Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 27 Bump

2009-11-15 Thread Doug Goldstein
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 09:25:45AM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: >> Doug Goldstein wrote: >> > GLEP 27 [1] seems pretty stagnant and I'm planning on giving it a bit >> > of a refresh and actually implementing it. Now before I do this I'm >> >

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 27 Bump

2009-11-15 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 09:25:45AM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: > Doug Goldstein wrote: > > GLEP 27 [1] seems pretty stagnant and I'm planning on giving it a bit > > of a refresh and actually implementing it. Now before I do this I'm > > not in love with the format in tree but I haven't decided on a

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 27 Bump

2009-11-15 Thread Petteri Räty
Doug Goldstein wrote: > GLEP 27 [1] seems pretty stagnant and I'm planning on giving it a bit > of a refresh and actually implementing it. Now before I do this I'm > not in love with the format in tree but I haven't decided on a format > exactly in my head. So that being said, I'm sending this out