look at the list and make your assumptions. The script is great > to spitting out a list that you can look it. Its not 100%, but its good > enough t

Re: Retiring devs [was Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41]

2005-11-20 Thread Lance Albertson
Bryan Ãstergaard wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 06:26:28PM -0600, Brian Harring wrote: > >>On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 11:04:44PM +, Kurt Lieber wrote: >> The problem is in detection- an infra issue that could be solved by either allowing normal devrel people to run the detection script

Re: Retiring devs [was Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41]

2005-11-20 Thread Bryan �stergaard
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 06:26:28PM -0600, Brian Harring wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 11:04:44PM +, Kurt Lieber wrote: > > > The problem is in detection- an infra issue that could be solved by > > > either allowing normal devrel people to run the detection scripts > > > themselves (rather

Re: Retiring devs [was Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41]

2005-11-20 Thread Wernfried Haas
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 06:26:28PM -0600, Brian Harring wrote: > Forums people, any thoughts/requirements? Currently there are approximately 10 mods/admins. In general it's possible for us to keep track of who of us is active or not. Those folks also have toucan access and _should_ update their

Re: Retiring devs [was Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41]

2005-11-20 Thread Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
On Sunday 20 November 2005 01:26, Brian Harring wrote: > Would need the ability to maintain a blacklist of users to > auto-ignore (releng), and would need to pull from svn also (something > the current script doesn't handle afaik). AFAIR solar? had a small script for this. > Forums people, any t

Retiring devs [was Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41]

2005-11-19 Thread Brian Harring
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 11:04:44PM +, Kurt Lieber wrote: > > The problem is in detection- an infra issue that could be solved by > > either allowing normal devrel people to run the detection scripts > > themselves (rather then asking infra to do so) > > First I've heard of this request. Has