On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:26:46 +0100
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What exactly is the difference between this valid situation and the
> previous invalid one?
It's basically down to whether pkg_setup has to be run with the same
system state as pkg_preinst / pkg_postinst. If
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:26:46PM +0100, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 22:40:08 +
> > Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Is the following set sufficient? Is the following set the least
> >> restrictive correct solution?
> >
> > ...
On Monday 12 of November 2007 13:26:46 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> What exactly is the difference between this valid situation and the
> previous invalid one?
between | | are things that can be done in parallel.
invalid:
a_pkg_setup b_pkg_setup a_build b_build | a_merge | b_merge
valid:
a_p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 22:40:08 +
> Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is the following set sufficient? Is the following set the least
>> restrictive correct solution?
>
> ... to explain the implications of these...
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 22:40:08 +
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the following set sufficient? Is the following set the least
> restrictive correct solution?
... to explain the implications of these...
Say we have packages a, b and c, and none of them have any
dependencies. One v
