Doug Goldstein wrote: > GLEP 27 [1] seems pretty stagnant and I'm planning on giving it a bit > of a refresh and actually implementing it. Now before I do this I'm > not in love with the format in tree but I haven't decided on a format > exactly in my head. So that being said, I'm sending this out looking > for some opinions or ideas for my new GLEP. One of the obvious things > I'll cover is all the ambiguity of the GLEP with regard to the data > inside each of the files. > > [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0027.html >
One idea worth considering is making users just ebuilds with a supporting eclass. Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
