-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 22:40:08 +0000 > Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Is the following set sufficient? Is the following set the least >> restrictive correct solution? > > ... to explain the implications of these... > > Say we have packages a, b and c, and none of them have any > dependencies. One valid solution to the build ordering is as follows: > > * Install a > * Install b > * Install c > > One of many solutions that is *not* valid is: > > * Start doing a, b and c in parallel. Install them as they become > ready, doing only one merge at once. > > Another that is not valid is: > > * Start doing a, b and c in parallel, but don't merge them. > * Merge a. > * Merge b. > * Merge c. > > One that is valid is: > > * Build binary packages for a, b and c in parallel. > * Merge a's binary. > * Merge b's binary. > * Merge c's binary.
What exactly is the difference between this valid situation and the previous invalid one? Marijn - -- Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML <http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHOEaGp/VmCx0OL2wRAlShAKCNohJzGNppNM7LFgHT/ID/9AyVjwCeJhlM vGHuzGLLa/+Oyj1t2T1KTP4= =TKhb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
