-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Olivier Crete wrote: >> It was chosen by brad_mssw to match the way it is done on ia64. And I >> think we should continue to put the binary >> app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-* in /emul/ and that lib32 should be >> reserved for properly installed packages using portage whenever we >> manage to get portage to support it. > > It makes sense that you wouldn't want these binary packages going into > /lib32 or /usr/lib32, but /emul seems like an odd choice compared to > something like /opt/lib32. > > Thanks, > Donnie > IIRC, /emul predates FHS acceptance. also, while they are "binary" packages, they arn't in the same catagory as binary-only packages. We distribute them to assist multilib and to overcome problems that portage wasn't really designed for.
We're getting to the point where most emul stuff could be made obsolete. The amd64 team is having a meeting next week and I'll bring the point up. - -- ======================================================= Mike Doty kingtaco -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead Gentoo Developer Relations Gentoo Recruitment Lead Gentoo Infrastructure GPG: E1A5 1C9C 93FE F430 C1D6 F2AF 806B A2E4 19F4 AE05 ======================================================= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUBRNtsMIBrouQZ9K4FAQKtnAP+KmCnEVjj8yeoscAXLZybg9oInK1+0eQy VDAVU7q0gVf+WxCpiiQ8t+uhPL0tV6EGnJAkCx09dDNM6C+aOJrW8a7KEiR9S6g5 SJWN4szCtaYNiPWzpvTvGwdHQ94jPvDDPq3tX4GQN22fF1fG2Xxz56cBmvx+pXIU 40RLYip7wNs= =Xpt4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
