On Tuesday 22 August 2006 11:17, Duncan wrote:
> FWIW, eradicator active once again
sorry, but not really
active when it comes to something core like toolchain does not describe
eradicator's behavior
> After all, there'd have
> never been a need for eselect-compiler if gcc-config wasn't broken
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 10 August 2006 15:42, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
More generally we have varying approaches to pre-built packages;
app-office/openoffice-bin installs to /usr for example, while
mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird-bin and www-client/mozilla-firefox-bin
install to /opt.
w
On Thursday 10 August 2006 19:32, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Also, I can probably hit brad_mssw for you if you want. Since I work
> with him now.
hindsight is 20/20 eh ? no point in "blaming" people for decisions made when
at the time, said decisions were the "best"
-mike
pgp0p9SR79Nsv.pgp
Descri
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 10 August 2006 12:48, Olivier Crete wrote:
>> And I think we should continue to put the binary
>> app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-* in /emul/ and that lib32 should be
>> reserved for properly installed packages using portage whenever we
>> manage to get portage to
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 12:26 -0500, Mike Doty wrote:
> We're getting to the point where most emul stuff could be made obsolete.
> The amd64 team is having a meeting next week and I'll bring the point up.
Just don't screw over games in the process. ;]
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - St
On Thursday 10 August 2006 15:42, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:26:10 -0500
>
> Mike Doty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > Olivier Crete wrote:
> > > It makes sense that you wouldn't want these bin
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:26:10 -0500
Mike Doty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > Olivier Crete wrote:
> >> It was chosen by brad_mssw to match the way it is done on ia64.
> >> And I think we should continue to put the binary
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Olivier Crete wrote:
>> It was chosen by brad_mssw to match the way it is done on ia64. And I
>> think we should continue to put the binary
>> app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-* in /emul/ and that lib32 should be
>> reserved for p
Olivier Crete wrote:
> It was chosen by brad_mssw to match the way it is done on ia64. And I
> think we should continue to put the binary
> app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-* in /emul/ and that lib32 should be
> reserved for properly installed packages using portage whenever we
> manage to get portage
On 8/9/06, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i asked some others and they didnt get the e-mail either ... looks like our
gentoo mail server is really starting to crash here ...
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141904
-Richard
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Am Mittwoch, 9. August 2006 17:50 schrieb Mike Frysinger:
> On Wednesday 09 August 2006 10:57, Duncan wrote:
> > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> > Pure speculation here, but the idea /might/ have been to separate
> > prebuilt binary stuff into /emul, so it wouldn't conflict with
> > fut
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 10:57, Duncan wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> > looks like your mail server ate this ...
> >
> > someone remind me why our emul packages install in some obscure
> > directory tree rooted in /emul
> >
> > if we moved these things to the standard lib32
12 matches
Mail list logo
