Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy-maintainers herd as a backup herd for all the user-maintained packages

2013-04-22 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:25:48 +0100 Markos Chandras wrote: > > > > Now, these packages have proxy-maint as co-herd, and I'd prefer > > people that are not familiar with ml (ebuilds have their set of > > specificities) not to blindly commit packages because it's > > proxy-maintained. > > I made it

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy-maintainers herd as a backup herd for all the user-maintained packages

2013-04-22 Thread Markos Chandras
On 22 April 2013 10:21, Alexis Ballier wrote: > Sorry for bringing back this thread from the dead, but... > > On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:09:47 + > Markos Chandras wrote: > >> If there is at least one Gentoo developer in metadata.xml we assume >> the package is properly maintained by him so >> we n

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy-maintainers herd as a backup herd for all the user-maintained packages

2013-04-22 Thread Alexis Ballier
Sorry for bringing back this thread from the dead, but... On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:09:47 + Markos Chandras wrote: > If there is at least one Gentoo developer in metadata.xml we assume > the package is properly maintained by him so > we never touch it. Does this include herd ? For ml stuff, I

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy-maintainers herd as a backup herd for all the user-maintained packages

2013-03-17 Thread Markos Chandras
On 17 March 2013 13:47, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 5 March 2013 15:07, Jeroen Roovers wrote: >> On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:09:47 + >> Markos Chandras wrote: >> >>> If there is at least one Gentoo developer in metadata.xml we assume >>> the package is properly maintained by him so >>> we never to

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy-maintainers herd as a backup herd for all the user-maintained packages

2013-03-17 Thread Markos Chandras
On 5 March 2013 15:07, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:09:47 + > Markos Chandras wrote: > >> If there is at least one Gentoo developer in metadata.xml we assume >> the package is properly maintained by him so >> we never touch it. > > Sounds fine. I for one am converted (and the

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy-maintainers herd as a backup herd for all the user-maintained packages

2013-03-05 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:09:47 + Markos Chandras wrote: > If there is at least one Gentoo developer in metadata.xml we assume > the package is properly maintained by him so > we never touch it. Sounds fine. I for one am converted (and the packages I maintain in that fashion). jer

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy-maintainers herd as a backup herd for all the user-maintained packages

2013-03-05 Thread Markos Chandras
On 5 March 2013 03:41, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 19:35:24 + > Markos Chandras wrote: > >> A number of packages in the tree are maintained by a Gentoo developer >> and a user. As a result of which, we are unable to monitor these >> packages in bugzilla. This is useful in case

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy-maintainers herd as a backup herd for all the user-maintained packages

2013-03-04 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 19:35:24 + Markos Chandras wrote: > A number of packages in the tree are maintained by a Gentoo developer > and a user. As a result of which, we are unable to monitor these > packages in bugzilla. This is useful in case one of the maintainers > goes MIA so we can find an a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proxy maintainers

2006-12-18 Thread Christian Heim
On Monday, 18. December. 2006 08:12, Steve Long wrote: > Yeah, I'd like to see something come of this too; I spoke to someone on IRC > (I've forgotten the login, began with `a') who was really helpful, as I was > asking about p-ming synfig packages. He (I remember it was a bloke) > mentioned I thi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proxy maintainers (was: Gentoo World Domination. a 10 step guide)

2006-10-07 Thread Andrej Kacian
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 10:06:39 +0200 Natanael Copa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Because of gentoo devs always seems to fight? Don't get confused by all the flames. It's only 10-20 devs out of ~150 who are always fighting - and that's usually only on mailinglists, they work together quite well outsi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proxy maintainers

2006-10-05 Thread Alin Nastac
Natanael Copa wrote: > Because of gentoo devs always seems to fight? > > You don't have to fight. > Its funny, I use gentoo much more that FreeBSD, I'm a freebsd port > maintainer, but nothing for Gentoo (well, im an active bugreporter...) > > When I submit a fix/version bumb (I submit as "maint

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proxy maintainers (was: Gentoo World Domination. a 10 step guide)

2006-10-05 Thread Natanael Copa
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 10:18 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > On Thursday 05 October 2006 10:06, Natanael Copa wrote: > > When I submit a fix/version bumb (I submit as "maintainer update") to > > freebsd ports, its normally committed within hours, even if its not a > > popular port. ... >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proxy maintainers (was: Gentoo World Domination. a 10 step guide)

2006-10-05 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Thursday 05 October 2006 10:06, Natanael Copa wrote: > When I submit a fix/version bumb (I submit as "maintainer update") to > freebsd ports, its normally committed within hours, even if its not a > popular port. When I submit fixes for packages in Gentoo bugzilla it get > stuck for months. They

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proxy maintainers (was: Gentoo World Domination. a 10 step guide)

2006-10-05 Thread Natanael Copa
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 09:52 +0300, Alin Nastac wrote: > Natanael Copa wrote: > > Nobody has ever showed interest and I'm not pushing my services on > > anyone. > > > Why exactly you don't want to become a Gentoo dev? Because of the byrocracy? Is it worth it to only maintain one single package?